Myth and History: The Rivalry of Two Brothers

Abstract

Western thought has been oriented towards highlighting the passion for knowledge and not by making relevant knowledge of the passions, ignoring or despising those traditional knowledges in which human beings are submerged since our birth as a genre and as individuals. As history has not only study what happened, but how he felt or thought who participated in what happened, as human beings, agents of history, act driven by passions, the myth is a product of the same. Narrative discourse of history, on the other hand, is not a neutral means to represent events and historical processes, but that is a matter of a mythical conception of reality. It is understood the attraction of the historical discourse if recognition to what extent it makes desirable is real. The word history proclaims ambiguity, combining objective and subjective aspects. Denotes the res gestae, but also the history rerum gestarum, including what happened and also the story of what has happened. The concept of history plays, therefore, the ambiguity that exists in the absence of proper distinction between the object of study, which is the human past, and the plot of the speech that on such an object is displayed. Historical representation employs the imagination and allows the potential reader to leave your imagination to help focus the past. The myth also influences social realities, exerting a legitimating role, or not, as it is the case with the political reality of a city or the prestigious noble family. Therefore, that today already not is should refer to separate clearly between myth and history, as all historical conception has mythical elements. In short, no action the mythical bordering, without some smack of the same is not history, without that it disqualifies it, but that enriches it.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Assmann, J. (2011). Historia y mito en el mundo antiguo. Madrid: Gredos.

Bietenholz, P. (1994). «Historia» and «Fabula»: Myths and Legends in Historical Thought from Antiquity to the Modern Age. Leiden: E.J. Brill, Leiden.

Burke, P. (1992). New Perspectives on Historical Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.

Cardete, M. C. (Edit.) (2010). La antigüedad y sus mitos. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Cassirer, E. (1953). Language and Myth. Nueva York: Dover Publications.

Castoriadis, C. (1983). La institución imaginaria de la sociedad. Barcelona: Tusquets.

Cruz, L. & Frijhoff, W. (2009). Myth in History, History in Myth. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Danto, A. C. (1990). Narration and Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy. Chicago, Ill: Chicago University Press.

Dumville, D. N. (1977). «Kingship, Genealogies, and Regnal List». En P. H. Sawyer, & I. N. Wood (eds.), Early Medieval Kingship (pp. 72-104). School of History: University of Leeds.

Durand, G. (1999). Ciencia del hombre y tradición. Barcelona: Paidós-Orientalia.

Feldman, B. & Richardson, R. D. (eds.) (1972). The Rise of Modern Mythology, 1680-1860. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Foucault, M. (1968). Las palabras y las cosas. México, D. F.: Siglo XXI.

Geyl, P. (1955). Use and Abuse of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.

González Ruibal, A. (2003). La experiencia del Otro. Una introducción a la etnoarqueología. Madrid: Alianza.

Gorman, J. L. (1982). The Expression of Historical Knowledge. Edinburgo: Edinburg University Press.

Gurevich, A. (1971). «Saga and History: The Historical Conception of Snorri Sturluson». Mediaeval Scandinavia, 4, 42-53.

Hill, J. D. (1988). Rethinking History and Myth: Indigenous South American Perspectives on the Past. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Holtorf, C. (2007). Archaeology is a Brand. The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Nueva York: Random House.

Jenkins, K. (1991). Re-thinking History. Londres: Routledge.

Lapouge, G. (1978). Utopies et civilization. París: Flammarion.

Lincoln, B. (1999). Theorizing Myth. Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Magasich, J. & de Beer, J-.M. (2001). América Mágica. Mitos y creencias en tiempos del descubrimiento del Nuevo Mundo. Santiago de Chile: LOM.

Mali, J. (2003). Mythistory: The Making of a Modern Historiography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Manuel, F. E. & Manuel, F. P. (1979). Utopian Thought in the Western World. Nueva York: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Marienstrass, E. (1992). Les mythes fondateurs de la nation américaine. París: Complexe.

McCullagh, B. (1984). Justifying Historical Descriptions. Nueva York: Cornell University Press.

Munslow, A. (2003). The New History. Nueva York: Longman.

Niethammer, L. (ed.) (1985). Lebenserfahrung und Kollektives Gedächtnis. Die Praxis der «Oral History». Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Ricoeur, P. (1975). La metáfora viva. Madrid: Europa.

Ricoeur, P. (1982). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Essays on language, Action and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacristán, J. D. (2006). Vivir sin dioses. Utopía, ética y progreso después del mito. Barcelona: del Serbal.

Sahlins, M. (1976). Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sauvy, A. (1965). Mythologie de notre temps. París: Payot.

Schama, S. (1992). Dead Certainties. Londres: Granta.

Schott, R. (1992). Das GeschichtsbewuBtsein schriftloser Völker. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 12, 166-205.

Schrempp, G. & Hansen, W. (2002). Myth. A New Symposium. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Shapin, S. (2000). La revolución científica. Una interpretación alternativa. Barcelona: Paidós.

Smith, A.D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Southgate, B. (1996). History. What and Why? Ancient, Modern and Postmodern Perspectives. Londres: Routledge.

Tarnas, R. (1991). The Passion of the Western Mind. Nueva York: Ballantine Books-Random House.

Taylor Stevenson, W. (1969). History as Myth. Nueva York: Seabury.

Topolski, J., (ed.) (1994). Historiography between Modernism and Postmodernism: Contributions to the Methodology of Historical Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Tulard, J. (1970). Le Mythe de Napoleon. París: A. Colin.

van Seters, J. (1989). In Search of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.

van Seters, J. (1989). «Tradition and History: History as National Tradition». Histoire et conscience historique (CCEPOA), 5, 63-74.

von Hendy, A. (2001). The Modern construction of Myth. Indianápolis: Indiana University Press.

White, H. (1978). Tropics of Discourse. Berkeley: John Hopkins University Press.

White, H. (1992). El contenido de la forma. Narrativa, discurso y representación histórica. Barcelona: Paidós.

Wolf, E. (1984). Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wunenburguer, J.-J. (2002). Une utopie de la raison. París: La Table Ronde.

Wunenburguer, J.-J. (2008). Antropología del imaginario. Buenos Aires: del Sol.

Young, R. (1990). White Mythologies: Writing History and the West. Londres: Routledge.

Yourgrau, W. & Breck, A. D. (1977). Cosmology, History, and Theology. Londres: Plenum.
López Saco, J. (2016). Myth and History: The Rivalry of Two Brothers. El Futuro Del Pasado, 7, 259–278. https://doi.org/10.14516/fdp.2016.007.001.009

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
+