Contenido principal del artículo

Zuheir N. Khlaif
Faculty of Educational sciences and Teachers' Training, An Najah National University, Nablus
Palestina, Estado de
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7354-7512
Mustafa Ghanim
An Najah National University
Palestina, Estado de
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-3530
Arij Abu Obaid
Faculty of Educational sciences and Teachers' Training, An Najah National University, Nablus
Palestina, Estado de
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-2056
Soheil Salha
Faculty of Educational sciences and Teachers' Training, An Najah National University, Nablus
Palestina, Estado de
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2791-9925
Saida Affouneh
Faculty of Educational sciences and Teachers' Training, An Najah National University, Nablus
Palestina, Estado de
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1799-4649
Vol. 22 (2021), Artículos, Páginas e23904
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23904
Aceptado: ene 10, 2021
Derechos de autor Cómo citar

Resumen

Este trabajo describe la experiencia de desarrollar un MOOC en la Universidad Nacional de An Najah y cómo ha sido transferido a un SPOC desde la perspectiva del equipo de desarrolladores. Para comprender su contenido, se habían analizado las respuestas y la participación de los estudiantes. Los datos reunidos describían la motivación para desarrollar el MOOC y luego utilizarlo como un SPOC, además de presentar los desafíos que enfrenta su desarrollo e implementación. El desarrollo del MOOC “Genética y Sociedad” en la Universidad Nacional de An Najah pasó por diferentes etapas que comenzaron con la oferta del curso a los estudiantes cara a cara y luego el desarrollo del curso en línea y su preparación como un MOOC, para finalmente utilizarlo como un SPOC para la universidad de los estudiantes. Los resultados mostraron los principales motivos para desarrollar el MOOC como un medio adecuado para aumentar el contenido en línea en lengua árabe de ciencia. El principal desafío al que se enfrentaron los diseñadores del curso fue la falta de apoyo técnico. El documento recomienda desarrollar más MOOC en diferentes idiomas en el campo de la Medicina.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Detalles del artículo

Citas

Affouneh, S., Wimpenny, K., Ghodieh, A. R. F., Alsaud, L. A., & Obaid, A. A. (2018). Reflection on MOOC Design in Palestine. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3469

Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., Parada G., H. A., & Muñoz-Organero, M. (2014). Delving into participants’ profiles and use of social tools inMOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2014.2311807

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Babson College, 231 Forest Street, Babson Park, MA 02457.

Beltrán Hernández de Galindo, M. J., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2019). Innovation in the Instructional Design of Open Mass Courses (MOOCs) to Develop Entrepreneurship Competencies in Energy Sustainability. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20, 5. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2019_20_a5

Carvalho Júnior, G. L., Cebrián Robles, D. C., Cebrián de la Serna, M., & Raposo Rivas, M. (2019). Comparative Study SPOC vs. MOOC for Socio-Technical Contents from Usability and User Satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.557726

Cheng, H. (2018). The application research of SPOC mode in mobile terminal application development course teaching. In International Conference on E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (pp. 227–231). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93719-9_30

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.

Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019

Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative Pedagogy at Massive Scale: Teaching and Learning in MOOCs. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley, & P. J. Muñoz-Merino (Eds.), Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities (pp. 98–111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_8

Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. L. (2013). A methodology proposal for developing adaptive cMOOC. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’13) (pp. 553–558). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.2536621

Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: Lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (ETHE), 13, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0024-z

Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education, 125, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004

García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., & Sein-Echaluce, M. L. (2018). An adaptive hybrid MOOC model: Disrupting the MOOC concept in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.012

Gardner, J., & Brooks, C. (2018). Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28(2), 127–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-018-9203-z

Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006

Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014a). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, 138.

Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014b). Why Do Institutions Offer MOOCs?. Online Learning, 18(3), https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.464

Jansen, D., & Goes-Daniels, M. (2016). Comparing Institutional MOOC strategies. Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October–December 2015. European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (AEDTU). https://bit.ly/3jCL3EJ

Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651

Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2018). Can Learning Analytics Find Success in Didactical Measurements? Results from a MOOC Case Study. In D. Ifenthaler (Ed.) Digital Workplace Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_12

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 4th Ed. Sage publications.

Larionova, V., Brown, K., Bystrova, T., & Sinitsyn, E. (2018). Russian perspectives of online learning technologies in higher education: An empirical study of a MOOC. Research in comparative and international education, 13(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918763420

Lee, Y. (2018). Using Self-Organizing Map and Clustering to Investigate Problem-Solving Patterns in the Massive Open Online Course: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117753364

Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). MOOC Guider: An End-to-End Dialogue System for MOOC Users. In L. Hou U, & H. Xie (Eds.), Web and Big Data. APWeb-WAIM 2018 International Workshops: MWDA, BAH, KGMA, DMMOOC, DS, Macau, China, July 23–25, 2018, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01298-4_23

Liu, S., Peng, X., Cheng, H. N. H., Liu, Z., Sun, J., & Yang, C. (2019). Unfolding Sentimental and Behavioral Tendencies of Learners’ Concerned Topics from Course Reviews in a MOOC. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 670–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757181

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., & Williams, S. A. (2014). Massive open online courses on health and medicine. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(8), e191. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3439

Mahajan, R., Gupta, P., & Singh, T. (2019). Massive Open Online Courses: Concept and Implications. Indian pediatrics, 56(6), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1575-6

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Managing, analyzing, and interpreting data. Designing Qualitative Research, 5, 205–227.

McDonald, P., & Ahern, T. (2015). Exploring the Instructional Value and Worth of a MOOC. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115571927

Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Minichiello, V. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. Longman Cheshire.

Petersen, A. K., & Gundersen, P. (2019). Challenges in Designing Personalized Learning Paths in SPOCs. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.112

Pickard, L., Shah, D., & De Simone, J. J. (2018). Mapping micro credentials across MOOC platforms. In 2018 Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS) (pp. 17–21). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/lwmoocs.2018.8534617

Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (3rd Ed.). Sage.

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008), Handbook of Action Research (2nd Ed.). Sage

Sari, A., Bonk, C. J., & Zhu, M. (2020). MOOC instructor designs and challenges: what can be learned from existing MOOCs in Indonesia and Malaysia? Asia Pacific Education Review, 21, 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09618-9

Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education. Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice, 5, 5–15.

Sullivan, R., Fulcher-Rood, K., Kruger, J., Sipley, G., & van Putten, C. (2019). Emerging Technologies for Lifelong Learning and Success: A MOOC for Everyone. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(3), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518821065

Wang, X. H., Wang, J. P., Wen, F. J., Wang, J., & Tao, J. Q. (2016). Exploration and Practice of Blended Teaching Model Based Flipped Classroom and SPOC in Higher University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(10), 99–104.

Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Sari, A. (2017, October). Instructor experiences in designing and delivering interactive MOOCs in higher education. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 509–515). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).‏