Validación de profesionales expertos de un instrumento sobre comunidades virtuales de atención temprana

Resumen

Las interacciones y el aprendizaje online influyen en el desempeño laboral, proliferando comunidades virtuales de práctica que respaldan el desarrollo profesional. Este estudio persigue evaluar, mediante el método Delphi, un instrumento que mide la percepción de especialistas en atención temprana sobre la incidencia de comunidades virtuales en su desarrollo profesional. Se diseñó un cuestionario basado en la literatura y se contactó con 13 expertos, aplicando el Coeficiente de competencia experta (K). Un panel Delphi de alta experticia (K =.86) evaluó en dos rondas la relevancia y la exactitud de los ítems con una escala Likert de 1 a 5 y su pertinencia con respuestas dicotómicas. La evidencia de validez de contenido se evaluó mediante la V de Aiken y sus intervalos de confianza, estableciendo V ≥.81 e IC ≥.50 como criterios para mantener los ítems. Como resultado, en la primera ronda, se evaluaron 60 ítems, seleccionando 49; en la segunda, estos alcanzaron V ≥.81, resultando en un cuestionario final de 49 ítems. Se concluye que los resultados del cuestionario muestran suficientes evidencias de validez de contenido en términos de relevancia, exactitud y pertinencia, confirmando la utilidad del Coeficiente K y el método Delphi para el objetivo propuesto.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Akinyemi, A. F., Rembe, S., Shumba, J. y Adewumi, T. M. (2019). Collaboration and mutual support as processes established by communities of practice to improve continuing professional teachers’ development in high schools. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1685446. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1685446

Alonso, P. e Izquierdo, T. (2022). Integración de herramientas web 2.0 en los sitios de especialidades y temas de salud para el desarrollo de comunidades virtuales de práctica en la red Infomed. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 2(1,121). https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2022121

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education. (AERA) (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.

Andrade, A. y Carvalho, C. V. (2015). To enliven virtual communities of practice through gamification. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Serious Games, 1(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4108/sg.1.4.e6

Asociación Española de Intervención en la Primera Infancia. (s/f). Teams. Comunidad AEIPI. https://aeipiorg.wordpress.com/teams-comunidad-aeipi/

Aybek, E. C. y Toraman, C. (2022). How many response categories are sufficient for Likert type scales? An empirical study based on the Item Response Theory. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 534-547. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1132931

Bagnato, S. J., Macy, M., Dionne, C., Smith, N., Brock, J. R., Larson, T. K., Londono, T., Fevola, A., Bruder, M. B. y Cranmer, J. (2023). Authentic Assessment for Early Childhood Intervention: In-Vivo and virtual practices for interdisciplinary professionals. Perspectives on Early Childhood Psychology Education, 8(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.58948/2834-8257.1066

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). (2022/06/27). Primeros Pasos. Desarrollo Infantil. https://blogs.iadb.org/desarrollo-infantil/es/comunidad-de-practica-que-pasa-cuando-se-reunen-expertos-comprometidos-con-el-desarrollo-infantil-temprano/

Barry, M., Kuijer‐Siebelink, W., Nieuwenhuis, L. y Scherpbier‐de Haan, N. (2017). Communities of practice: A means to support occupational therapists’ continuing professional development. A literature review. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12334

Berk, R. A. (1990). Importance of expert judgment in content-related validity evidence. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 12(5), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599001200507

Bisquerra, R. (2009). Metodología de la investigación educativa. La Muralla.

Bogdanovskaya, I. M., Uglova, A. B., Nizomutdinov, B. A. y Petrova, J. V. (2024). Analysis of ethical risks in interactions within professional networking communities for helping professionals. En 2024 Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS) (pp. 16-20). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10502104

Brazil, V., Stokes-Parish, J. y Spurr, J. (2023). Role of social media in health professions education. En D. Nestel, G. Reedy, L. McKenna y S. Gough (Eds.), Clinical education for the health professions (pp. 765-776). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3344-0_119

Bull, C., Crilly, J., Latimer, S. y Gillespie, B. M. (2022). Establishing the content validity of a new emergency department patient-reported experience measure (ED PREM): A Delphi study. BMC Emergency Medicine, 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00617-5

Cabero Almenara, J. y Barroso Osuna, J. (2013). La utilización del juicio de expertos para la evaluación de TIC: El coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 65(2), 25-38. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/brp.2013.65202

Cea D’Ancona, M. A. (2001). Metodología cuantitativa. Estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Síntesis.

Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assesssments, 6(4), 284-290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

Cruz, M. y Martínez, M. C. (2020). Origen y desarrollo de un índice de competencia experta: el coeficiente k. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de la Investigación Social, 19(10), 40-56. https://relmis.com.ar/ojs/index.php/relmis/article/view/origen_desarrollo_indice_competencia_experta

Damjanovic, V. y Ward, J. K. (2023). Communities of practice as a launchpad for social justice planning in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 24(3), 363-368. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/14639491231155554

Dašić, D. R. (2023). Application of Delphi method in sports. Спорт, медији и бизнис, 9(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.58984/smb2301059d

Ding, C. y Hershberger, S. (2002). Assessing content validity and content equivalence using structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_7

Drumm, S., Bradley, C. y Moriarty, F. (2022a). ‘More of an art than a science’? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi technique. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(1), 2230-2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027

Drumm, S., Bradley, C. y Moriarty, F. (2022b). An overview of the Delphi technique in social pharmacy and health services research. Contemporary Research Methods in Pharmacy and Health Services, 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91888-6.00001-6

Dunn, J. G. H., Bouffard, M. y Rogers, W. T. (1999). Assessing content-relevance in sport psychology scale-construction research: Issues and recommendations. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0301_2

Ferreira, M. M. (2013). Formação contínua de professores em contextos laborais colaborativos – seus reflexos nas conceções e práticas profissionais (Tesis doctoral, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa). https://hdl.handle.net/10451/8744

GAT. (2005). Libro Blanco de Atención Temprana. ARTEGRAF. https://gat-atenciontemprana.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/LibroBlancoAtenci%C2%A6nTemprana.pdf

GAT. (2019). Atención temprana. La visión de los profesionales. https://gat-atenciontemprana.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/%C3%A2%C2%81%C2%AE-La-visi%C3%B3n-de-los-profesionales.pdf

Ghamrawi, N. (2022). Teachers’ virtual communities of practice: A strong response in times of crisis or just another Fad? Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 5889-5915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10857-w

Gill, F. J., Leslie, G. D., Grech, C. y Latour, J. M. (2013). Using a web-based survey tool to undertake a Delphi study: Application for nurse education research. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1322-1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.016

Graziani, E. y Petrini, F. (2018). Online communities. Benefits and risks: A literature review. International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare (IJUDH), 8(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4515-0.ch003

Harjusola-Webb, S., Lyons, A. y Gatmaitan, M. (2014). A community of practice pilot project for delivering early intervention professional development. Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach, 4(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.15388/SW.2014.28246

Hernández-Peña, K., Gea-García, G. M. y Antúnez, R. M. (2024). Diseño y validación mediante el método Delphi de un cuestionario para conocer los criterios del jugador de baloncesto cuando penetra hacia la canasta. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 24(1), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.544011

Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2018). Aspectos educativos y formativos de la atención infantil temprana en comunidades virtuales [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Granada]. https://hdl.handle.net/10481/52502

Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., Nogueira, F. y Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2017). Professional development through social network communities. In EDULEARN17 Proceedings (pp. 2930-2938). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.1612

Imbernón, F. y Canto, P. J. (2013). La formación y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado en España y Latinoamérica. Sinéctica, 41, 2-12. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1665-109X2013000200010&script=sci_arttext

Indarwati, F., Primanda, Y., Haris, F. y Sutrisno, R. Y. (2023). Content validity and inter-rater reliability of procedural skill checklists used in the online OSCE scoring management system. Bali Medical Journal, 12(1), 456-461. https://www.doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i1.3760

Ismail, K., Ishak, R. y Kamaruddin, S. H. (2021). Development of professional learning communities model using fuzzy Delphi approach. TEM Journal, 10(2), 872-878. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM102-48

Khalid, M. S. y Strange, M. H. (2016). School teacher professional development in online communities of practice: A systematic literature review. En Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 605-614). Academic Conferences and Publishing International. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/school-teacher-professional-development-in-online-communities-of-

Krille, C. (2020). Reasons for participation in professional development. En C. Krille (Ed.), Teachers’ Participation in Professional Development: A systematic review (pp. 15-25). Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38844-7_3

Landeta, J. (2002). El método Delphi: Una técnica de previsión del futuro. Ariel.

Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M. y Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008

Lawler, M. A., Lindsay, G. M. y Jones, R. A. (2023). From ‘quarantini party’ to academic impact: An early childhood visual arts special interest group becomes a community of practice. Practice, 5(2), 144-160. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2023.2215937

Lotfaliany, M., Agustini, B., Walker, A. J., Turner, A., Wrobel, A. L., Williams, L. J., Dean, O. M., Miles, S., Rossell, S. L., Berk, M., Mohebbi, M. y HDQ Investigator Group. (2024). Development of a harmonized sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire for mental health research: A Delphi-method-based consensus recommendation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 58(8) 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241253452

Luhanga, U., Chen, W., Minor, S., Drowos, J., Berry, A., Rudd, M., Gupta, S. y Bailey, J. M. (2022). Promoting transfer of learning to practice in online continuing professional development. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 42(4), 269-273. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000393

Montes, R., Zuheros, C., Morales, J., Zermeño, N., Duran, J. y Herrera, F. (2023). Design and consensus content validity of the questionnaire for b-learning education: A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Delphi based decision support tool. Applied Soft Computing, 147, 110755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110755

Murua, I., Gallego, D. J. y Cacheiro, M. L. (2015). Caracterización de las cibercomunidades de aprendizaje (cCA). Revista de Educación a Distancia, 47(4), 1-18. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/242451/184261

Nuuyoma, V. (2024). Virtual communities of practice as mentoring tools in health professions education and practice. En D. Smerda-Mason y D. J. Koch, Utilizing virtual communities in professional practice (pp. 182-205). IGI Global. https://www.doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1111-0.ch009

Parejo, J. L. L., Cáceres-Iglesias, J., Manrique-Benito, M. y Cortón-Heras, M. O. (2024). Application of the Delphi technique to a questionnaire on out-of-classroom training in initial teacher education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2024.2310286

Penfield, R. D. y Giacobbi, P. R. (2004). Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

Permana, R. A. H. A. y Widodo, A. (2022). Validity and inter-rater reliability of the scoring rubrics for the science teacher TPACK test instrument. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 8(1), 27-44. https://www.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v8i1.11164

Plena inclusión. (2020). Únete a la comunidad de Atención Temprana de Plena inclusión en Facebook. https://www.plenainclusion.org/noticias/unete-a-la-comunidad-de-atencion-temprana-de-plena-inclusion-en-facebook/

Rolls, K., Hansen, M., Jackson, D. y Elliott, D. (2016). How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: An integrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e166. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5312

Sablatzky, T. (2022). The Delphi method. Hypothesis, 34(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.18060/26224

Schroeder, P. (2018). New technology is giving learning and development a bright future. The Startup, 13 January. https://medium.com/swlh/new-technology-is-giving-learning-and-development-a-bright-future-f0aec84dad00

Silwal, R. y Panta, S. (2021). Factors influencing participation in professional developmental activities among nursing personnel. Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital, 20(1), 24-29. https://www.doi.org/10.3126/MJSBH.V20I1.29061

Slocumb, E. M. y Cole, F. L. (1991). A practical approach to content validation. Applied Nursing Research, 4(4), 192-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80097-7

Stribing, A., Stodden, D. F., Monsma, E., Lieberman, L. J. y Brian, A. S. (2022). Content/face validity of motor skill perception questionnaires for youth with visual impairments: A Delphi method. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 40(2), 369-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619621990687

Trust T., Krutka, D. G. y Carpenter, J. P. (2016). ‘Together we are better’: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers and Education, 102, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007

Widman, F. (2021). Desarrollo profesional de profesores de matemáticas en ambientes virtuales: ventajas, aproximaciones teóricas y futuras líneas de investigación. Educación Matemática, 33(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.24844/em3302.09

Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 22, 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953

Zhang, X., Admiraal, W. y Saab, N. (2021). Teachers’ motivation to participate in continuous professional development: Relationship with factors at the personal and school level. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(5), 714-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1942804
Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2025). Validación de profesionales expertos de un instrumento sobre comunidades virtuales de atención temprana. Siglo Cero, 56(2), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.14201/scero.32055

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
+