How to carry out traditional or systematic bibliographic reviews us-ing academic databases
Abstract Introduction and objectives: Academic databases allow bibliographic reviews to be carried out that are free of bias and at the same time have maximum transparency and traceability.Method: We present, through questions and answers, the main keys that connect the use of academic databases with bibliographic, systematic or traditional reviews.Results: In each section, links to related entries are presented where the topics discussed are expanded for those who wish to study them further.At the end a recommended bibliography is presented and the two important works on which we have mainly based this and other previous works on the same subject are highlighted.Conclusions: We have presented, in a question and answer system, the essential elements of the relationship between academic databases and bibliographic reviews. To understand this relationship, we have previously presented the functions of bibliographic reviews and their main products. We have also discussed in some detail the characteristics of the main dichotomy that exists in bibliographic reviews, namely traditional and systematic, with its alternative for Social Sciences and Humanities, which do not always work on interventions or on research results, which are the systematic approaches.In the academic databases section, we have developed a group of questions and answers about their use. Showing the main components of the academic databases, as well as a procedure based on 6 phases, have also been shown.In most of the sections, we have also added links to related resources, consisting of entries published on this same site where some of these sections are developed in extenso.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
American Psychological Association. Chap. 3 Journal Article Reporting Standards. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). 2020.
American Psychological Association. Qualitative Meta-Analysis Article Reporting Standards. 2020.
Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. Aug. 2009.
Bloomberg LD, Volpe M. Literature Review and Theoretical/Conceptual Framework. Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map From Beginning to End. 3r ed. London: Sage Publishing. 2016.
Boland, A, Cherry MG, Dickson R. Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. London: Sage. 2014
Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Chapter 2: Taking a Systematic Approach to Your Literature Review. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage. 2016
Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage. 2016.
Booth, Andrew. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5,74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x
Codina L. Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: procedimientos generales y Framework para ciencias humanas y sociales. 2018. https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/34497
Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S et al. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
Fink A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper: London: Sage. 2014
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematics Reviews. London: Sage. 2012
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009, 26, pp.91–108. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hart Ch. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: Sage, 2008.
Higgins, J.; Thomas, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
Jesson JK, Matheson L, Lacey FM. Doing your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. London: Sage. 2011
Machi LA; McEvoy BT. The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin. 2012
Noyes, Jane; Booth, Andrew; Cargo, Margaret, et al. (2019). Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence. Higgins, J.; Thomas, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
Pan ML. Preparing Literature Reviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Routledge. 2017.
Petticrew M; Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell. 2006.
Popay J et. al. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. 2006.
Ridley D. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. London: Sage. 2012.
American Psychological Association. Qualitative Meta-Analysis Article Reporting Standards. 2020.
Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. Aug. 2009.
Bloomberg LD, Volpe M. Literature Review and Theoretical/Conceptual Framework. Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map From Beginning to End. 3r ed. London: Sage Publishing. 2016.
Boland, A, Cherry MG, Dickson R. Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. London: Sage. 2014
Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Chapter 2: Taking a Systematic Approach to Your Literature Review. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage. 2016
Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage. 2016.
Booth, Andrew. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5,74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x
Codina L. Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: procedimientos generales y Framework para ciencias humanas y sociales. 2018. https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/34497
Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S et al. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
Fink A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper: London: Sage. 2014
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematics Reviews. London: Sage. 2012
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009, 26, pp.91–108. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hart Ch. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: Sage, 2008.
Higgins, J.; Thomas, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
Jesson JK, Matheson L, Lacey FM. Doing your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. London: Sage. 2011
Machi LA; McEvoy BT. The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin. 2012
Noyes, Jane; Booth, Andrew; Cargo, Margaret, et al. (2019). Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence. Higgins, J.; Thomas, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
Pan ML. Preparing Literature Reviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Routledge. 2017.
Petticrew M; Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell. 2006.
Popay J et. al. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. 2006.
Ridley D. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. London: Sage. 2012.
Codina, L. (2020). How to carry out traditional or systematic bibliographic reviews us-ing academic databases. Revista ORL, 11(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.22977
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Lluis Codina, Scientific articles: who can sign them and in what order. Ethics and pragmatism of the academic publication , Revista ORL: Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019)
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
+
−