Plato, Carneades and the Academy. A case Study on Scientific Knowledge in Context
Abstract The aim of the present paper is to study the case of Carneades’ epistemological stance as paradigmatic of a conception and a way of what could be called “making science” in the platonic Academy. To do that we will try to show that, although there is no unified theory of knowledge that runs along the history of the school founded by Plato, we can trace certain community of thought through two distinctive traits: the lack of trust in sensitive cognition and dialectic as the method of investigation par excellence.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Allen, James (2020). Carneades. Obtenido de https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/carneades/
Boeri, Marcelo (2006). Platón. Teeteto. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Boeri, Marcelo (2007) Apariencia y realidad en el pensamiento griego. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
Brittain, Charles (2006). Cicero. On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Eggers Lan, Conrado (1988). Platón. República. Madrid: Gredos.
González, Francisco (1998). Dialectic and Dialogue. Plato’s Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kalligas, Paul (2020). Introduction. En Paul Kalligas, Chloe Balla, Effie Baziotopoulou-Valavani & Vassilis Karasmanis (Eds.), Plato’s Academy. Its Workings and its History (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marcos de Pinotti, Graciela (1995). Platón ante el problema del error. La formulación del Teeteto y la solución del Sofista. Buenos Aires: Fundec.
Martínez Hernández, Marcos (1988). Platón. Banquete. Madrid: Gredos.
Obdrzalek, Suzanne (2006). Living in Doubt: Carneades’ Pithanon Reconsidered. En David Sedley (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (pp. 243-279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olivieri, Francisco (1987). Platón. Menón. Madrid: Gredos.
Tarrant, Harold (2020). The Transition from Polemo and Crates to Arcesilaus. En Paul Kalligas, Chloe Balla, Effie Baziotopoulou-Valavani, Vassilis Karasmanis (Eds.), Plato’s Academy. Its Workings and its History (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vigo, Alejandro (2015). Platón. Fedón. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
Boeri, Marcelo (2006). Platón. Teeteto. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Boeri, Marcelo (2007) Apariencia y realidad en el pensamiento griego. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
Brittain, Charles (2006). Cicero. On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Eggers Lan, Conrado (1988). Platón. República. Madrid: Gredos.
González, Francisco (1998). Dialectic and Dialogue. Plato’s Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kalligas, Paul (2020). Introduction. En Paul Kalligas, Chloe Balla, Effie Baziotopoulou-Valavani & Vassilis Karasmanis (Eds.), Plato’s Academy. Its Workings and its History (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marcos de Pinotti, Graciela (1995). Platón ante el problema del error. La formulación del Teeteto y la solución del Sofista. Buenos Aires: Fundec.
Martínez Hernández, Marcos (1988). Platón. Banquete. Madrid: Gredos.
Obdrzalek, Suzanne (2006). Living in Doubt: Carneades’ Pithanon Reconsidered. En David Sedley (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (pp. 243-279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olivieri, Francisco (1987). Platón. Menón. Madrid: Gredos.
Tarrant, Harold (2020). The Transition from Polemo and Crates to Arcesilaus. En Paul Kalligas, Chloe Balla, Effie Baziotopoulou-Valavani, Vassilis Karasmanis (Eds.), Plato’s Academy. Its Workings and its History (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vigo, Alejandro (2015). Platón. Fedón. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
Fernández Palazzo, A. J. (2022). Plato, Carneades and the Academy. A case Study on Scientific Knowledge in Context. ArtefaCToS. Revista De Estudios Sobre La Ciencia Y La tecnología, 11(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.14201/art20221113950
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
+
−