Aporías de la ética evolutiva: una revisión de la ética normativa como “ilusión efectiva”
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Asch, Solomon (1956). Studies of Independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
Caponi, Gustavo (2018). ¿Qué quiere decir "naturalizar"? Ludus Vitalis, XXVI(50): 185-188.
Dennett, Daniel (2004). La evolución de la libertad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Dewey, John (1911). The influence of Darwin on Philosophy. The Philosophical Review, 20(2), 219- 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2177662
Dupré, John (2007). El legado de Darwin. Qué significa hoy la evolución. Madrid: Katz Editores. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvndv61v
Gazzaniga, Michael (1985). The social brain. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Goodall, Jane (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
Greene, Joshua (2013). Moral tribes. Nueva York: Penguin.
Haidt, Jonathan (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Kagan, Jerome (1984). The nature of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Kahneman, Daniel (2019). Pensar rápido, pensar lento. Barcelona: Debate.
Kitcher, Philip (2011). The ethical Project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674063075
Lahti, David (2003). Parting with illusions in evolutionary ethics. Biology and Philosophy, 18(5), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026356412003
Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason (2019). The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(2), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1465061
Rosenberg, Alexander (2003). Darwinism in moral philosophy and social theory. En M. Hodge y G. Raddick (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin (pp. 310-332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521771978.014
Rottschaefer, William, Martinsen, David (1990). Really taking Darwin seriously: An alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian metaethics. Biology and Philosophy, 5(2), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127485
Ruse, Michael, Wilson, Edward (1985). The evolution of morality. New Scientist, 1478, 108-128.
Ruse, Michael (1985). Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ruse, Michael (1986). Evolutionary ethics: A phoenix arisen. Zygon, 21(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1986.tb00736.x
Ruse, Michael (1990). Evolutionary ethics and the search for predecessors: Kant, Hume, and all the way back to Aristotle? Social Philosophy and Policy, 8(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003745
Ruse, Michael (1993). The new evolutionary ethics. En M. Nitecki y D. Nitecki (eds.), Evolutionary ethics (pp. 133-162). Albany, New York: Suny Press.
Ruse, Michael (1999). Evolutionary Ethics in the Twentieth Century: Julian Sorell Huxley and George Gaylord Simpson. En J. Maienschein y M. Ruse (eds.), Biology and the Foundation of Ethics (pp. 199-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruse, Michael (2002). A Darwinian Naturalist's Perspective on Altruism. En Stephen Post et al. (eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195143584.003.0015
Ruse, Michael (2009). Evolution and ethics: The sociobiological approach. Philosophy After Darwin (pp. 489-511). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ruse, Michael (2010). The biological sciences can act as a ground for ethics. En F. J. Ayala y R. Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 297-315). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314922.ch17
Russett, Cynthia (1976). Darwin in America. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Sapolsky, Robert (2017). Behave: the biology of humans at our best and worst. Nueva York: Penguin.
Sapolsky, Robert, Share, Lisa (2004). A pacific culture among wild baboons, its emergence and transmission. Public Library of Science Biology, 2, e106-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020106
Sober, Elliott (1994). From a biological point of view: Essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624940
Spencer, Herbert (1852). A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility. Westminster Review, 1, 468-501.
Stamos, David. (2015). Myth of universal human rights: Its origin, history, and explanation, along with a more humane way. Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633350
Waal, Frans de (1982). Chimpanzee politics. Nueva York: Harper and Row.
Waal, Frans de (1991). The chimpanzee's sense of social regularity and its relation to the human sense of justice. American Behavioral Scientist, 34, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764291034003005
Waal, Frans de (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Waal, Frans de, y Lanting, Frans (1997). Bonobo: The forgotten ape. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Waal, Frans de (2007). Primates y filósofos. Barcelona: Paidós.
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
Wilson, James. (1993). The moral sense. Nueva York: Free Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938952
Woolcock, Peter (1993). Ruse's Darwinian meta-ethics: A critique. Biology and Philosophy, 8(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857688