De la telaraña a la web: Artefactos cognitivos en animales no-humanos
Resumen
En este trabajo examínanos la noción de “artefacto cognitivo” y su posible aplicación a la técnica animal. Aunque poco se ha dicho acerca de la técnica de los animales no-humanos, los estudios de caso centrados en la capacidad de uso y fabricación de herramientas sugieren que algunos animales, además de desarrollar complejas destrezas físicas, también despliegan habilidades cognitivas. ¿Podrían las herramientas utilizadas por los animales considerarse genuinos artefactos cognitivos? En este trabajo propondremos una definición de "artefacto cognitivo" con base a la noción de "función propia", lo cual nos permitirá desarrollar una escala gradual en donde ubicaremos diversos tipos de artefactos según la preponderancia de la función cognitiva en oposición a la función práctica. Aplicando esta escala al ámbito no humano, defenderemos la idea de que existe un ámbito técnico no-humano de fenómenos de uso y fabricación de herramientas y artefactos en el cual algunos de estos artefactos poseen una incipiente función propia de naturaleza cognitiva. Para ello, ilustraremos con ejemplos de las telas de araña, nidos y panales.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Arango-Muñoz, Santiago (2011). Two Levels of Metacognition. Philosophia, 39(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9279-0
Baber, Christopher (2003). Cognition and Tool Use: Forms of Engagement in Human and Animal Use of Tools. London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420024203
Baber, Christopher (2006). Cognitive Aspects of Tool Use. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1 SPEC. ISS.), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.004
Badallo, Ana Cuevas (2016). Artefactualidad animal. Ludus Vitalis, 24 (45), 155-174.
Bird, Christopher D. and Nathan John Emery (2009). Report Rooks Use Stones to Raise the Water Level to Reach a Floating Worm. Biology, 19, 1410-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.033
Boesch, Chiristophe and Hedwige Boesch (1990). Tool Use and Tool Making in Wild Chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, 54(1-2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156428
Borgo, Stefano, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Stefano Borgo, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu, Elisabetta Visalberghi Artifact, and Artifact Catego (2013). Artifact and Artifact Categorization: Comparing Humans and Capuchin Monkeys. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 375-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0144-5
Brey, Philip (2005). The Epistemology and Ontology of Human-Computer Interaction. Minds and Machines, 15(3-4), 383-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1
Byrne, Richard W., Crickette M. Sanz, and David B. Morgan (2013). Chimpanzees Plan Their Tool Use. En: C. M. Sanz, J. Call, and C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool Use in Animals: Cognition and Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carruthers, Peter (2006). Invertebrate Minds: A Challenge for Ethical Theory. Journal of Ethics, 11(3), 275-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-007-9015-6
Carruthers, Peter (2009). How We Know Our Own Minds: The Relationship between Mindreading and Metacognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 121-138; discussion 138-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000545
Clark, Andy (2006). Material Symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080600689872
Clark, Andy and David J. Chalmers (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Clartcey, William J. (2009). Scientific Antecedents of Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayton, Nicola S. and Anthony Dickinson (1999). Scrub Jays (Aphelocoma Coerulescens) Remember the Relative Time of Caching as Well as the Location and Content of Their Caches. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(4), 403-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.403
Clayton, Nicola S., Timothy J. Bussey, and Anthony Dickinson (2003). Can Animals Recall the Past and Plan for the Future? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4(8), 685-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1180
Cummins, Robert (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(10), 741-764. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024640
Donald, Merlin (2010). The Exographic Revolution: Neuropsychological Sequaelae. In: Lambros Malafouris & Colin Renfrew (Eds.), The Cognitive Life of Things. Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind (pp. 71-79). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.
Eberhard, William G. (1982). Behavioral Characters for the Higher Classification of Orb-Weaving Spiders. Evolution, 36(5), 1067-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05475.x
Emery, N. J. and Clayton, N. S. (2001). Effects of Experience and Social Context on Prospective Caching Strategies by Scrub Jays. Nature, 414(6862), 443-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/35106560
Fasoli, Marco (2017). Substitutive, Complementary and Constitutive Cognitive Artifacts: Developing an Interaction-Centered Approach. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0363-2
Foote, Allison L. and Jonathon D. Crystal (2007). Metacognition in the Rat. Current Biology, 17(6), 551-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061
Gallistel, Randy (1998). Insect Navigation: Brains as Symbol-Processing Organs. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 4, 1-52.
Goodall, Jane (1964). Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees. Nature, 201 (4926), 1264-1266. https://doi.org/10.1038/2011264a0
Gould, J. L. (1986). The Locale Map of Honeybees: Do Insects Have Cognitive Maps? Science, 232(4752), 861-863. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.232.4752.861
Hampton, Robert (2001). Rhesus Monkeys Know When They Remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(9), 5359-62. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071600998
Hansell, Mike and Graeme D. Ruxton (2008). Setting Tool Use within the Context of Animal Construction Behaviour. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.006
Heersmink, Richard (2012). The Varieties of Situated Cognitive Systems: Embodied Agents, Cognitive Artifacts, and Scientific Practice. Tesis doctoral obtenida de: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Heersmink,+Richard+(2012).+The+Varieties+of+Situated+Cognitive+Systems:+Embodied+Agents,+Cognitive+Artifacts,+and+Scientific+Practice&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Heersmink, Richard (2013). A Taxonomy of Cognitive Artifacts: Function, Information, and Categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 465-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1
Heersmink, Richard (2015). Dimensions of Integration in Embedded and Extended Cognitive Systems. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1
Heersmink, Richard (2016). The Metaphysics of Cognitive Artifacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19, 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2014.910310
Heersmink, Richard (2018). A Virtue Epistemology of the Internet: Search Engines, Intellectual Virtues and Education. Social Epistemology, 32(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1383530
Hollan, J. D. James, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh (2000). Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-96. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
Hunt, G. R. (1996). Manufacture and Use of Hook-Tools by New Caledonian Crows. Nature, 379(6562), 249-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/379249a0
Japyassú, Hilton F. and Kevin N. Laland (2017). Extended Spider Cognition. Animal Cognition, 20(3), 375-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1069-7
Kirsh, David (1995). The Intelligent Use of Space. Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1-2), 31-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
Leakey, Richard (1994). The Origin of the Humankind. New York: Basic Books.
Lomas, Derek (2007). Cognitive Artifacts. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, 289. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1255025
Maglio, Paul and David Kirsh (1992). Some Epistemic Benefits of Action: Tetris, a Case Study. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 14, 224.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. The MIT Press.
Mulcahy, N. J. and J. Call (2006). Apes Save Tools Fur Future Use. Science, 312(2006), 1038-40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125456
Nakata, K. (2010). Attention Focusing in a Sit-and-Wait Forager: A Spider Controls Its Prey-Detection Ability in Different Web Sectors by Adjusting Thread Tension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1678), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1583
Norman, Donald A and Carroll, M. (1991). Cognitive Artifacts. Designing Interaction, Psychology at the human-computer interface, 1, 17-38.
Norman, Donald A. (1992). Design Principles for Cognitive Artifacts. Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032391
Osvath, Mathias (2009). Spontaneous Planning for Future Stone Throwing by a Male Chimpanzee. Current Biology, 19(5), 190-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.010
Osvath, Mathias and Helena Osvath (2008). Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) and Orangutan (Pongo Abelii) Forethought: Self-Control and Pre-Experience in the Face of Future Tool Use. Animal Cognition, 11(4), 661-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0157-0
Parente, Diego y Andrés Crelier (2015). La naturaleza de los artefactos: intenciones y funciones en la cultura material. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Penna-Gonçalves, V., C. R. M. Garcia, and H. F. Japyassú (2008). Homology in a Context Dependent Predatory Behavior in Spiders (Araneae). Journal of Arachnology, 36(2), 352-59. https://doi.org/10.1636/CSt07-118.1
Perdue, Bonnie M., Theodore A. Evans, Michael J. Beran (2018). Chimpanzees Show Some Evidence of Selectively Acquiring Information by Using Tools, Making Inferences, and Evaluating Possible Outcomes. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193229
Preston, Beth (1998a). Why Is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function. Journal of Philosophy, 95(5), 215-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564689
Preston, Beth (1998b). Cognition and tool use. Mind & Language, 13(4), 513-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00090
Preston, Beth (2012). A Philosophy of Material Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069844
Proust, Joëlle (2015). The Representational Structure of Feelings. Open MIND, 31, 1-26.
Robbins, P., Aydede, M. (2009). A Short Primer on Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins, and Aydede, M., The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.001
Robinson, Michael H., Robinson, Barbara (1971). The Predatory Behavior of the Ogre-Faced Spider F. Cambridge Dinopis Longipes (Araneae: Dinopidae). The American Midland Naturalist, 85(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2423914
Sanz, Crickette M., Call, Josep, Morgan, David (2009). Design Complexity in Termite-Fishing Tools of Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Biology Letters, 5(3), 293-96. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0786
Smith, J. David (2005). Studies of Uncertainty Monitoring and Meta-Cognition in Animals and Humans. In H. Terrace and J. Metcalfe (Eds), The Missing Link in Cognition: Origins of Self-Reflective Consciousness (pp. 38-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0010
Smith, J. David (2009). The Study of Animal Metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 389-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.009
Smith, J. David, Shields, W. E, Schull, a Washburn, J. D. (1997). The Uncertain Response in Humans and Animals. Cognition, 62(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00726-3
Sokol, Joshua (2017). The Thoughts of a Spiderweb. Obtenido de: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-thoughts-of-a-spiderweb-20170523/#
Sterelny, Kim (2004). Externalism, Epistemic Artefacts and The Extended Mind. In Richard Schantz (Ed.), The Externalist Challenge. New Studies on Cognition and Intentionality (pp. 239-254). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Vermaas, Pieter E., Houkes, Wybo (2006). Technical Functions: A Drawbridge between the Intentional and Structural Natures of Technical Artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.002
Wrigth, Larry (1973). Functions. The Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183766
Baber, Christopher (2003). Cognition and Tool Use: Forms of Engagement in Human and Animal Use of Tools. London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420024203
Baber, Christopher (2006). Cognitive Aspects of Tool Use. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1 SPEC. ISS.), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.004
Badallo, Ana Cuevas (2016). Artefactualidad animal. Ludus Vitalis, 24 (45), 155-174.
Bird, Christopher D. and Nathan John Emery (2009). Report Rooks Use Stones to Raise the Water Level to Reach a Floating Worm. Biology, 19, 1410-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.033
Boesch, Chiristophe and Hedwige Boesch (1990). Tool Use and Tool Making in Wild Chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, 54(1-2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156428
Borgo, Stefano, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Stefano Borgo, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu, Elisabetta Visalberghi Artifact, and Artifact Catego (2013). Artifact and Artifact Categorization: Comparing Humans and Capuchin Monkeys. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 375-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0144-5
Brey, Philip (2005). The Epistemology and Ontology of Human-Computer Interaction. Minds and Machines, 15(3-4), 383-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1
Byrne, Richard W., Crickette M. Sanz, and David B. Morgan (2013). Chimpanzees Plan Their Tool Use. En: C. M. Sanz, J. Call, and C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool Use in Animals: Cognition and Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carruthers, Peter (2006). Invertebrate Minds: A Challenge for Ethical Theory. Journal of Ethics, 11(3), 275-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-007-9015-6
Carruthers, Peter (2009). How We Know Our Own Minds: The Relationship between Mindreading and Metacognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 121-138; discussion 138-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000545
Clark, Andy (2006). Material Symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080600689872
Clark, Andy and David J. Chalmers (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Clartcey, William J. (2009). Scientific Antecedents of Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayton, Nicola S. and Anthony Dickinson (1999). Scrub Jays (Aphelocoma Coerulescens) Remember the Relative Time of Caching as Well as the Location and Content of Their Caches. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(4), 403-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.403
Clayton, Nicola S., Timothy J. Bussey, and Anthony Dickinson (2003). Can Animals Recall the Past and Plan for the Future? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4(8), 685-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1180
Cummins, Robert (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(10), 741-764. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024640
Donald, Merlin (2010). The Exographic Revolution: Neuropsychological Sequaelae. In: Lambros Malafouris & Colin Renfrew (Eds.), The Cognitive Life of Things. Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind (pp. 71-79). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.
Eberhard, William G. (1982). Behavioral Characters for the Higher Classification of Orb-Weaving Spiders. Evolution, 36(5), 1067-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05475.x
Emery, N. J. and Clayton, N. S. (2001). Effects of Experience and Social Context on Prospective Caching Strategies by Scrub Jays. Nature, 414(6862), 443-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/35106560
Fasoli, Marco (2017). Substitutive, Complementary and Constitutive Cognitive Artifacts: Developing an Interaction-Centered Approach. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0363-2
Foote, Allison L. and Jonathon D. Crystal (2007). Metacognition in the Rat. Current Biology, 17(6), 551-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061
Gallistel, Randy (1998). Insect Navigation: Brains as Symbol-Processing Organs. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 4, 1-52.
Goodall, Jane (1964). Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees. Nature, 201 (4926), 1264-1266. https://doi.org/10.1038/2011264a0
Gould, J. L. (1986). The Locale Map of Honeybees: Do Insects Have Cognitive Maps? Science, 232(4752), 861-863. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.232.4752.861
Hampton, Robert (2001). Rhesus Monkeys Know When They Remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(9), 5359-62. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071600998
Hansell, Mike and Graeme D. Ruxton (2008). Setting Tool Use within the Context of Animal Construction Behaviour. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.006
Heersmink, Richard (2012). The Varieties of Situated Cognitive Systems: Embodied Agents, Cognitive Artifacts, and Scientific Practice. Tesis doctoral obtenida de: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Heersmink,+Richard+(2012).+The+Varieties+of+Situated+Cognitive+Systems:+Embodied+Agents,+Cognitive+Artifacts,+and+Scientific+Practice&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Heersmink, Richard (2013). A Taxonomy of Cognitive Artifacts: Function, Information, and Categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 465-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1
Heersmink, Richard (2015). Dimensions of Integration in Embedded and Extended Cognitive Systems. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1
Heersmink, Richard (2016). The Metaphysics of Cognitive Artifacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19, 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2014.910310
Heersmink, Richard (2018). A Virtue Epistemology of the Internet: Search Engines, Intellectual Virtues and Education. Social Epistemology, 32(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1383530
Hollan, J. D. James, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh (2000). Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-96. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
Hunt, G. R. (1996). Manufacture and Use of Hook-Tools by New Caledonian Crows. Nature, 379(6562), 249-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/379249a0
Japyassú, Hilton F. and Kevin N. Laland (2017). Extended Spider Cognition. Animal Cognition, 20(3), 375-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1069-7
Kirsh, David (1995). The Intelligent Use of Space. Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1-2), 31-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
Leakey, Richard (1994). The Origin of the Humankind. New York: Basic Books.
Lomas, Derek (2007). Cognitive Artifacts. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, 289. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1255025
Maglio, Paul and David Kirsh (1992). Some Epistemic Benefits of Action: Tetris, a Case Study. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 14, 224.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. The MIT Press.
Mulcahy, N. J. and J. Call (2006). Apes Save Tools Fur Future Use. Science, 312(2006), 1038-40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125456
Nakata, K. (2010). Attention Focusing in a Sit-and-Wait Forager: A Spider Controls Its Prey-Detection Ability in Different Web Sectors by Adjusting Thread Tension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1678), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1583
Norman, Donald A and Carroll, M. (1991). Cognitive Artifacts. Designing Interaction, Psychology at the human-computer interface, 1, 17-38.
Norman, Donald A. (1992). Design Principles for Cognitive Artifacts. Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032391
Osvath, Mathias (2009). Spontaneous Planning for Future Stone Throwing by a Male Chimpanzee. Current Biology, 19(5), 190-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.010
Osvath, Mathias and Helena Osvath (2008). Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) and Orangutan (Pongo Abelii) Forethought: Self-Control and Pre-Experience in the Face of Future Tool Use. Animal Cognition, 11(4), 661-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0157-0
Parente, Diego y Andrés Crelier (2015). La naturaleza de los artefactos: intenciones y funciones en la cultura material. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Penna-Gonçalves, V., C. R. M. Garcia, and H. F. Japyassú (2008). Homology in a Context Dependent Predatory Behavior in Spiders (Araneae). Journal of Arachnology, 36(2), 352-59. https://doi.org/10.1636/CSt07-118.1
Perdue, Bonnie M., Theodore A. Evans, Michael J. Beran (2018). Chimpanzees Show Some Evidence of Selectively Acquiring Information by Using Tools, Making Inferences, and Evaluating Possible Outcomes. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193229
Preston, Beth (1998a). Why Is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function. Journal of Philosophy, 95(5), 215-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564689
Preston, Beth (1998b). Cognition and tool use. Mind & Language, 13(4), 513-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00090
Preston, Beth (2012). A Philosophy of Material Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069844
Proust, Joëlle (2015). The Representational Structure of Feelings. Open MIND, 31, 1-26.
Robbins, P., Aydede, M. (2009). A Short Primer on Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins, and Aydede, M., The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.001
Robinson, Michael H., Robinson, Barbara (1971). The Predatory Behavior of the Ogre-Faced Spider F. Cambridge Dinopis Longipes (Araneae: Dinopidae). The American Midland Naturalist, 85(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2423914
Sanz, Crickette M., Call, Josep, Morgan, David (2009). Design Complexity in Termite-Fishing Tools of Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Biology Letters, 5(3), 293-96. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0786
Smith, J. David (2005). Studies of Uncertainty Monitoring and Meta-Cognition in Animals and Humans. In H. Terrace and J. Metcalfe (Eds), The Missing Link in Cognition: Origins of Self-Reflective Consciousness (pp. 38-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0010
Smith, J. David (2009). The Study of Animal Metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 389-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.009
Smith, J. David, Shields, W. E, Schull, a Washburn, J. D. (1997). The Uncertain Response in Humans and Animals. Cognition, 62(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00726-3
Sokol, Joshua (2017). The Thoughts of a Spiderweb. Obtenido de: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-thoughts-of-a-spiderweb-20170523/#
Sterelny, Kim (2004). Externalism, Epistemic Artefacts and The Extended Mind. In Richard Schantz (Ed.), The Externalist Challenge. New Studies on Cognition and Intentionality (pp. 239-254). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Vermaas, Pieter E., Houkes, Wybo (2006). Technical Functions: A Drawbridge between the Intentional and Structural Natures of Technical Artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.002
Wrigth, Larry (1973). Functions. The Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183766
Mejía Rendón, J. S., & Crelier, A. (2019). De la telaraña a la web: Artefactos cognitivos en animales no-humanos. Artefactos. Revista De Estudios Filosóficos Sobre Ciencia Y Tecnología, 8(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.14201/art2019822752
Artículos similares
- Oscar David Caicedo Machacon, Rene J. Campis, Eduardo Bermúdez Barrera, Mecanismos sociales, antropomorfismo y procesos cognitivos en animales no humanos. A 40 años de La política de los chimpancés , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
- Ariel Goldraij, La naturaleza de las funciones propias en los productos de la biología sintética , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Laura Danón, ¿Normatividad primitiva en primates no humanos? , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
- Julio Torres Meléndez, Claudia Muñoz Tobar, Homología y antropomorfización crítica , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
- Santiago Cobo, Transhumanismo y modificación genética prenatal: ¿un caso de eugenesia totalitaria? , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2023)
- Frans B. M. de Waal, Normatividad natural: el “es” y el “debe” del comportamiento animal , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
- Juan Pablo Piñeiro, Melina Levy, Yanina Amarilla, Los supuestos teóricos acerca de la función de I+D en la Evaluación Institucional CONEAU. El caso de la Universidad Nacional de La Matanza , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Antonela Isoglio, Diseño de tecnología industrial abierta a través de la modalidad de producción entre pares híbrida , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2024): La interdisciplinariedad de los estudios CTS
- Mauro Zapata, Del timing a la planificación: control temporal de la conducta en animales no-humanos , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
- Frans B. M. de Waal, Invasión silenciosa: la primatología de Imanishi y el sesgo cultural en la ciencia , Artefactos. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos sobre Ciencia y Tecnología: Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Primatología filosófica: Reflexiones sobre la obra de Frans de Waal
También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
+
−