A Theory For Systemic Improvement of Education in Latin America

Abstract

The study of the improvement of educational systems has little development in the tradition of research in Latin America. The appearance of standardized assessments, which allow the comparison of student’s achievement over time, has generated biased or simplistic interpretations of the causes of learning outcomes. The proposal for a theory of systemic improvement is based on these warnings and seeks to generate a framework that escapes evaluation biases with a pragmatic attitude that can interpret and use them to consolidate a vision of the complexity of educational systems. The grounded theory that is presented is based on multiple previous research and is organized based on four combined analytical axes: 1-systemic governance, 2-the expansion of capacities of the education system actors, 3-the alignment of accountability and 4-coherence in curricular translation. These axes require entering the black box of the functioning of educational systems and noticing the multiple layers that mediate between policies and teaching practices. In order to advance in this direction, a series of methodological derivations are proposed that favor empirical testing of the theoretical proposal. Finally, the epistemological and political problem of defining the processes of "systemic improvement" and the need to use and at the same time go beyond standardized evaluations are addressed.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Andrews, M., Lant P., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press.

Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.

Barrenechea, I., Beech, J., & Rivas, A. (2022). How can education systems improve? A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09453-7

Bellei, C., Contreras, C., Vanni, X., y Valenzuela, J. (2014). Lo aprendí en la escuela: ¿Cómo se logran procesos de mejoramiento escolar? Lom Ediciones.

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield.

Bereday, G. (1964). Comparative Method in Education. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Governing Education in a Complex World. OECD Publishing.

Carnoy, M. (2007). Cuba’s Academic Advantage. Stanford University Press.

Carnoy, M., Marotta, L., Lozano, P., Khavenson, T., Recch, F., Guimarães, F., & Carnauba, F. (2017). Intranational Comparative Education: What State Differences in Student Achievement Can Teach Us about Improving Education—the Case of Brazil. Comparative Education Review, 61(4), 726-759. https://doi.org/10.1086/693981

Cerna, L. (2014). Trust: what it is and why it matters for governance and education. OECD Education Working Papers, no. 108 (November). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxswcg0t6wl-en

Coffield, F. (2012). Why the McKinsey reports will not improve school systems. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623243

Cohen, D., & Spillane, J. (1992). Chapter 1: Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education,18(1), 3-49. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X018001003

Crato, N. (2021). In Improving a Country’s Education. Springer.

Creese, B., Gonzales, A., & Isaacs, T. (2015). Aligned instructional systems: Cross-jurisdiction benchmarking report. Center for International Education Benchmarking.

Crossley, M., & Watson, K. (2003). Comparative and international research in education. Globalisation, context and difference. Routledge Falmer.

Crouch, L. (2020). Systems Implications for Core Instructional Support Lessons from Sobral (Brazil), Puebla (Mexico), and Kenya. RISE Insight Series. 2020/020. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-RI_2020/020

Cruz, L., & Loureiro, A. (2020). Alcançando um Nível de Educação de Excelência em Condições Socioeconômicas Adversas: O Caso de Sobral. World Bank Group.

Cueto, S., León, J., & Muñoz, I. G. (2016). Conductas, estrategias y rendimiento en lectura en PISA: análisis para el Perú. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 14(3), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2016.14.3.001

Dalin, P. (1994). How Schools Improve. An International Report. Cassell.

Ehren, M., & Baxter, J. (2021). Trust, Accountability and Capacity in Education System Reform. Global Perspectives in Comparative Education. Routledge.

Elmore, R. (2004). School Reform from the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance. Harvard Education Press.

Fernandez Cano, A. (2016). A Methodological Critique of the PISA Evaluations. Relieve, 22(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8806

Fleisch, B. (2016). System-wide improvement at the instructional core: Changing reading teaching in South Africa. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9282-8

Fullan, M. (2016). The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 539- 544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9289-1

Fuller, B., & y Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001119

Gale, T. (2001). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110071002

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.

Grassi, D., & Memoli, V. (2016). Political determinants of state capacity in Latin America. World Development, 88, 94-106. H

Grindle, M. (2004). Despite the Odds. The Contentious Politics of Education Reform. Princeton University Press.

Gundlach, G. T., & Cannon, J. P. (2010). ‘Trust but verify?’ The performance implications of verification strategies in trusting relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0180-y

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Professional learning communities: A strategy for school and system improvement? Wales Journal of Education, 19(1), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.16922/wje.19.1.2

Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. McGraw-Hill Education.

IIEP-UNESCO. (2012). Strengthening of Education System. IIEP-UNESCO.

Keefer, P., y Scartascini, C. (2022). La clave de la cohesión social y el crecimiento en América Latina y el Caribe. BID.

Kurtz, M. (2013). Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, S., & Lingard, B. (2015). The Multiple Effects of International Large-Scale. Assessment on Education Policy and Research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5),621–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1039765

LLECE-UNESCO. (2013). Factores asociados al aprendizaje en el SERCE: Análisis de los factores latentes y su vínculo con los resultados académicos de los niños. OREALC-UNESCO Santiago.

López Rupérez, F., Expósito-Casas, E., y García, I. (2020). Un marco analítico para la evaluación de la calidad de la gobernanza de los sistemas educativos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 83(1), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8313672

Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. Archives Europénnes de Sociologie, 25(2), 185-213. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23999270

Martínez Rizo, F. (2008), La evaluación de aprendizajes en América Latina, Cuadernos de Investigación, 32, INEE.

Masino, S., & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2016). What works to improve the quality of student learning in developing countries? International Journal of Educational Development, 48, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.11.012

McAleavy, T., & Elwick, A. (2016). School Improvement in London: A Global Perspective. Education Development Trust.

Mjøset, L. (2006). No fear of comparisons or context: on the foundations of historical sociology. Comparative Education, 42(3), 337-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060600875584

Mourshed, M., Barber, M., & Chijioke, C. (2010). How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better. McKinsey & Company.

Murillo, F. (Coord.). (2007), Investigación Iberoamericana sobre eficacia escolar. Convenio Andrés Bello.

Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1988). Characteristics of instructionally effective school districts. The Journal of educational research, 81(3), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1988.10885819

Neto, R. M., Medeiros, H. A., Mello, F. M., de Oliveira, F. M., Lira, M. H., & Paiva, F. (2017). Ensino médio na rede estadual de Pernambuco: educação integral e pacto de gestão por resultados. Cadernos Cenpec, [S.l.], 6(2), junio. http://dx.doi.org/10.18676/cadernoscenpec.v6i2.363

OECD. (2010). Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. Lessons from PISA for the United States. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2015). Governing Complex Education Systems – Framework for Case Studies. OECD Publishing.

Osmond-Johnson, P., & Campbell, C. (2018). Transforming an education system through professional learning: developing educational change at scale in Ontario. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 241-256.

Oszlak, O. (1980). Políticas públicas y regímenes políticos: reflexiones a partir de algunas experiencias latinoamericanas. Estudios CEDES, 3(2). http://repositorio.cedes.org/handle/123456789/3470

Pang, N. S., & Miao, Z. (2017). The Roles of Teacher Leadership in Shanghai Education Success. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, 15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574221

Pritchett, L. (2015). Creating education systems coherent for learning outcomes: Making the transition from schooling to learning. RISE-WP-15/005. https://riseprogramme.org/publications/creating-education-systems-coherent-learning-outcomes

Ravela, P. (2003). ¿Cómo aparecen los resultados de las evaluaciones educativas en la prensa? PREAL.

Repetto, F. (2022). Capacidad estatal: requisito para el mejoramiento de la política social en América Latina. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.

Rivas, A. (2015). América Latina después de PISA. Lecciones aprendidas de la educación en siete países (2000-2015), CIPPEC, Natura e Instituto Natura.

Rivas, A. (2021). La mejora sistémica de la educación. Estudio de casos en América Latina. Fundación Santillana.

Rivas, A. (2022). The long road to systemic improvement in education: a comparative multi-level case study in federal countries. Comparative Education, 59(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2133860

Rivas, A., y Scasso, M. (2020). Las llaves de la educación. Estudio comparado sobre la mejora de los sistemas educativos subnacionales en América Latina. Fundación Santillana.

Rivas, A., & Scasso, M. (2021). Low stakes, high risks: the problem of intertemporal validity of PISA in Latin America. Journal of Education Policy, 36(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1696987

Sabelli, N. (2006). Complexity, technology, science, and education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_3

Schleicher, A. (2018). How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.

Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., Houang, R., Wang, H., Wiley, D., Cogan, L., y Wolfe, R. (2001). Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning. Jossey-Bass.

Schmidt, W.H., & Prawat, R.S. (2006). Curriculum coherence and national control of education: Issue or non-issue? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600682804

Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for Success: Case Studies of How Urban School Systems Improve Student Achievement. Council of the Great City Schools.

Snyder, S. (2013). The Simple, the complicated, and the complex: educational reform through the lens of complexity theory. OECD Education Working Papers, no.96.

Soifer, H. (2012). Measuring state capacity in contemporary Latin America. Revista de Ciencia Política 32(3). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2012000300004

Steward, V. (2012). A World-Class Education: Learning from International Models of Excellence and Innovation. ASCD.

Tucker, M. (2011). Surpassing Shanghai. An Agenda for American Education Built on the World’s Leading Systems. Harvard Education Press.

Valverde, G. (2009). Estándares y evaluación. En S. Schwartzmann y C. Cox (Eds.), Políticas Educativas y Cohesión Social en América Latina (pp. 57-68). CIEPLAN.

Vegas, E., & Petrow, J. (2008). Raising Student Learning in Latin America. The Challenge for the 21st Century. Banco Mundial.

Verger, A, Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2018). The Growth and Spread of Large-Scale Assessments and Test-Based Accountabilities: A Political Sociology of Global Education Reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045

Vieira, S. L., Plank, D. N., y Vidal, E. M. (2019). Política Educacional no Ceará: processos estratégicos. Educação e Realidade, 44(4). https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/87353

Weaver, K., y Rockman, B. (1993). Do institutions matter?: government capabilities in the United States and abroad. Brookings Institution Press.

Westbury, I. y Hsu, C. (1996). Structures of curriculum governance and classroom mathematics. Educational Evaluation Policy Analysis, 18, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164552

Zawistowska, A. (2014). The Black Box of the Educational Reforms in Poland: What Caused the Improvement in the PISA Scores of Polish Students? Polish Sociological Review, 187(3), 333-350.
Rivas, A. (2023). A Theory For Systemic Improvement of Education in Latin America. Teoría De La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 35(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31102

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
+