Detecting Spam Review through Spammer’s Behavior Analysis

Article Sidebar

PDF

ISSN online: 2255-2863

Prefijo Doi: 10.14201

Main Article Content

Naveed Hussain
The Comsats University
Pakistan
Biography
Hamid Turab Mirza
Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad (Lahore Campus), Pakistan
Pakistan
Biography
Ibrar Hussain
Department of Software Engineering, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Pakistan
Biography
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019), Articles, pages 61-71
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/ADCAIJ2019826171
Accepted: Feb 24, 2020
Copyright

Abstract

Online reviews about the purchase of a product or services provided have become the main source of user opinions. To gain profit or fame usually spam reviews are written to promote or demote some target products or services. This practice is known as review spamming. In the last few years, different methods have been suggested to solve the problem of review spamming but there is still a need to introduce new spam review detection method to improve accuracy results. In this work, researchers have studied six different spammer behavioral features and analyzed the proposed spam review detection method using weight method. An experimental evaluation was conducted on a benchmark dataset and achieved 84.5% accuracy.

Keywords:

Online Product Reviews, Spam Reviews, Spam Review Detection, Opinion Spam, Customer Reviews, Spammer Behavioral features

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Hussain, N., Turab Mirza, H., Rasool, G., Hussain, I., & Kaleem, M. (2019). Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 9(5), 987.

Bajaj, S., Garg, N., & Singh, S.

K. (2017). A Novel User-based Spam Review Detection. Procedia Computer Science, 122, (pp. 1009-1015).

Biradar, J. G. (2017). The exponential Distribution model for Review Spam Detection. International Journal of

Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(3), pp. 938-947.

Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., & Glance, N. S. (2013). What yelp fake review filter might be doing? In: International Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 409-418).

Fusilier, D. H., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., & Cabrera, R. G. (2015). Detecting positive and negative deceptive opinions using PU-learning. Information processing & management, 51(4), 433-443.

Ong, T., Mannino, M., & Gregg, D. (2014). Linguistic characteristics of shill reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13(2), (pp.69-78).

Dematis, I., Karapistoli, E., & Vakali, A. (2018). Fake Review Detection via Exploitation of Spam Indicators and Reviewer Behavior Characteristics. In: International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and

Practice of Informatics (pp. 581-595). Edizioni Della Normale, Cham.

Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2008, February). Opinion spam and analysis. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 219-230). ACM..

Liu, B., & Zhang, L. (2012). A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Mining text data (pp. 415- 463). Springer US.

Zhou, S., Qiao, Z., Du, Q., Wang, G. A., Fan, W., & Yan, X. (2018). Measuring Customer Agility from Online Reviews Using Big Data Text Analytics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2),

(pp.510-539).

Chakraborty, M., Pal, S., Pramanik, R., & Chowdary, C. R. (2016). Recent developments in social spam detection and combating techniques: A survey. Information Processing & Management, 52(6),

(pp.1053-1073).

Mukherjee, A., Kumar, A., Liu, B., Wang, J., Hsu, M., Castellanos, M., & Ghosh, R. (2013). Spotting opinion

spammers using behavioral footprints. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international

conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 632-640). ACM..

Heydari, A., Tavakoli, M., & Salim, N. (2016). Detection of fake opinions using time series. Expert Systems with Applications, 58, (pp. 83-92).

KC, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2016). On the temporal dynamics of opinion spamming: Case studies on Yelp. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 369-379). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

Li, H., Fei, G., Wang, S., Liu, B., Shao, W., Mukherjee, A., & Shao, J. (2017). Bimodal distribution and co-bursting in review spam detection. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1063-1072).

Kaghazgaran, P., Caverlee, J., & Alfifi, M. (2017, May). Behavioral Analysis of Review Fraud: Linking Malicious Crowdsourcing to Amazon and Beyond. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

Viviani, M., & Pasi, G. (2017). Quantifier guided aggregation for the veracity assessment of online reviews. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(5), 481-501.

Wang, Zhuo, Songmin Gu, and Xiaowei Xu. "GSLDA: LDA-based group acc detection in product reviews." Applied Intelligence 48.9 (2018): 3094-3107.

Kaghazgaran, P., Caverlee, J., & Squicciarini, A. (2018,February). Combating crowdsourced review

manipulators: A neighborhood-based approach. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 306-314). ACM.

Ganesan, K., & Zhai, C. (2012). Opinion-based entity ranking. Information retrieval, 15(2), 116-150.

Hazim, M., Anuar, N. B., Ab Razak, M. F., & Abdullah, N. A. (2018). Detecting opinion spams through supervised boosting approach. PloS one, 13(6), e0198884.

Zhou, W., Liu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2017, December). Detecting Spammer Communities Using Network Structural Features. In International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications

and Work-sharing (pp. 670-679). Springer, Cham

Asadi, R., Kareem, S. A., Asadi, M., & Asadi, S. (2015). A single-layer semi-supervised feed forward neural network clustering method. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 28(3), (pp.189-212)

Pudaruth, S., Moheeputh, S., Permessur, N., & Chamroo, A. (2018). Sentiment Analysis from Facebook Comments using Automatic Coding in NVivo 11, ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal Regular Issue, Vol. 7 N. 1, (pp. 41-48)