Three Theories, Three Realisms: Zola, Galdós, James
Abstract These three author’s lifespans and historical contexts coincide, and they are thus subject to similar influences. This article analyses their response to this shared experience in terms of the theory and practice of realism. Zola’s genetic realism is based on the relationship between the writer and his surroundings, understood to be possible to observe and faithfully reproduce. James’s formal realism centers on the literary: the work of art constitutes a reality unconnected to the referent, a textual reality. There remains, lastly, the reception of the work, the reader’s perspective. Galdos’s literary thought can be seen in this context as moving towards an intentional realism, a conception of realism as an effect or as a response which should be experienced, not as a mere copy or purely immanent creation. This is a realism that is never an essence, but exists solely in its action.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Villanueva Prieto, D. (2011). Three Theories, Three Realisms: Zola, Galdós, James. 1616: Anuario De Literatura Comparada, 1, 267–291. Retrieved from https://revistas.usal.es/dos/index.php/1616_Anuario_Literatura_Comp/article/view/8348
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Darío Villanueva Prieto, Table of contents , 1616: Anuario de Literatura Comparada: Vol. 3 (2013): Worlding Literatures in Portuguese
- Darío Villanueva Prieto, Sumario Analítico , 1616: Anuario de Literatura Comparada: Vol. 3 (2013): Worlding Literatures in Portuguese
- Darío Villanueva Prieto, Aviso del director , 1616: Anuario de Literatura Comparada: Vol. 1 (2011): Xenografías
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
+
−