Ethics of Care: A Theoretical Underpinning for Relational Inclusivity

Abstract

Inclusive education is a paramount objective of contemporary education, as an inclusive society becomes necessary to ensure democracy, justice and peace. However, current individualistic approaches often fail to address the relational nature of students and the need for adaptive and personalized learning. Relational inclusivity emerges as an innovative approach, shifting the focus from individual-centered models to a framework that emphasizes interconnectedness and supportive communities. This paradigm fosters responsive contexts that enhance academic performance, socioemotional and personal development. Relational inclusivity integrates social network analysis to evaluate social dynamics, enabling educators to take informed pedagogical decisions, after identifying key and marginalized students. Despite its wide practical application, relational inclusivity lacks a solid theoretical underpinning that highlights its educational importance and determines its pedagogical principles. The ethics of care, which reconceptualizes people as interdependent beings reliant on caring relationships, provides the necessary theoretical foundation. The objective of this study is to establish the philosophical and theoretical foundations of relational inclusivity based on the ethics of care, promoting an educational shift centered on interdependent relationships. This article employed a theory synthesis design to summarize and integrate the principles of relational inclusivity and the ethics of care into a solid framework. The educational dimension of the ethics of care complements and expands relational inclusivity by emphasizing the importance of nurturing caring relationships within educational contexts. This theoretical synthesis broadens the educational community's understanding of relational education, offering a more adaptive and interdependent approach suited to the complexities of human relationships.

  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Acedo, C. (2008). Inclusive education: pushing the boundaries. Prospects 38, 5–13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9064-z

Alqahtani, R. (2015). High school peer buddy program: Impact on social and academic achievement for students with disabilities. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v2no1a1

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Busquets, M. (2019). Discovering the importance of Ethics of Care. Folia humanística, 12. https://doi.org/10.30860/0053

Caduff, A., Lockton, M., Daly, A. J., & Rehm, M. (2023). Beyond sharing knowledge: Knowledge brokers’ strategies to build capacity in education systems. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 8(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-10-2022-0058

Camps, M. (2021). Time for care: another way of being in the world. Arpa editores.

Cann, R., Sinnema, C., Rodway, J., & Daly, A. J. (2024). What do we know about interventions to improve educator wellbeing? A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Change, 25(2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09490-w

Carmona-Gallego, D. (2023). Percepciones y prácticas de cuidado desde una dimensión ética. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 45, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2023.n45-13

Dubos, R. (2017). Social capital: Theory and research. Routledge.

Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & psychology, 20(1), 31-48.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Goodrich, A. (2018). Peer Mentoring and Peer Tutoring Among K–12 Students: A Literature Review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(2), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123317708765

Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active learning—Beyond the future, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.

Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: a design research in K‐12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12224

Lynch, K. (2007). Love Labour as a Distinct and Non-Commodifiable Form of Care Labour. The Sociological Review, 55(3), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00714.x

Mallén-Lacambra, C., Pic, M., Lavega Burgués, P., & Ben-Chaabâne, Z. (2024). Educating gender equity through non-competitive cooperative motor games: Transforming stereotypes and socio-affective dynamics. Retos, 60, 498–508. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.107364

Mamas, C., Cohen, S.R., & Holtzman, C. (2024). Relational Inclusivity in the Elementary Classroom: A Teacher’s Guide to Supporting Student Friendships and Building Nurturing Communities (1st ed.). Routledge.

Mamas, C., Daly, A. J., & Schaelli, G. H. (2019a). Socially responsive classrooms for students with special educational needs and disabilities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100334

Mamas, C., Daly, A. J., Struyve, C., Kaimi, I., & Michail, G. (2019b). Learning, friendship and social contexts: Introducing a social network analysis toolkit for socially responsive classrooms. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6), 1255-1270. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2018-0103

Mamas, C., & Unesco, J. (2024). Exploring the Social Networks of Highly Diverse Middle School Students with Disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2023.2239165

Mamas. C., & Huang, D. (2022). Social Network Analysis Software Packages. In Frey B. (editor) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (2nd edition).

Mamas, C., & Trautman, D. (2023). Leading Towards Relational Inclusivity for Students Identified as Having Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. In Daly, A. J., Liou, Y.H. (Eds.), The Relational Leader: Catalyzing Social Networks for Educational Change. Bloomsbury.

Mauleón, X. E. (2020). Dependientes, vulnerables, capaces, receptividad y vida ética. Los libros de la Catarata.

Molinier, P (2018). El cuidado puesto a prueba por el trabajo. Vulnerabilidades cruzadas y saber-hacer discretos, In Gutiérrez, D. (Eds.), El trabajo de cuidado (pp. 191-214). Fundación Mediafé.

Niemi, P. M., & Hotulainen, R. (2016). Enhancing students’ sense of belonging through school celebrations: A study in Finnish lower-secondary schools. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(2), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1197

Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.

Rabin, C., & Smith, G. (2013). Teaching care ethics: Conceptual understandings and stories for learning. Journal of Moral Education, 42(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.785942

Rabjerg, B. (2017). An analysis of human interdependent existence. Res Cogitans, 12(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.7146/rc.1296646

Ryynänen, S., & Nivala, E. (2017). Empowerment or emancipation? Interpretations from Finland and beyond. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.SE7179/PSRI_2017.30.03

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.

Shaeffer, S. (2019). Inclusive education: a prerequisite for equity and social justice. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09598-w

Skipper, Y., & Douglas, K. (2012). Is no praise good praise? Effects of positive feedback on children's and university students’ responses to subsequent failures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x

Tronto, J. C. (1998). An ethic of care. Generations-Journal of the American Society on Aging, 22(3), 15–20.

UNESCO (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Unesco; SM foundation.

Vázquez-Verdera, V. (2009). Education and the Ethics of Care in the thought of Nel Noddings. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Valencia]. RODERIC https://roderic.uv.es/items/1ba4c7c4-0a42-4df3-8a35-f911bffcc203

Vega-Solís, C. Martínez-Buján, R., & Paredes-Chauca, M. (2018). Cuidado, comunidad y común. Extracciones, apropiaciones y sostenimiento de la vida. Traficantes De Sueños Útil.

Velasquez, A., West, R., Graham, C., & Osguthorpe, R. (2013). Developing caring relationships in schools: A review of the research on caring and nurturing pedagogies. Review of Education, 1(2), 162–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3014
Mallén-Lacambra, C., & Mamas, C. (2025). Ethics of Care: A Theoretical Underpinning for Relational Inclusivity. Teoría De La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 37(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.32183

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
+ −