Guimarães Rosa: the transcendence of realism

Abstract

Rosa’s writing transcends Realism by indetermining the representations in the form. According to Hansen (2012) in emForma literária e crítica da lógica racionalista em Guimarães Rosa/em, Rosa’s literary fiction indetermines the representations in the form of a background that produces mystery. We point out some operations of indeterminacy in the short story emHiato/em, from emTutaméia: terceiras estórias/em. With a fiction of the form, Rosa intervenes in the universal literary field and also in the Brazilian. This paper points that, in the cultural formation of the reception, two points of Rosa’s intervention in the Brazilian literary field in which the predilection by Realism and the sacred imaginary live together. Rosa attends partially to the reception formed in the literate culture and inured to Realist representations. She extrapolates its expectations by encompassing, simultaneously, the sacred imaginary. Rosa intervenes in a historical project of adequacy of the imaginary to Realist patterns of representation. Universal literary fiction has as challenge producing the meaning of realities more and more complex with the tongue that, domesticated in representations, reiterates the places of language in the society of classes. Since XIX century, writers face the difficulty of proposing valid representations in a world of increasing diversity and the Brazilian literary field requires the representation of the national reality. The intervention of Rosa’s fiction in this project of representation covers the sacred imaginary of the reception which, inured to the form as method of formulating desire and practice in language, welcomes the effects of indeterminacy as mystery.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
BARTHES, R. (2012). O discurso da história. Em: O rumor da língua. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. pp. 163-180.

BARTHES, R. (1979). Loiola Em: Sade, Fourier, Loiola . São Paulo: Livraria Martins Fontes – Edições 70. (Coleção Signos). pp.45-78.

BOSI, A. (1992). Colônia, culto e cultura. Em: Dialética da colonização. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. pp. 11-63.

BUENO, L. (2006). Introdução. Em: Uma história do romance de 30 . São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo: Campinas: Editora da Unicamp. pp. 11-30.

CAIXETA, Maryllu de Oliveira. (2015). Hiato: a pause in darkness to reflect the future. Journal of literature and art studies , vol. 5, nº 5, may. pp.1-9

CANDIDO, A. (2003). A nova narrativa. Em: A educação pela noite e outros ensaios . São Paulo: Ática. pp. 199-215

CERVANTES, Miguel de. (2015). Don Quijote de la Mancha . Barcelona: Penguin Random House – Real Academia Española.

COSTA LIMA, L. (2007). Trilogia do controle. Rio de Janeiro: Topbooks.

COSTA LIMA, L. (2006). História. Ficção. Literatura. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

DANIEL, M. L. (1968). Guimarães Rosa: Travessia literária. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio.

GARCÍA MATEO, Rogelio (1999). Don Quijote de la Mancha e Iñigo de Loyola em Unamuno según la “Vida de Don Quijote y Sancho”. Actas del VIII Coloquio Internacional de la Asociación de Cervantistas, Ayuntamiento de El Toboso . pp. 127-142.

GALÁN, Cerezo. (1996). La máscara de lo trágico. Fílosofía y tragedia en Miguel de Unamuno . Madrid, Trolla.

HOLANDA, S. B. (1976). Raízes do Brasil . Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio Editora.

HANSEN, J. A. (2012). Forma literária e crítica da lógica racionalista em Guimarães Rosa. Letras de Hoje , 47 (2), abr./ jun. pp. 120-130.

MULLAN, Elder. (2004). Prefácio. Em: Os exercícios espirituais de Inácio de Loyola . São Paulo: Madras. pp.23-25.

ROSA, João Guimarães. (1979). Terceiras estórias: Tutaméia . Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio.

SCHWARZ, Roberto. (1990). U m mestre na periferia do capitalismo: Machado de Assis. São Paulo: Duas Cidades.

SÜSSEKIND, Flora (1984). Tal Brasil, qual romance? Rio de Janeiro: Achiamé.

TELLECHEA, José (2000). Ignacio de Loyola, solo y a pie. Salamanca: Sígueme.
De Oliveira Caixeta, M. (2016). Guimarães Rosa: the transcendence of realism. Revista De Estudios Brasileños, 3(4), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.14201/reb2016347385

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maryllu De Oliveira Caixeta

,
Universidade de São Paulo
Postdoctoral student at the Postgraduate Program in Literature of the Department of Classical and Vernacular Languages, Faculty of Philosophy, Languages and Human Sciences, University of São Paulo.
+