Investigating the Role of Culture in Legal Practices in Spain
Abstract
Law, as the science that organizes and regulates society, will inevitably change its method and approach with the change in social relations. Developments, especially in the field of public law, with the speed with which the laws adopted in the legislative process cannot be adapted and updated with them, have made other sources of law, such as judicial procedure, have different functions. The following article seeks to examine and analyze the question of whether culture has influenced the formation of judicial procedure in Spanish public law. And in case of a positive answer, in what form? The results of the positive response to the developments in the contemporary world and their impact on the science of law are the judicial procedure in three parts: a) creating and establishing new norms, b) supplementing the existing norms in the legal system, c) protect the rights and freedoms of individuals, which have been recognised as a consequence of the status of judicial proceedings among the sources of public law and its promotion.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Barnett, Hilaire. 2009: Understanding public law. Routledge.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif and Derby, Daniel H. 1980: «Final Report on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court for the Implementation of the Apartheid Convention and Other Relevant International Instruments». Hofstra L. Rev., 1980, 9: 523.
Bederman, David J. 2010: Customs as a Source of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bo, Marta. 2015: «Hassan and Others v. France; Ali Samatar and Others v. France». The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2015, 30(3): 551-558.
Craig, Paul. 2013: «A general law on administrative procedure, legislative competence and judicial competence». European Public Law, 2013, 19(3).
Dimitrakopoulos, Ioannis G. 2007: Individual Rights and Liberties Under the US Constitution: The Case Law of the US Supreme Court. brill.
Duxbury, Neil. 2008: The nature and authority of precedent. Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, Mark and Varuhas. Jason. 2017: Administrative law: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Favoreu, Louis. 1998: La constitutionnalisation du droit.
Evans, Alona E. 1970: «Case Concerning the Barcelonia Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Second Phase». American Journal of International Law, 1970, 64(3): 653-693.
File-Number, See Explanatory Note. Court européenne des droits de l’homme european court of human rights.
Friedman, Leah. 2005: «Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), International Court of Justice, 9 July 2004». Sydney L. Rev., 2005, 27: 715.
Gerhardt, M. 2008: The Power of Precedent. Oxford University Press.
Giorgetti, Chiara. 2012: Introductory Note to The International Court of Justice: Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic Of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of The Congo) Compensation Owed By The Democratic Republic of The Congo to The Republic of Guinea. International Legal Materials, 2012, 51(4): 737.
Grisel, Etienne. 1970: «The lateral boundaries of the continental shelf and the judgment of the International Court of Justice in the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases». American Journal of International Law, 1970, 64(3): 562-593.
Gross, Leo. 1980: «The Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran: Phase of Provisional Measures». American Journal of International Law, 1980, 74(2): 395-410.
Hamon, Francis and Wiener, Céline. 2001: La justice constitutionnelle: Présentation générale, France, Etats-Unis, Documentation française, N 1/15.
International Law Commission et al. «First Report on Jus Cogens by Dire Tladi, Special Rapporteur, UN Doc». A/CN, 2016, 4(693): 8.
Kozel, Randy J. 2012: «Settled Versus Right: Constitutional Method and the Path of Precedent». Tex. L. Rev., 2012, 91: 1843.
Leiter, Brian. «Constitutional Law, Moral Judgment, and the Supreme Court as Super-Legislature». Hastings LJ, 2014, 66: 1601.
Lévy-Bruhl, Henri. 1950: «La Science du Droit ou ‘Juristique’». Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 1950, 8: 123-133.
Pizzorusso, Alessandro; Capotorti, Francesco and Strömholm, Stig. 1988: Law in the making: a comparative survey. Springer-Verlag.
Stephens Jr, Otis H. et al. 2011: American Constitutional Law: Civil Rights and Liberties, volume II. Cengage Learning.
Summers, Robert S. and Maccormick, Neil (eds.). 1997: Interpreting precedents: a comparative study. Ashgate/Dartmouth.
Turdush, Rukiye and Fiskesjö, Magnus. 2021: «Dossier: Uyghur Women in China’s Genocide». Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 2021, 15(1): 6.
Judgment & Report
Echr, cases of Ali Samatar and Others v. France and Hassan and Others v. France, applications nos. 17110/10 and 17301/10, applications nos. 46695/10 and 54588/10, 04.12.2014.
Echr, Cases of A.A. v. France and A.F. v. France application no. 80086/13, application no. 18039/11, 15.01.2015.
Echr, Case of Dragojević v. Croatia, Application no. 68955/11, 15/1/2015.
Echr, Case of yazar and others v. turkey, applications nos .22723/93, 22724/93 and 22725/93, 9.4.2002.
ictr, trial judgment, prosecutor v. Clément kayshema and Obed Ruzindana, Case No. ictr-9S-l-T, 21 May 1999.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Majedeh Bozorgi, Women’s Rights in Transitional Justice: The Impact of Gender Policies on Procedural Law , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
- Majedeh Bozorgi, AI-Driven Healthcare Solutions for Women: Enhancing Access and Quality of Care , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025)
Similar Articles
- Lorenzo M. Bujosa Vadell, Ley Orgánica 6/2014, de 29 de octubre, complementaria de la Ley de reconocimiento mutuo de resoluciones penales en la Unión Europea, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judicial [BOE n.º 263, de 30-X-2014] y Ley 23/2014 , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015)
- Rosangelina Fontalvo Ramos, The incorporation of electronic communications in contracts of international sale of goods , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016)
- Fernando de la Vega García, Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (Sala Segunda), de 16 de febrero de 2023. Asunto C-312/21 Tráficos Manuel Ferrer, S. L. contra Daimler AG , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)
- Antonia Durán Ayago, Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Civil Pleno, 835/2013, de 6 de febrero de 2014 (ROJ: STS 247/2014): Gestación por sustitución: problemas en la determinación de la filiación en España , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014)
- Ignacio Moralejo Menéndez, The exemption from liability for individual’s remaining debts in the Spanish Law. Provisional exemption, payment plan and final exemption , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015)
- Fabio Lins de Lessa Carvalho, The Age of the Primacy of Reality in Brazilian Administrative Law: The Role of Consequentialism and Contextualism , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023)
- Leticia Fontestad Portales, Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo (Sala de lo Civil, Sección 1ª) 236/2016, de 8 de abril. Error judicial. , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016)
- María José Añón Roig, Víctor Merino-Sancho, The concept of gender violence within the spanish legal framework: critical evaluation and proposals of a holistic and comprehensive concept , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019)
- Luis Maldonado Venegas, Genesis and transcendence of Iberoamerican law: a bridge between two continents , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019)
- Marilize da Silva Bentes, Giselle Dos Santos Andrade, Renata Monteiro García, Overview of Brazilian Feminist Criminology , AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.