Three Theories, Three Realisms: Zola, Galdós, James

Abstract

These three author’s lifespans and historical contexts coincide, and they are thus subject to similar influences. This article analyses their response to this shared experience in terms of the theory and practice of realism. Zola’s genetic realism is based on the relationship between the writer and his surroundings, understood to be possible to observe and faithfully reproduce. James’s formal realism centers on the literary: the work of art constitutes a reality unconnected to the referent, a textual reality. There remains, lastly, the reception of the work, the reader’s perspective. Galdos’s literary thought can be seen in this context as moving towards an intentional realism, a conception of realism as an effect or as a response which should be experienced, not as a mere copy or purely immanent creation. This is a realism that is never an essence, but exists solely in its action.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Villanueva Prieto, D. (2011). Three Theories, Three Realisms: Zola, Galdós, James. 1616: Anuario De Literatura Comparada, 1, 267–291. Retrieved from https://revistas.usal.es/dos/index.php/1616_Anuario_Literatura_Comp/article/view/8348

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Darío Villanueva Prieto

,
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Departamento de Literatura española, Teoría da literatura e Lingüística xeral. Facultade de Filoloxía. Campus Norte - Burgo das Nacións. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. 15782 - Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (España)
+