Guías y normas sobre autoría responsable en investigación biomédica
Resumen
Numerosas revisiones, directrices y estudios analíticos de alta calidad respaldan el ICMJE y el CRediT como marcos básicos para las mejores prácticas en la asignación de autoría, la declaración y los derechos dentro de la publicación biomédica, con una sólida cobertura de las taxonomías de contribución, los mecanismos de resolución de disputas y las cuestiones de derechos de autor/transferencia de derechos, todo ello basado en normas internacionales reconocidas y basadas en el consenso.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Codina L. Artículos científicos: quién puede firmarlos y en qué orden. Ética y pragmatismo de la publicación académica. Rev ORL. 2019;10(3):193–205.
Comité Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas. Recomendaciones para la realización, presentación, edición y publicación de trabajos académicos en revistas médicas. Acta Médica Colomb. 2015 Aug 29;40(2):57–76.
Michael Duncan. CRediT Contributor Register: A practical tool for tracking and recognising individual research contributions using the CRediT taxonomy. [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20933/100001406
K. Alpi, K. Akers. CRediT for authors of articles published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2021;109:362–4.
Kosycheva MA. CRediT Statement for Recognizing Author Contributions. Health Food Biotechnol [Internet]. 2023 July 6 [cited 2025 July 27];5(1). Available from: https://www.hfb-mgupp.com/jour/article/view/169
Pardal-Refoyo JL, Pardal-Peláez B. Gift, guest & ghost authorship in biomedical publications: definitions, prevalence, impacts, detection and prevention. Scoping review [Internet]. Research Square; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 26]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6577822/v1
Holly Else. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years — why? Nature. 2024 May 31;630(8016):280–281.
Md Somir Khan, Tozal ME. Curbing the Ramifications of Authorship Abuse in Science. ArXiv [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 July 27];abs/2504.02769. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02769
Zhichen Lin. Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science. Account Res. 2024;1–24.
Brand A, Allen L, Altman M, Hlava M, Scott J. Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learn Publ. 2015;28(2):151–155.
Allen L, Alison O’Connell, V. Kiermer. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learn Publ. 2019;32:71–74.
Mohammad Hosseini, B. Gordijn, Q. Wafford, K. Holmes, Eileen Q. Wafford. A systematic scoping review of the ethics of Contributor Role Ontologies and Taxonomies. Account Res. 2022;31:678–705.
Kiermer V. Authorship practices must evolve to support collaboration and open science. PLOS Biol. 2023 Oct 13;21(10):e3002364.
Sardi ML, Bailliet G. Derechos de autor y buenas prácticas en las publicaciones científicas. Rev Argent Antropol Biológica. 2021 Jan 1;23(1):032–032.
Ożegalska-Trybalska J. The authorship of research results and scientific publications in medical sciences. Nowotw J Oncol. 2020;70(2):73–76.
Zimba O, Gasparyan A. Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2020;58:345–349.
Faulkes Z. Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Nov 16;3(1):12.
Donev D. New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship. PRILOZI [Internet]. 2020 Feb 27 [cited 2025 July 27];0(0). Available from: https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/prilozi-2020-0015
ICMJE. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication updated October 2004. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol. 2007;2:95–119.
Alfonso F, Zelveian P, Monsuez J, M. Aschermann, Boehm M, Hernández AB, et al. Authorship: from credit to accountability. Reflections from the Editors’ Network. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108:723–729.
Tarkang EE, Kweku M, Zotor FB. Publication practices and responsible authorship: A review article. J Public Health Afr. 2017 June 23;8(1):7.
NISO CRediT Working Group. CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy [Internet]. Baltimore, MD: NISO; 2022 [cited 2025 July 26]. Available from: http://www.niso.org/publications/z39104-2022-credit
Holcombe AO, Kovacs M, Aust F, Aczel B. Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. PLOS ONE. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244611.
Holcombe A, Kovacs M, Aust F, Aczel B. Tenzing: documenting contributorship using CRediT [Internet]. OSF; 2020 [cited 2025 July 27]. Available from: https://osf.io/b6ywe_v1
Nakagawa S, Ivimey-Cook E, Grainger MJ, O’Dea RE, Burke S, Drobniak S, et al. Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2023;14. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37039-1
Boyer S, Ikeda T, Lefort MC, Malumbres-Olarte J, Schmidt JM. Percentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Nov 3;2(1):18.
Faulkes Z. Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes [Internet]. PeerJ Inc.; 2018 [cited 2025 July 27]. Available from: https://peerj.com/preprints/26987
Beshyah S, Ibrahim W, Aburawi E, Elkhammas E. The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. 2018;10:149–157.
Comité Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas. Recomendaciones para la realización, presentación, edición y publicación de trabajos académicos en revistas médicas. Acta Médica Colomb. 2015 Aug 29;40(2):57–76.
Michael Duncan. CRediT Contributor Register: A practical tool for tracking and recognising individual research contributions using the CRediT taxonomy. [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20933/100001406
K. Alpi, K. Akers. CRediT for authors of articles published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2021;109:362–4.
Kosycheva MA. CRediT Statement for Recognizing Author Contributions. Health Food Biotechnol [Internet]. 2023 July 6 [cited 2025 July 27];5(1). Available from: https://www.hfb-mgupp.com/jour/article/view/169
Pardal-Refoyo JL, Pardal-Peláez B. Gift, guest & ghost authorship in biomedical publications: definitions, prevalence, impacts, detection and prevention. Scoping review [Internet]. Research Square; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 26]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6577822/v1
Holly Else. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years — why? Nature. 2024 May 31;630(8016):280–281.
Md Somir Khan, Tozal ME. Curbing the Ramifications of Authorship Abuse in Science. ArXiv [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 July 27];abs/2504.02769. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02769
Zhichen Lin. Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science. Account Res. 2024;1–24.
Brand A, Allen L, Altman M, Hlava M, Scott J. Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learn Publ. 2015;28(2):151–155.
Allen L, Alison O’Connell, V. Kiermer. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learn Publ. 2019;32:71–74.
Mohammad Hosseini, B. Gordijn, Q. Wafford, K. Holmes, Eileen Q. Wafford. A systematic scoping review of the ethics of Contributor Role Ontologies and Taxonomies. Account Res. 2022;31:678–705.
Kiermer V. Authorship practices must evolve to support collaboration and open science. PLOS Biol. 2023 Oct 13;21(10):e3002364.
Sardi ML, Bailliet G. Derechos de autor y buenas prácticas en las publicaciones científicas. Rev Argent Antropol Biológica. 2021 Jan 1;23(1):032–032.
Ożegalska-Trybalska J. The authorship of research results and scientific publications in medical sciences. Nowotw J Oncol. 2020;70(2):73–76.
Zimba O, Gasparyan A. Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2020;58:345–349.
Faulkes Z. Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Nov 16;3(1):12.
Donev D. New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship. PRILOZI [Internet]. 2020 Feb 27 [cited 2025 July 27];0(0). Available from: https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/prilozi-2020-0015
ICMJE. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication updated October 2004. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol. 2007;2:95–119.
Alfonso F, Zelveian P, Monsuez J, M. Aschermann, Boehm M, Hernández AB, et al. Authorship: from credit to accountability. Reflections from the Editors’ Network. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108:723–729.
Tarkang EE, Kweku M, Zotor FB. Publication practices and responsible authorship: A review article. J Public Health Afr. 2017 June 23;8(1):7.
NISO CRediT Working Group. CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy [Internet]. Baltimore, MD: NISO; 2022 [cited 2025 July 26]. Available from: http://www.niso.org/publications/z39104-2022-credit
Holcombe AO, Kovacs M, Aust F, Aczel B. Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. PLOS ONE. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244611.
Holcombe A, Kovacs M, Aust F, Aczel B. Tenzing: documenting contributorship using CRediT [Internet]. OSF; 2020 [cited 2025 July 27]. Available from: https://osf.io/b6ywe_v1
Nakagawa S, Ivimey-Cook E, Grainger MJ, O’Dea RE, Burke S, Drobniak S, et al. Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2023;14. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37039-1
Boyer S, Ikeda T, Lefort MC, Malumbres-Olarte J, Schmidt JM. Percentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Nov 3;2(1):18.
Faulkes Z. Arbitration is needed to resolve scientific authorship disputes [Internet]. PeerJ Inc.; 2018 [cited 2025 July 27]. Available from: https://peerj.com/preprints/26987
Beshyah S, Ibrahim W, Aburawi E, Elkhammas E. The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. 2018;10:149–157.
Pardal-Refoyo, J. L. (2025). Guías y normas sobre autoría responsable en investigación biomédica . Revista ORL, 16(3), e33731. https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.33731
Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a
- Ángel Batuecas-Caletrío, José Ignacio Benito-Orejas, José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Guía de rehabilitación vestibular , Revista ORL: Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020)
- José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Beatriz Pardal-Peláez, Anotaciones para estructurar una revisión sistemática , Revista ORL: Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2020)
- Ángel Batuecas-Caletrío, Santiago Santa Cruz Ruiz, José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Atlas de otoscopia para estudiantes , Revista ORL: Vol. 13 Núm. S1 (2022): Atlas de otoscopia para estudiantes
- José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Los artículos de revisión. Orientaciones para los autores y revisores , Revista ORL: Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2023)
- José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Guía de cuidados en Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvicofacial , Revista ORL: LIBROS / MONOGRAFÍAS
- José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Carlos Ochoa-Sangrador, Revisiones sistemáticas , Revista ORL: Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2017)
- José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Beatriz Pardal-Peláez, Listas guía EQUATOR para la presentación de informes de investigación. Herramienta GoodReports , Revista ORL: Segovia 2018
- Alba Bartolomé-Alonso, José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Revisión sobre prevención y tratamiento de la mucositis oral en cáncer de cabeza y cuello , Revista ORL: Vol. 10 Núm. 4 (2019)
- Fernando Calles-Sánchez, José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Prevalencia de la disfagia orofaríngea en pacientes adultos. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis , Revista ORL: Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2023)
- José Luis Pardal-Refoyo, ÍNDICE 2016 , Revista ORL: Volumen recopilatorio 7 (n. 1, 2, 3 y 4)
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
+
−