Pretensiones y realidad de Europa para una Mejor Gobernanza en el caso de la Regulación de las declaraciones de propiedades saludables
Resumen Analizamos los objetivos de la política de la Comisión Europea de introducir una forma más abierta, más participativa y menos jerárquica de regular la ciencia y la tecnología, en un caso particular: la Regulación Europea de las Declaraciones de Propiedades Saludables. Este marco regulatorio relativamente reciente, en principio orientado al consumidor y modificado recientemente por la nueva regulación europea de transparencia, proporciona un caso de prueba para las aspiraciones de las instituciones europeas de mejorar la gobernanza de la ciencia y la tecnología. Sin embargo, nuestro análisis muestra que estas aspiraciones no se han cumplido. La regulación europea de las declaraciones de propiedades saludables no permite ninguna participación relevante del público o de los consumidores, ni la participación de las partes interesadas en la toma de decisiones. No ofrece ningún mecanismo para facilitar el debate público o de los consumidores con respecto a los objetivos elegidos por la regulación, los estándares científicos ni los costes-beneficios involucrados, en particular las consecuencias que son el resultado de las decisiones de los reguladores. Al contrario que en las regulaciones de las declaraciones de propiedades saludables de los Estados Unidos y Japón, por ejemplo, los supuestos epistémicos y políticos subyacentes al enfoque europeo tienden a dificultar el logro de la mayoría de los objetivos participativos.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Bagchi, Debasis (2019). Nutraceutical and Functional Food Regulations in the United States and around the World (3rd Edition). New York: Academic Press.
Biesalski, Hans Konrad, et al. (2011). 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference, September 11, 2010—Scientific substantiation of health claims: Evidence-based nutrition. In Nutrition, 27(10), S1–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.04.002
Blumberg, Jeffrey, et al. (2010). Evidence-based criteria in the nutritional context. In Nutrition Reviews, 68(7) (August), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00307.x
Boer, Ali de & Bast, Aalt (2015). International legislation on nutrition and health claims. In Food Policy, 55 (August), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.06.002
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) (2015). What are “Foods with Function Claims”? (Guidance for consumers). Govern of Japan: Food Labelling Division (pubd online December 2015). https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/information/pamphlets/pdf/151224_1.pdf
Council of the European Communities (1984/2005). Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising. In Official Journal of the European Union L, 250 (September), 17–20 (Latest consolidated version: 12/06/2005)
Dehousse, Renaud (2016). Has the European Union moved towards soft governance? In Comparative European Politics, 14, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.7
Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection (2001). Discussion paper on Nutritional Claims and Functional Claims (SANCO/1341/2001). Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2016-10/labelling_nutrition-claims-claims_discussion_paper_en.pdf
Directorate-General for Health and Consumers (2011). 2nd Collective answer (to comments on EFSA”s opinions and stakeholder concerns. Brussels: European Commission (pubd online May, 2011). https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling_nutrition/claims/health_claims_en
Domínguez Díaz, Laura & Fernández-Ruiz, Virginia & Cámara, Montaña (2020). An international regulatory review of food health-related claims in functional food products labeling. In Journal of Functional Foods, 60(10), 1738-1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1592107
European Commission (EC) (2001). European governance - A white paper (COM/2001/0428 final). In Official Journal of the European Union C 287 (October 12), 1–29.
European Commission (EC) (2006). From Science and Society to Science in Society. Towards a framework for cooperative research. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4bd7721c-677f-457d-8ba3-9186f64c1823
European Commission (EC) (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5d0e77c7-2948-4ef5-aec7-bd18efe3c442
European Commission (EC) (2008). Public Engagement in Science: Report of the Science in Society Session. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2d7d42ad-d69e-46ab-94bd-035b068ae676/language-en
European Commission (2013). Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1e6ada76-a9f7-48f0-aa86-4fb9b16dd10c/language-en
European Commission (2017). Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018-2020, 16. Science with and for Society. Brussels, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-swfs_en.pdf
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2016). General guidance for stakeholders on health claim applications. In EFSA Journal, 14(1), 4367(1–38). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4367
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2017). Scientific and technical guidance for the preparation and presentation of a health claim application (Revision 2). In EFSA Journal, 15(1), 4680(1–31). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4680
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2021a). General scientific guidance for stakeholders on health claim applications (Revision 1). In EFSA Journal, 19(3), 6554. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.65543
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2021b). Scientific and technical guidance for the preparation and presentation of a health claim application (Revision 3). In EFSA Journal, 19(3), 6554. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6554
European Parliament and Council (2005). Common opinion of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on Regulation (EC) No ..../2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods (Brussels, 15 November). https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2016-10/labelling_nutrition-claims-common_position05_en.pdf
European Parliament and Council (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. In Official Journal of the European Union L 404 (December), 9–25.
European Parliament and Council (2008). Regulation (EC) No 353/2008 of 18 April 2008 establishing implementation rules for applications for authorisation of health claims as provided for in Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In Official Journal of the European Union L 109 (April), 11–16.
European Parliament and Council (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC. In Official Journal of the European Union L 231 (September), 1–28.
European Parliament, Council of the European Union, and European Commission (2016). Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In Official Journal of the European Union, L 123/1 (May 12). http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj
Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) (2003). Consumer health information for better nutrition initiative: Task Force Final Report. United States (pubd online July 2003), https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition/consumer-health-information-better-nutrition-initiative-task-force-final-report
Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) (2009/2018). Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims (FDA-2007-D-0371) (pubd online January 2009, revised 2018). https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-evidence-based-review-system-scientific-evaluation-health-claims
Greer, Scott L. & Vanhercke, Bart (2010). The hard politics of soft law: The case of health. In Elia Mossialos, Govin Permanand, Rita Baeten & Tamara Hervey (eds.), Health Systems Governance in Europe: The Role of European Union Law and Policy (Health Economics, Policy and Management). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gregori, Dario & Gafare, Claudia Elena (2012). Multifunctional food: Medical evidence and methodological notes on substantiating health claims? In International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 63(sup1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2011.653553
Guéguen, Daniel & Marissen, Vicky (2022). Science-based and evidence-based policy-making in the European Union: coexisting or conflicting concepts? In Bruges Political Research Papers, 88 (September). Department of European political and governance studies. College of Europe. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/wp88%20Marisen_Guegen.pdf
Guston, David H. (2000). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iwatani, Shun & Yamamoto, Naoyuki (2019). Functional food products in Japan: A review. In Food Science and Human Wellness, 8(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2019.03.011
Jasanoff, Sheila (1990). The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2003). Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. In Minerva, 41 (September), 223–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320
Joss, Simon & Durant, John (eds.) (1995). Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
Kamioka, Hiroharu, et al. (2019). Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review. In Nutrients, 11(7), 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071583
Khedkar, Sukhada & Bröring, Stefanie & Ciliberti, Stefano (2017). Exploring the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006: What is the impact on innovation in the EU food sector? In Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 68(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1212818
Lengwiler, Martin (2008). Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective. In Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262
Levidow, Les & Carr, Susan & Wield, David (2005). European Union regulation of agribiotechnology: precautionary links between science, expertise and policy. In Science and Public Policy, 32(4), 261–276.
López Mas, Roberto & Luján, José Luis (2022). The essentiality of nutrients: a challenge to methodological monism in the scientific substantiation of health claims. In International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 73(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2021.1948508
Rantala, Kati & Alasuutari, Noora & Kuorikoski, Jaakko (2023). The logic of regulatory impact assessment: From evidence to evidential reasoning. In Regulation & Governance (First published: 19 June 2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12542
Sanz Merino, Noemí (2020). La comunicación social de la ciencia a través del etiquetado de alimentos saludables en los EEUU y Europa. In Revista Comunicación, 1(18), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.12795/Comunicacion.2020.i18.04
Sanz Merino, Noemí (2021). Praxeologies in Regulatory Science. A case of Benefits Assessment. In A. Muñoz van den Eynde & C. Polino (Coordinators), Pocket Science: The Praxeological Dimension of Scientific Culture. Madrid: CIEMAT, 67- 81, 160–164.
Sanz Merino, Noemí (2022). Policy Styles and Epistemic Policies in the Regulation of Health Claims. A Comparison of Europe, the United States, and Japan. In Social Epistemology, 36(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.2004467
Sarvaranta, Leena et al. (2023). Futures of Science for Policy in Europe: Scenarios and Policy Implications. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Common Strategy and Foresight Service. European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/424ea70a-640c-11ee-9220-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-293925594
Schomberg, René von (2014). The quest for the ‘right’ impacts of science and technology: A framework for responsible research and innovation. In M. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B. Koops & H. Romijn (eds.), Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions 23 for Global Issues. New York: Springer, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_3
Todt, Oliver & Luján, José Luis (2017). Health Claims and Methodological Controversy in Nutrition Science. In Risk Analysis, 37(5), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12665
Todt, Oliver & Luján, José Luis (2021). Health claim regulation for public health: individual choice or libertarian paternalism? In Teorema, XL, 1, 193–213.
Valtueña, Silvia & Siani, Alfonso (2017). Health claims made on food in the EU: The edge between scientific knowledge and regulatory requirements. In Trends in Food Science & Technology, 69 (November), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.01.005
Woolley, Richard et al. (2024). Responsible Research and Innovation. In Alis Oancea, Gemma E. Derrick, Nuzha Nuseibeh & Xin Xu (eds.), Handbook of Meta-Research. Massachusetts, US: Edward Elgar, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105722.00010
Biesalski, Hans Konrad, et al. (2011). 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference, September 11, 2010—Scientific substantiation of health claims: Evidence-based nutrition. In Nutrition, 27(10), S1–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.04.002
Blumberg, Jeffrey, et al. (2010). Evidence-based criteria in the nutritional context. In Nutrition Reviews, 68(7) (August), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00307.x
Boer, Ali de & Bast, Aalt (2015). International legislation on nutrition and health claims. In Food Policy, 55 (August), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.06.002
Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) (2015). What are “Foods with Function Claims”? (Guidance for consumers). Govern of Japan: Food Labelling Division (pubd online December 2015). https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/information/pamphlets/pdf/151224_1.pdf
Council of the European Communities (1984/2005). Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising. In Official Journal of the European Union L, 250 (September), 17–20 (Latest consolidated version: 12/06/2005)
Dehousse, Renaud (2016). Has the European Union moved towards soft governance? In Comparative European Politics, 14, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.7
Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection (2001). Discussion paper on Nutritional Claims and Functional Claims (SANCO/1341/2001). Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2016-10/labelling_nutrition-claims-claims_discussion_paper_en.pdf
Directorate-General for Health and Consumers (2011). 2nd Collective answer (to comments on EFSA”s opinions and stakeholder concerns. Brussels: European Commission (pubd online May, 2011). https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling_nutrition/claims/health_claims_en
Domínguez Díaz, Laura & Fernández-Ruiz, Virginia & Cámara, Montaña (2020). An international regulatory review of food health-related claims in functional food products labeling. In Journal of Functional Foods, 60(10), 1738-1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1592107
European Commission (EC) (2001). European governance - A white paper (COM/2001/0428 final). In Official Journal of the European Union C 287 (October 12), 1–29.
European Commission (EC) (2006). From Science and Society to Science in Society. Towards a framework for cooperative research. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4bd7721c-677f-457d-8ba3-9186f64c1823
European Commission (EC) (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5d0e77c7-2948-4ef5-aec7-bd18efe3c442
European Commission (EC) (2008). Public Engagement in Science: Report of the Science in Society Session. Brussels: European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2d7d42ad-d69e-46ab-94bd-035b068ae676/language-en
European Commission (2013). Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1e6ada76-a9f7-48f0-aa86-4fb9b16dd10c/language-en
European Commission (2017). Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018-2020, 16. Science with and for Society. Brussels, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-swfs_en.pdf
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2016). General guidance for stakeholders on health claim applications. In EFSA Journal, 14(1), 4367(1–38). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4367
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2017). Scientific and technical guidance for the preparation and presentation of a health claim application (Revision 2). In EFSA Journal, 15(1), 4680(1–31). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4680
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2021a). General scientific guidance for stakeholders on health claim applications (Revision 1). In EFSA Journal, 19(3), 6554. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.65543
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2021b). Scientific and technical guidance for the preparation and presentation of a health claim application (Revision 3). In EFSA Journal, 19(3), 6554. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6554
European Parliament and Council (2005). Common opinion of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on Regulation (EC) No ..../2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods (Brussels, 15 November). https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2016-10/labelling_nutrition-claims-common_position05_en.pdf
European Parliament and Council (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. In Official Journal of the European Union L 404 (December), 9–25.
European Parliament and Council (2008). Regulation (EC) No 353/2008 of 18 April 2008 establishing implementation rules for applications for authorisation of health claims as provided for in Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In Official Journal of the European Union L 109 (April), 11–16.
European Parliament and Council (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC. In Official Journal of the European Union L 231 (September), 1–28.
European Parliament, Council of the European Union, and European Commission (2016). Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In Official Journal of the European Union, L 123/1 (May 12). http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj
Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) (2003). Consumer health information for better nutrition initiative: Task Force Final Report. United States (pubd online July 2003), https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition/consumer-health-information-better-nutrition-initiative-task-force-final-report
Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) (2009/2018). Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims (FDA-2007-D-0371) (pubd online January 2009, revised 2018). https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-evidence-based-review-system-scientific-evaluation-health-claims
Greer, Scott L. & Vanhercke, Bart (2010). The hard politics of soft law: The case of health. In Elia Mossialos, Govin Permanand, Rita Baeten & Tamara Hervey (eds.), Health Systems Governance in Europe: The Role of European Union Law and Policy (Health Economics, Policy and Management). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gregori, Dario & Gafare, Claudia Elena (2012). Multifunctional food: Medical evidence and methodological notes on substantiating health claims? In International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 63(sup1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2011.653553
Guéguen, Daniel & Marissen, Vicky (2022). Science-based and evidence-based policy-making in the European Union: coexisting or conflicting concepts? In Bruges Political Research Papers, 88 (September). Department of European political and governance studies. College of Europe. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/wp88%20Marisen_Guegen.pdf
Guston, David H. (2000). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iwatani, Shun & Yamamoto, Naoyuki (2019). Functional food products in Japan: A review. In Food Science and Human Wellness, 8(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2019.03.011
Jasanoff, Sheila (1990). The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2003). Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. In Minerva, 41 (September), 223–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320
Joss, Simon & Durant, John (eds.) (1995). Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
Kamioka, Hiroharu, et al. (2019). Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review. In Nutrients, 11(7), 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071583
Khedkar, Sukhada & Bröring, Stefanie & Ciliberti, Stefano (2017). Exploring the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006: What is the impact on innovation in the EU food sector? In Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 68(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1212818
Lengwiler, Martin (2008). Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective. In Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262
Levidow, Les & Carr, Susan & Wield, David (2005). European Union regulation of agribiotechnology: precautionary links between science, expertise and policy. In Science and Public Policy, 32(4), 261–276.
López Mas, Roberto & Luján, José Luis (2022). The essentiality of nutrients: a challenge to methodological monism in the scientific substantiation of health claims. In International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 73(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2021.1948508
Rantala, Kati & Alasuutari, Noora & Kuorikoski, Jaakko (2023). The logic of regulatory impact assessment: From evidence to evidential reasoning. In Regulation & Governance (First published: 19 June 2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12542
Sanz Merino, Noemí (2020). La comunicación social de la ciencia a través del etiquetado de alimentos saludables en los EEUU y Europa. In Revista Comunicación, 1(18), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.12795/Comunicacion.2020.i18.04
Sanz Merino, Noemí (2021). Praxeologies in Regulatory Science. A case of Benefits Assessment. In A. Muñoz van den Eynde & C. Polino (Coordinators), Pocket Science: The Praxeological Dimension of Scientific Culture. Madrid: CIEMAT, 67- 81, 160–164.
Sanz Merino, Noemí (2022). Policy Styles and Epistemic Policies in the Regulation of Health Claims. A Comparison of Europe, the United States, and Japan. In Social Epistemology, 36(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.2004467
Sarvaranta, Leena et al. (2023). Futures of Science for Policy in Europe: Scenarios and Policy Implications. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Common Strategy and Foresight Service. European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/424ea70a-640c-11ee-9220-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-293925594
Schomberg, René von (2014). The quest for the ‘right’ impacts of science and technology: A framework for responsible research and innovation. In M. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B. Koops & H. Romijn (eds.), Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions 23 for Global Issues. New York: Springer, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_3
Todt, Oliver & Luján, José Luis (2017). Health Claims and Methodological Controversy in Nutrition Science. In Risk Analysis, 37(5), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12665
Todt, Oliver & Luján, José Luis (2021). Health claim regulation for public health: individual choice or libertarian paternalism? In Teorema, XL, 1, 193–213.
Valtueña, Silvia & Siani, Alfonso (2017). Health claims made on food in the EU: The edge between scientific knowledge and regulatory requirements. In Trends in Food Science & Technology, 69 (November), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.01.005
Woolley, Richard et al. (2024). Responsible Research and Innovation. In Alis Oancea, Gemma E. Derrick, Nuzha Nuseibeh & Xin Xu (eds.), Handbook of Meta-Research. Massachusetts, US: Edward Elgar, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105722.00010
Sanz Merino, N., & Todt, O. (2025). Pretensiones y realidad de Europa para una Mejor Gobernanza en el caso de la Regulación de las declaraciones de propiedades saludables. Artefactos. Revista De Estudios Filosóficos Sobre Ciencia Y Tecnología, 14, e32954. https://doi.org/10.14201/art2025.32954
Artículos similares
- Juan Pablo Piñeiro, Melina Levy, Yanina Amarilla, Los supuestos teóricos acerca de la función de I+D en la Evaluación Institucional CONEAU. El caso de la Universidad Nacional de La Matanza , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Bárbara Burton, Agustín Barberón, Juan Martín Quiroga, Transición Energética desde la semiperiferia: desafíos de las Políticas Orientadas por Misión en la industria del litio en Argentina , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Germán Octavio Lopez Riquelme, Héctor Solís-Chagoyán, Diana Verónica Castillo Padilla, Nino Angelo Rosanía-Maza, La belleza e importancia de las revistas científicas , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Martín Parselis, Contaminaciones deseables: Arte, Diseño y los Estudios Sociales de Ciencia y Tecnología , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Oscar David Caicedo Machacon, Rene J. Campis, Eduardo Bermúdez Barrera, Mecanismos sociales, antropomorfismo y procesos cognitivos en animales no humanos. A 40 años de La política de los chimpancés , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
- Semati Palmera Rodríguez Ríos, Espacios textiles para la apropiación social de la ciencia , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 14 (2025)
- Santiago M. Kaderian, Barbara Masseilot, Mediatizaciones en ciencia y cerveza. Análisis de audiovisuales y contextos de la industria cervecera y la academia , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Antonela Isoglio, Diseño de tecnología industrial abierta a través de la modalidad de producción entre pares híbrida , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Laura Tascón González, Importancia de la divulgación científica de los riesgos naturales en los Geoparques, propuesta para el Geoparque Las Loras (Palencia, España) , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2023)
- José Luis Jaimes Sánchez, Beatriz Camarillo Cruz, Sin ciencia no hay commons marino: bases legales que impulsan la investigación científica marina en la Zona , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2023)
También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
+
−