Equivalencia semántica, conceptual, experiencial e idiomática de la medida de procesamiento sensorial para preescolares
Resumen El Comité de Expertos es la etapa IV del proceso de adaptación intercultural. El rol del comité de expertos es consolidar todas las versiones del cuestionario y desarrollar lo que se consideraría la versión prefinal del cuestionario para pruebas de campo. En este artículo, el método tiene como objetivo obtener la equivalencia semántica, idiomática, experiencial y conceptual de la Medida de Procesamiento Sensorial - preescolar versión casa y versión escuela, por un comité de expertos. Un grupo de profesionales seleccionado a propósito, compuesto por cuatro terapeutas ocupacionales especializados en trastornos de procesamiento sensorial con más de diez años de experiencia en pediatría, junto con un especialista en traducción y validación de instrumentos, formaron el grupo focal. Compararon las dos versiones (casa y escuela) e hicieron cambios significativos en el instrumento en una reunión semanal durante un mes consecutivo para adaptarlo a la cultura portuguesa. El comité de expertos logró la equivalencia entre la versión de origen y la de destino en cuatro áreas: equivalencia semántica, equivalencia idiomática, equivalencia experiencial y equivalencia conceptual. Se adaptaron varios elementos y el instrumento ahora puede probarse previamente y puede comenzar a recolectar una muestra de cien niños.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Almeida, L. and Freire, T. (2003). Metodologias da investigação em psicologia e educação (3ª ed.). Braga: Psiquilíbrios.
Almeida, L. and Freire, T. (2010). Metodologia da investigação em psicologia e educação (6ª ed.). Braga: Psiquilíbrios.
Aschidamini, I. and Saupe, R. (2004). Grupo focal - Estratégia metodologica qualitativa: Um ensaio teórico. Cogitare Enfermagem, 9 (1).
Ayres, J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Ayres, J. (2005). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles, CA: WPS.
Beaton, D., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F. and Ferraz, M. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE, 25 (24), 3186-3191.
Breen, R. (2006). A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30 (3), 463-475.
Cronbach, L. (1988). Internal consistency of tests: analyses old and new. Psychometrica, 53, 63-70.
Dunn, W. (2007a). Living Sensationally: understanding your senses. London: Jessika Kingsley Publishers.
Dunn, W. (2007b). Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants and Young Children, 20 (2), 84-101.
Ecker, C. and Parham, D. (2010). Sensory processing measure-preschoolers. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. and Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10 (13), 0-10.
Glennon, T., Kuhaneck, H. and Herzberg, D. (2011). The Sensory Processing Measure-Preschool (SPM-P)-part one: description of the tool and its use in the preschool environment. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools and Early Intervention, 4 (1), 42-52.
Gomes, M., Fernandes, P., Dixe, M., Pinto, B., Sousa, M. and Batista, S. (2016). Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation to Portuguese of the Sensory Processing Measure - Preschool (SPM-P). Research and Networks in Health, 2, 1-6.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C. and Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417-1432.
Gunther, H. (1999). Como elaborar um questionário. Brasília: Laboratorio de Psicologia Ambiental.
Hambleton, K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In K. Hambleton, P. Merenda and C. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hambleton, K. and Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45 (1-3), 153-171.
Henry, D. and McClary, M. (2011). The sensory Processing Measure-Preschool (SPM-P)- part two: test-retest and collective collaborative empowerment, including a father’s perspective. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools and Early Intervention, 4 (1), 53-70.
Horwath, J. and Basarab-Horwath, J. A. (2009). The child’s world: the comprehensive guide to assessing children in need. Jessica Kingsley Pub.
Hsu, C. and Sandford, B. (2007). The Delphi Technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12 (10), 1-8.
Miller Kuhaneck, H., Henry, D. A., Glennon, T. J. and Mu, K. (2007). Development of the sensory processing measure-School: initial studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 170-175.
Miller, L., Anzalone, M., Lane, S., Cermak, S. and Osten, E. (2007). Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 135-140.
Miller, L., Schoen, A., James, K. and Schaaf, R. (2007). Lessons learned: a pilot study of occupational therapy effectiveness for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 161.
Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. and Mukherjee, N. (2017). The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 20-32.
Olson, C. H., Henry, D. A., Kliner, A., Kyllo, A., Richter, C., Charley, J., ... Walworth, J. (2016). Effectiveness and usability of the Sensory Processing Measure-Preschool Quick Tips: data-driven intervention following the use of the SPM-Preschool in an early childhood, multiple-case study. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools and Early Intervention, 9 (2), 142-162.
Parham, D., Cohn, S. and Spetzer, S. (2007). Fidelity in sensory integration intervention research. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy and Health Care, 61, 216-227.
Parham, D. and Ecker, C. (2002). Evaluation of a sensory processing. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane and E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory Integration Theory and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 194-196). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
Parham, D., Ecker, C., Miller, H., Henry, D. A. and Glennon, T. J. (2007). Manual of sensory processing measure. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Pasquali, L. (1999). Instrumentos psicológicos: manual prático de elaboração. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
Reichenheim, M. and Moraes, C. (2007). Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemological measurement instruments. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41 (4), 1-9.
Silva, I., Veloso, A. and Keating, J. (2014). Focus group: considerações teóricas e metodológicas. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 26, 175-190.
Tomchek, S. D. and Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 190-200.
Almeida, L. and Freire, T. (2010). Metodologia da investigação em psicologia e educação (6ª ed.). Braga: Psiquilíbrios.
Aschidamini, I. and Saupe, R. (2004). Grupo focal - Estratégia metodologica qualitativa: Um ensaio teórico. Cogitare Enfermagem, 9 (1).
Ayres, J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Ayres, J. (2005). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles, CA: WPS.
Beaton, D., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F. and Ferraz, M. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE, 25 (24), 3186-3191.
Breen, R. (2006). A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30 (3), 463-475.
Cronbach, L. (1988). Internal consistency of tests: analyses old and new. Psychometrica, 53, 63-70.
Dunn, W. (2007a). Living Sensationally: understanding your senses. London: Jessika Kingsley Publishers.
Dunn, W. (2007b). Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants and Young Children, 20 (2), 84-101.
Ecker, C. and Parham, D. (2010). Sensory processing measure-preschoolers. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. and Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10 (13), 0-10.
Glennon, T., Kuhaneck, H. and Herzberg, D. (2011). The Sensory Processing Measure-Preschool (SPM-P)-part one: description of the tool and its use in the preschool environment. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools and Early Intervention, 4 (1), 42-52.
Gomes, M., Fernandes, P., Dixe, M., Pinto, B., Sousa, M. and Batista, S. (2016). Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation to Portuguese of the Sensory Processing Measure - Preschool (SPM-P). Research and Networks in Health, 2, 1-6.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C. and Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417-1432.
Gunther, H. (1999). Como elaborar um questionário. Brasília: Laboratorio de Psicologia Ambiental.
Hambleton, K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In K. Hambleton, P. Merenda and C. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hambleton, K. and Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45 (1-3), 153-171.
Henry, D. and McClary, M. (2011). The sensory Processing Measure-Preschool (SPM-P)- part two: test-retest and collective collaborative empowerment, including a father’s perspective. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools and Early Intervention, 4 (1), 53-70.
Horwath, J. and Basarab-Horwath, J. A. (2009). The child’s world: the comprehensive guide to assessing children in need. Jessica Kingsley Pub.
Hsu, C. and Sandford, B. (2007). The Delphi Technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12 (10), 1-8.
Miller Kuhaneck, H., Henry, D. A., Glennon, T. J. and Mu, K. (2007). Development of the sensory processing measure-School: initial studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 170-175.
Miller, L., Anzalone, M., Lane, S., Cermak, S. and Osten, E. (2007). Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 135-140.
Miller, L., Schoen, A., James, K. and Schaaf, R. (2007). Lessons learned: a pilot study of occupational therapy effectiveness for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 161.
Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. and Mukherjee, N. (2017). The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 20-32.
Olson, C. H., Henry, D. A., Kliner, A., Kyllo, A., Richter, C., Charley, J., ... Walworth, J. (2016). Effectiveness and usability of the Sensory Processing Measure-Preschool Quick Tips: data-driven intervention following the use of the SPM-Preschool in an early childhood, multiple-case study. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools and Early Intervention, 9 (2), 142-162.
Parham, D., Cohn, S. and Spetzer, S. (2007). Fidelity in sensory integration intervention research. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy and Health Care, 61, 216-227.
Parham, D. and Ecker, C. (2002). Evaluation of a sensory processing. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane and E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory Integration Theory and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 194-196). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
Parham, D., Ecker, C., Miller, H., Henry, D. A. and Glennon, T. J. (2007). Manual of sensory processing measure. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Pasquali, L. (1999). Instrumentos psicológicos: manual prático de elaboração. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
Reichenheim, M. and Moraes, C. (2007). Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemological measurement instruments. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41 (4), 1-9.
Silva, I., Veloso, A. and Keating, J. (2014). Focus group: considerações teóricas e metodológicas. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 26, 175-190.
Tomchek, S. D. and Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 190-200.
Silva Reis, H., Gomes, M. D., & Dixe, M. dos A. (2020). Equivalencia semántica, conceptual, experiencial e idiomática de la medida de procesamiento sensorial para preescolares. Siglo Cero, 50(4), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.14201/scero20195046173
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
+
−