The evidence of Epicurean πρόληψις and its Practical Scope
Abstract This paper discusses the Epicurean preconception and the issues related to its acquisition and function (both in theoretical and practical domains). The authors argue that in the Epicurean contractual model justice is regarded as a modality of the useful and that the preconception of the just is a canon that validates the laws in the political communities. They also examine the link between language and justice in Epicureanism, focusing first on the role of language in the Epicurean genealogy of justice and, second, on the connections between language learning and the prolepsis of the just in constituted political communities. In this vein, they hold that language learning is a relevant ingredient of experience for understanding the empirical genesis of the Epicurean preconception.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
AOIZ, Javier, y Marcelo D. BOERI. «Cicero and his Clamorous Silences: Was he fair enough with the Epicu-reans and their Ethical and Political Views?». Ciceroniana on line VI 1 (2022): 55-89.
AOIZ, Javier, y Marcelo D. BOERI. Theory and Practice in Epicurean Political Philosophy. Security, Justice and Tranquility. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.
ALBERTI, Antonina. «The epicurean theory of law and justice». En Justice and Generosity, eds. André Laks y Malcolm Schofield, 161-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
ARRIGHETTI, Graziano. Epicuro. Opere. Turín: Giulio Einaudi Editore, 1973.
ASMIS, Elizabeth. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Londres: Cornell University Press, 1984.
ASMIS, Elizabeth. «Basic Education in Epicureanism». En Education in Greek and Roman antiquity, ed. Yun Lee Too, 209-40. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
BESNIER, Bertrand. «Justice et utilité de la politique dans l’épicurisme. Réponse a Elizabeth Asmis». En Cicéron et Philodème, eds. Auvray-Assayas, Clara y Daniel Delattre, 129-157. París: Rue D’Ulm, 2001.
BRUNSCHWIG, Jacques. Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
CAMPOS-DAROCCA, Francisco. «Epicurus and the Epicureans on Socrates and the Socratics». En Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, ed. Moore, Christophe, 237-265. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
DENYER, Nicholas. Plato Alcibiades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
DORANDI, Tiziano. Diogenes Laertius Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
DYSON, Henry. Prolepsis and Ennoia in Early Stoa. Berlín: De Gruyter, 2009.
FINE, Gail. The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
GARCÍA, Jesús. «Filodemo y el pensamiento antropológico griego: Phld. Sto. (PHerc.155E y 339), col. XXI». Florentia Iliberritana 2 (1991): 207-13.
GOLDSCHMIDT, Victor. La Doctrine d‘Épicure et le Droit. París: Vrin, 1977.
JÜRSS, Fritz. «Epikur und das Problem des Begriffes (Prolepse)». Philologus 121(1977): 211-225.
Konstan, David. «Epicurus on the Gods». En Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds. Jeffrey Fish y Kirk Sanders, 53-71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
KONSTAN, David. «Réponse to Morel». Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23 (2007): 27-32.
KOTZIA-PANTELLI, Paraskeve. «Ennoematikos und ousiodes logos». Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Lite-ratur unnd ihre Rezeption 144 (2000): 45-61.
KRÄMER, Hans. Platonismus und hellenistiche Philosophie. Berlín: De Gruyter, 1971.
LONG, Anthony A. From Epicurus to Epictetus Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
MANUWALD, Anke. Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1972.
MERBACH, Karl. De Epicuri canonica. Weida: Thomas et Hubert, 1909.
MOREL, Pierre-Marie. «Épicure, l’histoire et le droit». Revue des Études Anciennes 102 (2000): 393-411.
MOREL, Pierre-Marie. «Method and Evidence: Epicurean prolêpsis». Proceedings of the Boston Area Co-lloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23 (2007): 25-48.
MÜLLER, Reiner. Die epikureische Gesellschaftstheorie, Berlin: Akademie, 1972.
MÜLLER, Reiner.«Zu einem Entwicklungsprinzip der epikureischen Anthropologie». Philologus 127 (1983): 187-206.
REINHARDT, Thobias. «Epicurus and Lucretius on the origins of language». Classical Quarterly 58, 1 (2008): 127-140.
ROBITZSCH, Jan. Epicurean Justice and Law (Dissertation). Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania, 2016.
SCOTT, Dominic. Recollection and Experience: Plato’s Theory of Learning and Its Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
SEDLEY, David. «Epicurus, On Nature Book XXVIII». Cronache Ercolanesi 3 (1973): 5-83.
TSOUNA, Vuola. «Epicurean Preconceptions». Phronesis 61 (2016): 160-221.
USENER, Hermann. Epicurea. Leipzig: Teubner Verlag, 1887.
VERLISNKY, Alexander. «Epicurus and his predecessors on the origin of language». En Language and Learning, eds. Dorothea Frede and Brad Inwood, 56-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
AOIZ, Javier, y Marcelo D. BOERI. Theory and Practice in Epicurean Political Philosophy. Security, Justice and Tranquility. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.
ALBERTI, Antonina. «The epicurean theory of law and justice». En Justice and Generosity, eds. André Laks y Malcolm Schofield, 161-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
ARRIGHETTI, Graziano. Epicuro. Opere. Turín: Giulio Einaudi Editore, 1973.
ASMIS, Elizabeth. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Londres: Cornell University Press, 1984.
ASMIS, Elizabeth. «Basic Education in Epicureanism». En Education in Greek and Roman antiquity, ed. Yun Lee Too, 209-40. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
BESNIER, Bertrand. «Justice et utilité de la politique dans l’épicurisme. Réponse a Elizabeth Asmis». En Cicéron et Philodème, eds. Auvray-Assayas, Clara y Daniel Delattre, 129-157. París: Rue D’Ulm, 2001.
BRUNSCHWIG, Jacques. Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
CAMPOS-DAROCCA, Francisco. «Epicurus and the Epicureans on Socrates and the Socratics». En Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, ed. Moore, Christophe, 237-265. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
DENYER, Nicholas. Plato Alcibiades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
DORANDI, Tiziano. Diogenes Laertius Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
DYSON, Henry. Prolepsis and Ennoia in Early Stoa. Berlín: De Gruyter, 2009.
FINE, Gail. The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
GARCÍA, Jesús. «Filodemo y el pensamiento antropológico griego: Phld. Sto. (PHerc.155E y 339), col. XXI». Florentia Iliberritana 2 (1991): 207-13.
GOLDSCHMIDT, Victor. La Doctrine d‘Épicure et le Droit. París: Vrin, 1977.
JÜRSS, Fritz. «Epikur und das Problem des Begriffes (Prolepse)». Philologus 121(1977): 211-225.
Konstan, David. «Epicurus on the Gods». En Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds. Jeffrey Fish y Kirk Sanders, 53-71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
KONSTAN, David. «Réponse to Morel». Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23 (2007): 27-32.
KOTZIA-PANTELLI, Paraskeve. «Ennoematikos und ousiodes logos». Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Lite-ratur unnd ihre Rezeption 144 (2000): 45-61.
KRÄMER, Hans. Platonismus und hellenistiche Philosophie. Berlín: De Gruyter, 1971.
LONG, Anthony A. From Epicurus to Epictetus Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
MANUWALD, Anke. Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1972.
MERBACH, Karl. De Epicuri canonica. Weida: Thomas et Hubert, 1909.
MOREL, Pierre-Marie. «Épicure, l’histoire et le droit». Revue des Études Anciennes 102 (2000): 393-411.
MOREL, Pierre-Marie. «Method and Evidence: Epicurean prolêpsis». Proceedings of the Boston Area Co-lloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23 (2007): 25-48.
MÜLLER, Reiner. Die epikureische Gesellschaftstheorie, Berlin: Akademie, 1972.
MÜLLER, Reiner.«Zu einem Entwicklungsprinzip der epikureischen Anthropologie». Philologus 127 (1983): 187-206.
REINHARDT, Thobias. «Epicurus and Lucretius on the origins of language». Classical Quarterly 58, 1 (2008): 127-140.
ROBITZSCH, Jan. Epicurean Justice and Law (Dissertation). Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania, 2016.
SCOTT, Dominic. Recollection and Experience: Plato’s Theory of Learning and Its Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
SEDLEY, David. «Epicurus, On Nature Book XXVIII». Cronache Ercolanesi 3 (1973): 5-83.
TSOUNA, Vuola. «Epicurean Preconceptions». Phronesis 61 (2016): 160-221.
USENER, Hermann. Epicurea. Leipzig: Teubner Verlag, 1887.
VERLISNKY, Alexander. «Epicurus and his predecessors on the origin of language». En Language and Learning, eds. Dorothea Frede and Brad Inwood, 56-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Aoiz Monreal, J., & Boeri Carranza, M. D. (2024). The evidence of Epicurean πρόληψις and its Practical Scope. Azafea: Revista De Filosofía, 26, 229–252. https://doi.org/10.14201/azafea202426229252
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
+
−