Legal Responsibility behind the Measles vaccination in «Law and Order Special Victims Unit» (2009)

  • Adriana Alcocer Ruelas
    Universidad Marista de Mérida
  • Andrés Canche Hoil
    Universidad Marista de Mérida
  • Omarelly King Martínez
    Universidad Marista de Mérida
  • Sara Martínez Medel
    Universidad Marista de Mérida
  • Martha Ortega Gamboa
    Universidad Marista de Mérida
  • Karla Zapata Marín
    Universidad Marista de Mérida
  • Nina Méndez Domínguez
    Universidad Marista de Mérida ninuxka[at]hotmail.com

Abstract

Immunization against diseases trough vaccination is the one of the most important prevention measures. Preventive medicine involves an assembly of actions oriented to eradicate or minimize the incidence, severity of disease and disability. Three different levels are clearly identified as prevention strategies: Primary prevention, which implies the actions intended to reduce a certain disease incidence, decreasing the risk of new cases. It is constituted by actions focused on health promotion; Secondary prevention the measures to approach certain diseases frequency by shortening duration. Tertiary prevention is the one that is focused in reducing sequelae and disease?related disability. Vaccination campaigns are important as a primary prevention method for avoiding diseases. In the present essay following we will describe the prevention levels in the case of measles infection by analyzing a case exposed on an episode of “Law and order: Special Victims Unit” (2009), in which the consequences of the lack of vaccination are unveiled.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Aguilar Cacho J, Ceballos Martínez ZI, Chávez Hernández MM, Gómez C, Jiménez Báez MV, López San Martín DR, et al. Guía de Práctica Clínica, Prevención, Diagnóstico y Tratamiento del Paciente Pediátrico con Sarampión: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; 2009.

American Academy of Pediatrics. Vacunas contra el sarampión, paperas y rubeóla. Hosp Pediatr. 2016.

Artigas-Pallares J. Autismo y vacunas: ¿punto final? Rev Neurol. 2010; 50 (Supl 3): S91-S99.

Domínguez A, Pastor V, Sanz C. Control de brotes epidémicos mediante la vacunación. Vacunas. 2014; 15(Supl 1):266-71.

Enanoria WT, Liu F, Zipprich J, Harriman K, Ackley S, Blumberg S, et al. The Effect of Contact Investigations and Public Health Interventions in the Control and Prevention of Measles Transmission: A Simulation Study. PloS one. 2016;11(12):e0167160.

Fox A, Hung TM, Wertheim H, Vincent A, Lang B, Waters P, et al. Acute measles encephalitis in partially vaccinated adults. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e71671.133

García Morales JG. Historia natural de sarampión y sus niveles de prevención. Tesis de licenciatura. Sonora (México): Universidad de Sonora: Escuela de Enfermería; 1990.

Jané M, Torner N, Vidal MJ. Plan de vigilancia de brotes epidémicos recientes de sarampión y rubeola en Cataluña. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2015;89(4):397-406.

Naim HY. Measles virus. A pathogen, vaccine, and a vector. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(1):21-6.
Alcocer Ruelas, A., Canche Hoil, A., King Martínez, O., Martínez Medel, S., Ortega Gamboa, M., Zapata Marín, K., & Méndez Domínguez, N. (2017). Legal Responsibility behind the Measles vaccination in «Law and Order Special Victims Unit» (2009). Journal of Medicine and Movies, 13(3), 127–133. Retrieved from https://revistas.usal.es/cinco/index.php/medicina_y_cine/article/view/16980

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
+