Revista ORL

Make a submission

Annotations to structure a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.22882

Abstract

Introduction and objective: The review article offers the researcher and the reader clarifying information on a specific topic. The systematic bibliographic review must be specified in such a way that it must be reproducible by any researcher. Objective: to guide the authors of a systematic review research work with or without meta-analysis, in some practical organizational aspects. Method: Narrative review. Results and discussion: Seven steps are reviewed to organize the review work: 1- Prepare the computer resources, 2- design the PICO question, 3- choose the variables to be studied, 4- design and do the bibliographic search, 5 - initially select the articles, 6-final selection of articles and 7- write the research report. 
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
1 Introducción al desarrollo de una revisión Cochrane - YouTube [Internet]. Introducción al desarrollo de una revisión Cochrane. 2017 [citado 12 de abril de 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6E6RgDhb3g

Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano traductores. Manual Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas de Intervenciones, versión 5.1.0 [actualizada en marzo de 2011] [Internet]. Barcelona; 2012 [citado 15 de diciembre de 2018]. 639 p. Disponible en: http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269

GRADEpro [Internet]. [citado 13 de abril de 2020]. Disponible en: https://gradepro.org/

Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better? Vol. 7, Military Medical Research. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2020.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Altman D, Antes G, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Vol. 6, PLoS Medicine. 2009.

Pardal-Refoyo JL, Ochoa-Sangrador C. Revisiones sistemáticas. Rev ORL [Internet]. 1 de diciembre de 2017 [citado 12 de abril de 2020];8(4):197-203. Disponible en: http://revistas.usal.es/cinco/index.php/2444-7986/article/view/orl.17082

Recursos para autores - Elaborar revisiones | Cochrane Iberoamérica [Internet]. [citado 12 de abril de 2020]. Disponible en: https://es.cochrane.org/es/recursos-para-autores-elaborar-revisiones

RevMan | Cochrane Training [Internet]. [citado 13 de abril de 2020]. Disponible en: https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman

Sanabria AJ, Rigau D, Rotaeche R, Selva A, Marzo-Castillejo M, Alonso-Coello P. Sistema GRADE: metodología para la realización de recomendaciones para la práctica clínica. Atención Primaria [Internet]. enero de 2015 [citado 20 de agosto de 2017];47(1):48-55. Disponible en: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0212656714000493

Schünemann H, Bro?ek J, Guyatt G OA. MANUAL GRADE. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Versión en Español 2017 [Orrego, PA Rojas, MX (Trans.)]. 2013; Disponible en: http://gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/translations/es/handbook.html

Schünemann H, Bro?ek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. GRADE Handbook. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. [Internet]. 2013. Disponible en: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

Search | Cochrane Training [Internet]. [citado 12 de abril de 2020]. Disponible en: https://training.cochrane.org/search/site?f%5B0%5D=bundle%3Aresource&f%5B1%5D=ss_language%3Aes

Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JSWW, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: A systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 1 de febrero de 2015;8(1):2-10.
Pardal-Refoyo, J. L., & Pardal-Peláez, B. (2020). Annotations to structure a systematic review. Revista ORL, 11(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.22882

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
+ −