Cómo hacer revisiones bibliográficas tradicionales o sistemáticas utilizando bases de datos académicas

Lluis Codina

doi:10.14201/orl.22977

How to carry out traditional or systematic bibliographic reviews us-ing academic databases

Lluis Codina

Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-1631 lluis.codina[at]upf.edu

https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.22977

Download

+ −

Metrics

5361 Views

3191 Downloads

8552 Total

How to Cite

Codina, L. (2020). How to carry out traditional or systematic bibliographic reviews us-ing academic databases. Revista ORL, 11(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.22977

Download Citation

Editorial dates

Submitted:

04/27/2020

Acceptance:

04/28/2020

Published:

05/17/2020

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Review

Keywords

Documentation
bibliographic reviews
systematized reviews
labels
ticket navigation
databases

Supporting agencies

This research didn't have any funding

License

Revista ORL is a open access journal.

Authors retain copyright and yield Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca the right of publication, distribution and reproduction of the articles under license CC BY-NC-ND (License for all items: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-SinDerivar 4.0 International ).

Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca may assign rights to include its entire contents in other institutional repositories.

Authors can have a post-publication (post-print) copy for insertion into institutional repository or personal web immediately after its publication mentioning the original citation as the copyright and self-archiving policy: SHERPA / RoMEO Dulcinea

Cession of rights

It is a condition of publication that the author or authors yield (n) magazine reproduction rights. To do this, they should fill in with your details and sign a commitment to transfer rights. If requests from third parties to reproduce or translate articles or parts thereof are produced, the decision will be up to Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.

Any breach of these rules constitute grounds for rejection of the original received.