Thoughts on Pain. Friedrich Nietzsche and Human Suffering

Abstract

In Nietzsche the autobiographical theme of disease has at its core the philosophical problem of pain. While he reflects daily on the actual condition of the ill person, Nietzsche oscillates the man like a pendulum. He defines him as ‘the most melancholic and most happy animal who suffers so profoundly that he must invent laughter’, as ‘the ill animal’ but also ‘the most courageous and most used to pain’. Nietzsche seems to be entertained no end by playing around with these definitions, almost as if he is making fun of Aristotle.    It is in fact these two later quotations from the Genealogy that go on to construct the tracks on which his reflections on badness and suffering will move, marking out the area in which the decisive ‘match’ of the health of humanity is discussed. The first displays a Nietzsche who is always tranchant and blazing in its ability to conjure up the humanity of humans in few words. The highlight of the determinate article is original (‘the ill animal’) and shows that man is a unique animal who can define himself as being ill.  The second suggests the image of a human being who tolerates pain with courage, arriving, just thanks to this journey of pain, to embark on a voyage leading to internal transformation.    Nietzsche’s lifelong illness was what prompted him to develop the philosophical problem of pain and its relationship with thought. Taking advantage of his condition as a constant sufferer, Nietzsche strived to understand which directions human thought is able to take whenever it is ‘subjected to the pressure of evil’. The first is a hypocritical direction, represented by man’s attempts to remove pain from his life. Nietzsche denounces all justifications made for the purpose of providing at all costs a meaning for suffering, and which converge with the modern welfare society that dares to fashion mankind ‘without evil’. The other direction, however, is that of those who are not afraid to listen to suffering. Reflecting on his own personal situation, Nietzsche outlines the traits of human beings who reach out towards the mystery of existence and, shaken by the experience of pain, come to abandon their certainties and adopt a more critical view of themselves.    ‘Every man is a medical history’, recites a posthumous fragment. Certainly, Nietzsche himself is the first to notice ‘his own story is the story of an illness and also of a healing’ – and this is not only true for him but for everyone who experiences suffering up close. This experience of pain – so intimate that it seems difficult to express in words – does not cause one to be locked up inside of oneself but rather serves to introduce a discussion on one’s subjectivity and as an occasion for a moral adventure into the profundities of one’s existence.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Andreas-Salomé, L. (1894). Friedrich Nietzsche in seinen Werken, Dresden. Carl Reikner.

Aurenque, D. (2013). “Über Nietzsches medizinische Deutung der Moral. Das Leiden als Ursprung der Moralität bei Schopenhauer und Nietzsche”, in AA. VV. Moralkritik bei Schopenhauer und Nietzsche, Würzburg. Königshausen & Neumann.

Bizzotto, M. (1981). Male, sofferenza, malattia. Saggi sul dolore, Camilliani.it. Verona.

Casini, L. (1990). La riscoperta del corpo. Schopenhauer, Feuerbach, Nietzsche. Roma. Studium.

Colli, G. (1980). Scritti su Nietzsche, Milano. Adelphi.

Deleuze, G. (1992). Nietzsche e la filosofia, Milano. Feltrinelli.

Fallica, A. (2002). “La malattia di Nietzsche”, in AA. VV. Filosofare con Nietzsche. Roma. FERV.

Fazio, D. (2009). “Postfazione”, in Andreas-Salomé, L. Friedrich Nietzsche. Milano. SE.

Janz, C.P. (1994). Friedrich Nietzsche. Biographie. Frankfurt a.M. Buchengilde Gutemberg.

Jaspers, K. (1996). Nietzsche. Introduzione alla comprensione del suo filosofare. Milano. Mursia.

Losurdo, D. (2004). Nietzsche, il ribelle aristocratico. Biografia intellettuale e bilancio critico, Torino. Bollati Boringhieri.

Mann, T. (1948). Nietzsches Philosophie im Lichte unserer Erfahrung, Berlin, Suhrkamp.

Manzi, A. (2005). “Il tema della malattia in Nietzsche. Interpretazioni e valutazioni”. Rivista di Teologia dell’Evangelizzazione, 9.

Nietzsche, F. (1967). Menschliches, Allzumenschliches I, II. Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1968). Also sprach Zarathustra. Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1968). Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1968). Zur Genealogie der Moral, Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1969). Der Antichrist, Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1969). Ecce homo. Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1969). Götzen-Dämmerung, Berlin. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1970-1974). Nachgelassene Fragmente (Herbst 1885 bis Anfang Januar 1889). Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1971). Morgenröthe. Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1971). Nachgelassene Fragmente (Anfang 1880 bis Frühjahr 1881), Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1972). Die Geburt der Tragödie. Berlin - New York.

Nietzsche, F. (1973). ‘Die Philosophie im Tragischen Zeitalter der Griechen’, in Nachgelassene Schriften 1870-1873. Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1973). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1974-1977). Nachgelassene Fragmente (Juli 1882 bis Herbst 1885), Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1975). Briefwechsel, II/5. Berlin - New York. De Gruyter.

Nuccitelli, G. (1996). Il contagio filosofico. L’odissea ideativa di Nietzsche attraverso la lunga infermità. Milano. Guerini.

Schipperges, H. (1975). Am Leitfaden des Leibes. Zur Anthropologetik und Therapeutik Friedrich Nietzsches. Stuttgart. Klett.

Schipperges, H. (1985). Homo patiens. Zur Geschichte des kranken Menschen. München - Zürich. Piper.

Semerari, F. (1993). Il gioco dei limiti. L’idea di esistenza in Nietzsche. Bari. Dedalo.

Senigaglia, C. (2011). “Schmerz, Krankheit, Genesung. Nietzsches Überlegungen zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik”, in AA. VV. Nietzsche. Sein Denken und dessen Entwicklungspotentiale, Neu-Isenburg, Lenz.

Vozza, M. (2001). Esistenza e interpretazione. Nietzsche oltre Heidegger. Roma. Donzelli.

Vozza, M. (2003). “La «grande salute» e l’ottica binoculare di Nietzsche”, in AA. VV. Nietzsche. Illuminismo. Modernità. Firenze. Olschki.
Scolari, P. (2020). Thoughts on Pain. Friedrich Nietzsche and Human Suffering. Azafea: Revista De Filosofía, 22(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.14201/azafea2020226783

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Paolo Scolari

,
Prof. Dr. Paolo Scolari Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano Dipartimento di Filosofia  
+