La cientifización de la raza: el carácter pseudocientífico de las disciplinas
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Cantor, Geoffrey N. (1975). Phrenology in Early Nineteenth-Century Edinburgh: An Historiographical Discussion. Annals of Science, 32(3), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797500200251
Fabian, Ann (2010). The Skull Collectors: Race, Science, and America's Unburied Dead. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226233499.001.0001
Giménez-Roldán, Santiago (2016). Paul Broca's search for Basque skulls: The full story. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 25(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2014.886811
Gobineau, Arthur de (1915). The Inequiality of Human Races. London: William Heinemann.
Goode, Erich (2013). Paranormalism and Pseudoscience as Deviance. En M. Pigliucci y M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience (pp. 145-164). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0009
Gómez Rodríguez, Amparo (2004). La estirpe maldita: la construcción científica de lo femenino. Madrid: Minerva Ediciones.
Gould, Stephen Jay (1996). The Mismeasure of Man (Revised and Expanded). Nueva York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Gregory, Jane y Miller, Steven (1998). Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility. Cambridge: Basic Books.
Hansson, Sven O. (2013). Defining Pseudoscience and Science. En M. Pigliucci y M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience (pp. 61-77). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Jahoda, Gustav (2009). Intra-European Racism in Nineteenth-Century Anthropology. History and Anthropology, 20(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757200802654258
Kaufman, Matthew H. (1998). The Edinburgh Phrenological Debate of 1823 Held in the Royal Medical Society. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(4), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(98)00025-6
Lapouge, Georges Vacher de (1899). L'Aryen: Son Role Social. París: Albert Fontemoing.
Lapouge, Georges Vacher de (1909). Race et Milieu Social : Essais d'Anthroposociologie. Paris: Marcel Riviére.
Laudan, Larry (1983). The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. En R. S. Cohen y L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (vol. 76). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6
Lieberman, Leonard (2001). How "Caucasoids" Got Such Big Crania and Why They Shrank. Current Anthropology, 42(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1086/318434
Lombroso, Cesare (1911). Crime: Its Causes and Remedies. London: William Heinemann.
Lombroso, Cesare (2006). Criminal Man. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387800
López Cerezo, José Antonio y Luján López, José Luis (1989). El artefacto de la inteligencia. Barcelona, España: Anthropos.
Lyons, Sherrie (1998). Science or Pseudoscience: Phrenology as a Cautionary Tale for Evolutionary Psychology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 41(4), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1998.0027
Nott, Josiah C. y Gliddon, George R. (1854). Types of Mankind. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Grambo & Co.
Ripley, William Z. (1915). The Races of Europe: A Sociological Study. New York: D. Appleton & Company.
Sakalauskaitė-Juodeikienė, Eglė, Eling, Paul y Finger, Stanley (2017). The reception of Gall's organology in early-nineteenth-century Vilnius. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 26(4), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2017.1332561
Shapin, Steven (1975). Phrenological Knowledge and the Social Structure of Early Nineteenth-Century Edinburgh. Annals of Science, 32(3), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797500200261
Shermer, Michael (2013). Science and Pseudoscience: The Difference in Practice and the Difference it Makes. En M. Pigliucci y M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience (pp. 121-144). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sysling, Fenneke (2018). Science and self-assessment: phrenological charts 1840-1940. British Society for the History of Science, 51(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087418000055
Thomassen, Jacob L. y Beierholm, Simon (2020). Franz Joseph Gall came to Copenhagen, and for a brief moment the brain was the talk of the town. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 29(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2019.1684777
Thurs, Daniel P. y Numbers, Ronald L. (2013). Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-Called. En M. Pigliucci y M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience (pp. 121-144). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0008
Van Wyhe, John (2004). Was Phrenology a Reform Science? Towards a New Generalization for Phrenology. History of Science, 42, 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530404200303
Whitaker, Harry y Jarema, Gonia (2017). The split between Gall and Spurzheim (1813-1818). Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 26(2), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2016.1204807