Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan E. Carlin, Leven te Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis London and New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. xxiv + 437.


  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Acemoglu, Daron, Georgy Egorov, & Konstantin Sonin (2013). “A Political Theory of Populism”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(2):771–805.

Adcock, Robert (2005). “What is a Concept?” Committee on Concepts Methods Working Paper Series. International Political Science Association.

Adcock, Robert & David Collier (2001). “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research”. American Political Science Review, 95(3): 529-546.

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (1989). “Intraconcept Similarity and Its Implications for Interconcept Similarity”. In: Stella Vosniadou & Andrew Ortony, Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 76- 121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beach, Derek & Rasmus B. Pedersen (2013). Process Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Bennett, Andrew & Jeffrey Checkel (eds.) (2015). Process Tracing. From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Collier, David, Fernando D. Hidalgo, & Andra O. Maciuceanu (2006). “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(3): 211-246.

Collier, David (2011). “Understanding Process Tracing”. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4): 823-830.

Collier, David, Jody LaPorte, & Jason Seawright (2012). “Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor”. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1): 217-232.

Elman, Colin (2005). “Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics”. International Organization, 59(2): 293-326.

Gallie, Walter B. (1956). “Art as an Essentially Contested Concept”. The Philosophical Quarterly, 6(23): 97-114.

George, Alexander & Andrew Bennet (2005). Case Study and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goertz, Gary (2008). “Concepts, Theories and Numbers: A Checklist for Constructing, Evaluating and Using Concepts or Quantitative Measures.” In: Janet Box-Steffensmeier, Henry Brady, & David Collier, The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, pp. 87-119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hawkins, Kirk A. (2009). “Is Chavez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(8): 1040–1067.

Hawkins, Kirk A. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jagers, Jan & Stefaan Walgrave (2007). “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research, 46(3): 319–345.

Møller, Jorgen & Sven E. Skaaning (2014). The Rule of Law: Definitions, Measures, Patterns and Causes. New York: Palgrave-Mac- Millan.

Mudde, Cass (2004). “The Populist Zeitgeist”. Government and Opposition 39 (4):542–563.

Mudde, Cass & Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2013). “Populism”. In: Michael Freeden & Marc Stears, The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, pp. 493-512. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Munck, Gerardo L. & Jay Verkuilen (2002). “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices”. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1): 5-34.

Pauwels, Teun (2011). “Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(1): 97–119.

Rooduijn, Matthijs & Tjitske Akkerman (2015). “Flank Attacks Populism and Left-Right Radicalism in Western Europe.” Party Politics, July, doi:10.1177/1354068815596514.

Sarsfield, Rodolfo (2003). “Sobre los confines de la política. Fundación antropológica, naturaleza de la política y teoría normativa en Hobbes y Maquiavelo”, Documento de trabajo, Serie Jóvenes Investigadores, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (Flacso)-México.

Sartori, Giovanni (1970). “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review, 64 (4):1033–1053.

Weyland, Kurt (2001). “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics, 34(1): 1–22.
Sarsfield, R. (2019). Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan E. Carlin, Leven te Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis London and New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. xxiv + 437. Revista Latinoamericana De Opinión Pública, 8(2), 253–275.


Download data is not yet available.