Una ontología parte-dependiente de la individualidad biológica para los consorcios de múltiples especies
Resumen Este artículo introduce y defiende una ontología parte-dependiente para concebir la individualidad biológica en los conglomerados formados por individuos de múltiples especies. Según la ontología parte-dependiente, la caracterización de un conjunto o conglomerado de taxones independientes como individuo biológico debe basarse en la relación que una parte específica de ese conjunto mantiene con el resto, siendo irrelevante la relación que el resto de partes del conjunto mantienen con la primera. De otro modo, se argumenta que las relaciones de dependencia biológica entre las partes de un conjunto pueden ser asimétricas, sin que esto afecte a la atribución de individualidad a dicho conjunto. Se señala, asimismo, que tal caracterización parte-dependiente es válida no solo para las ideas de individualidad basadas en la evolución, sino también para aquellas basadas en la fisiología, o la inmunología, entre otras. Esto hace a la ontología parte-dependiente compatible con el pluralismo sobre la individualidad biológica.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Baedke, J. (2019). What Is a Biological Individual? En J. Martín-Durán y B. Vellutini (eds.), Old Questions and Young Approaches to Animal Evolution. Fascinating Life Sciences. Cham: Springer.
Clarke, E. (2010). The problem of biological individuality. Biological Theory, 5(4), 312-325.
Deulofeu, R., Suárez, J. (2018). When Mechanisms Are Not Enough: The Origin of Eukaryotes and Scientific Explanation. En A. Christian, D. Hommen, N. Retzlaff y G. Schurz (eds.), Philosophy of Science. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 9. Cham: Springer.
DiFrisco, J. (2017). Kinds of biological individuals: Sortals, projectability, and selection. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(3), 845-875.
Dupré, J., O’Malley, M.A. (2009). Varieties of living things: Life at the intersection of lineage and metabolism. Philosophy, Theory and Practice in Biology, 1, 1.
Engelhard, K., Feldbacher-Escamilla, C.J., Gebharter, A., Seide, A. (2021). Inductive Metaphysics, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 98(1), 1-26.
French, S., McKenzie, K. (2015). Rethinking outside the toolbox: Reflecting again on the relationship between philosophy of science and metaphysics. En T. Bigaj, y C. Wüthrich (eds.), Metaphysics in contemporary physics, Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 104, pp. 25-54). Brill: Rodopi.
Gilbert, S., Sapp, J., Tauber, A. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 325-341.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2011). Agents and acacias: replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller. Biology & Philosophy, 26(4), 501-515.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2013). Darwinian individuals. En F. Bouchard y P. Huneman (eds.), From group to individuals: Evolution and emerging individuality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Haber, M. (2016). The biological and the mereological: Metaphysical implications of the individuality thesis. En A. Guay y T. Pradeu (eds.), Individuals across the sciences (pp. 295-316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huneman, P. (2014). Individuality as a Theoretical Scheme. I. Formal and Material Concepts of Individuality. Biological Theory, 9, 361-373.
Kaiser, M. (2018). Individuating part-whole relations in the biological world. En O. Bueno, R.-L. Chen, M. Fagan (eds.), Individuation, process and scientific practices (pp. 63-90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaiser, M. (2019). Normativity in the philosophy of science. Metaphilosophy, 50, 36-62.
Lidgard, S., Nyhart, L.K. (2017). Biological individuality: Integrating scientific, historical and philosophical perspectives. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, E. A. (2017). Units and levels of selection. En E. N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection-units/
Lloyd, E. A., Wade, M. J. (2019). Criteria for Holobionts from Community Genetics. Biological Theory, 14(3), 151-70.
Martín-Villuendas, M. (2021). Una reconsideración pluralista del concepto de herencia. Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26(3), 25-47.
Mendoza, M. L. Z., Xiong, Z., Escalera-Zamudio, M., et al. (2018). Hologenomic adaptations underlying the evolution of sanguivory in the common vampire bat. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2, 659-668.
Molter, D.J. (2019). On mycorrhizal individuality. Biology and Philosophy, 34, 34-52.
Moran, N. (2006). Symbiosis. Current Biology, 16(20), R866-71.
Morillas, L., Roales, J., Cruz, C., Munzi, S. (2022). Lichen as Multipartner Symbiotic Relationships. Encyclopedia, 2(3), 1421-1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2030096
Okasha, S. (2018). Agents and Goals in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olszak, T., An, D., et al. (2012). Microbial exposure during early life has persistent effects on natural killer T cell function. Science, 336, 489-493.
Pradeu, T. (2010). What is an organism? An immunological answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(3), 227-247.
Pradeu, T. (2012). The limits of the self: Immunology and biological identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pradeu, T. (2016). The many faces of biological individuality. Biology and Philosophy, 31, 761-773.
Pradeu, T. (2020). Philosophy of biology: immunology and individuality. eLife, 8, e47384.
Smith, S. (2017). Organisms as persisters. Philosophy, Theory and Practice in Biology, 9, 14.
Stappenbeck, T.S., Hooper, L.V., et al. (2002). Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells. PNAS, 99, 15451-15455.
Suárez, J. (2019). The Hologenome Concept of Evolution: A Philosophical and Biological Study. PhD Dissertation. University of Exeter.
Suárez, J. (2020). The stability of traits conception of the hologenome: An evolutionary account of holobiont individuality. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 42, 11.
Suárez, J. (2021). El Holobionte/Hologenoma Como Nivel de Selección: Una Aproximación a La Evolución de Los Consorcios de Múltiples Especies. Theoria, 36(1), 81-112.
Suárez, J., Stencel, A. (2020). A part-dependent account of biological individuality: Why holobionts are individuals and ecosystems simultaneously. Biological Reviews, 95(5), 1308-1324.
Suárez, J., Triviño, V. (2020). What Is a Hologenomic Adaptation? Emergent Individuality and Inter-Identity in Multispecies Systems. Front. Psychol., 11, 187.
Triviño, V., Suárez, J. (2020). Holobionts: ecological communities, hybrids, or biological individuals? A metaphysical perspective on multispecies systems. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 84, 101323.
Clarke, E. (2010). The problem of biological individuality. Biological Theory, 5(4), 312-325.
Deulofeu, R., Suárez, J. (2018). When Mechanisms Are Not Enough: The Origin of Eukaryotes and Scientific Explanation. En A. Christian, D. Hommen, N. Retzlaff y G. Schurz (eds.), Philosophy of Science. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 9. Cham: Springer.
DiFrisco, J. (2017). Kinds of biological individuals: Sortals, projectability, and selection. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(3), 845-875.
Dupré, J., O’Malley, M.A. (2009). Varieties of living things: Life at the intersection of lineage and metabolism. Philosophy, Theory and Practice in Biology, 1, 1.
Engelhard, K., Feldbacher-Escamilla, C.J., Gebharter, A., Seide, A. (2021). Inductive Metaphysics, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 98(1), 1-26.
French, S., McKenzie, K. (2015). Rethinking outside the toolbox: Reflecting again on the relationship between philosophy of science and metaphysics. En T. Bigaj, y C. Wüthrich (eds.), Metaphysics in contemporary physics, Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 104, pp. 25-54). Brill: Rodopi.
Gilbert, S., Sapp, J., Tauber, A. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 325-341.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2011). Agents and acacias: replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller. Biology & Philosophy, 26(4), 501-515.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2013). Darwinian individuals. En F. Bouchard y P. Huneman (eds.), From group to individuals: Evolution and emerging individuality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Haber, M. (2016). The biological and the mereological: Metaphysical implications of the individuality thesis. En A. Guay y T. Pradeu (eds.), Individuals across the sciences (pp. 295-316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huneman, P. (2014). Individuality as a Theoretical Scheme. I. Formal and Material Concepts of Individuality. Biological Theory, 9, 361-373.
Kaiser, M. (2018). Individuating part-whole relations in the biological world. En O. Bueno, R.-L. Chen, M. Fagan (eds.), Individuation, process and scientific practices (pp. 63-90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaiser, M. (2019). Normativity in the philosophy of science. Metaphilosophy, 50, 36-62.
Lidgard, S., Nyhart, L.K. (2017). Biological individuality: Integrating scientific, historical and philosophical perspectives. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, E. A. (2017). Units and levels of selection. En E. N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection-units/
Lloyd, E. A., Wade, M. J. (2019). Criteria for Holobionts from Community Genetics. Biological Theory, 14(3), 151-70.
Martín-Villuendas, M. (2021). Una reconsideración pluralista del concepto de herencia. Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26(3), 25-47.
Mendoza, M. L. Z., Xiong, Z., Escalera-Zamudio, M., et al. (2018). Hologenomic adaptations underlying the evolution of sanguivory in the common vampire bat. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2, 659-668.
Molter, D.J. (2019). On mycorrhizal individuality. Biology and Philosophy, 34, 34-52.
Moran, N. (2006). Symbiosis. Current Biology, 16(20), R866-71.
Morillas, L., Roales, J., Cruz, C., Munzi, S. (2022). Lichen as Multipartner Symbiotic Relationships. Encyclopedia, 2(3), 1421-1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2030096
Okasha, S. (2018). Agents and Goals in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olszak, T., An, D., et al. (2012). Microbial exposure during early life has persistent effects on natural killer T cell function. Science, 336, 489-493.
Pradeu, T. (2010). What is an organism? An immunological answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(3), 227-247.
Pradeu, T. (2012). The limits of the self: Immunology and biological identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pradeu, T. (2016). The many faces of biological individuality. Biology and Philosophy, 31, 761-773.
Pradeu, T. (2020). Philosophy of biology: immunology and individuality. eLife, 8, e47384.
Smith, S. (2017). Organisms as persisters. Philosophy, Theory and Practice in Biology, 9, 14.
Stappenbeck, T.S., Hooper, L.V., et al. (2002). Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells. PNAS, 99, 15451-15455.
Suárez, J. (2019). The Hologenome Concept of Evolution: A Philosophical and Biological Study. PhD Dissertation. University of Exeter.
Suárez, J. (2020). The stability of traits conception of the hologenome: An evolutionary account of holobiont individuality. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 42, 11.
Suárez, J. (2021). El Holobionte/Hologenoma Como Nivel de Selección: Una Aproximación a La Evolución de Los Consorcios de Múltiples Especies. Theoria, 36(1), 81-112.
Suárez, J., Stencel, A. (2020). A part-dependent account of biological individuality: Why holobionts are individuals and ecosystems simultaneously. Biological Reviews, 95(5), 1308-1324.
Suárez, J., Triviño, V. (2020). What Is a Hologenomic Adaptation? Emergent Individuality and Inter-Identity in Multispecies Systems. Front. Psychol., 11, 187.
Triviño, V., Suárez, J. (2020). Holobionts: ecological communities, hybrids, or biological individuals? A metaphysical perspective on multispecies systems. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 84, 101323.
Suárez, J. (2023). Una ontología parte-dependiente de la individualidad biológica para los consorcios de múltiples especies. ArtefaCToS. Revista De Estudios Sobre La Ciencia Y La tecnología, 12(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.14201/art20231215578
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
+
−