Review of the treatment of linguistic sequelae in patients undergo-ing surgery with intraoperative language mapping
Abstract Introduction and Objectives: The approach of speech therapy in patients with tumors of the central nervous system intervened by intraoperative language mapping technique begins in the postsurgical phase in an early manner, rehabilitating the possible linguistic outcomes. The speech therapist bases his intervention based on the information collected in the clinical history and in the assessments made by phoniatrics in each phase. In addition, it considers the different therapeutic approaches, the objectives and intervention strategies to propose the most adapted treatment to the needs of the patient. Patients operated by intraoperative mapping technique present few linguistic deficits compared to those operated by traditional techniques. The most frequent outcomes affect production presenting varied pictures of anomie with semantic, phonological and phonetic paraphasias, perseverations, slowness and speech blocks. The usual treatment of these patients is presented following the pragmatic and cognitive-neurolinguistic approach. Method: Narrative Review. Results: The treatment is personalized and of shorter duration. Conclusions: It is important to know this technique in depth and to theoretically base the intervention in order to approach the patient with better results.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Acevedo Pérez, JL, Sánchez-López A, Nú-ez-Nú-ez C. Logopedia en paciente con mapeo cortical intraoperatorio. Rev. Logop Fon Audiol. 2017;37(1):1-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2016.05.001
Ardila A. Las Afasias. Guadalajara: La Pandora; 2006. Recurso electrónico disponible en https://aalfredoardila.wordpress.com/articles-papers/. [Citado el 11/11/2018].
Benedet MJ. Acercamiento neurolingüístico a las alteraciones del lenguaje. Vol., I y II. Madrid: Eos; 2006.
Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with Stroke-Induced aphasia. JSLHR. 2008;51(5):1282-99.
https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0206)
Coronas Puig-Pallarols M, Basil Almirall C. Comunicación aumentativa y alternativa para personas con afasia. Rev. Logop Fon Audiol. 2013;33:126135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2012.10.004
Cuetos F. Neurociencia del Lenguaje: Bases neurológicas e implicaciones clínicas. Madrid: Panamericana; 2012.
Duffau H. Brain Mapping. From Neural Basis of Cognition to Surgical Applications. Austria: SpringerWienNewYork; 2011.
Helm-Estabrooks N, Albert ML. Manual de la afasia y de terapia de la afasia. 2º ed. Madrid: Panamericana; 2005.
PMid:16006338 PMCid:PMC1307171
Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. 3ªed, Australia: Elsevier; 2008.
Ilmberger J, Ruge M, Kreth, F, Briegel J, Reulen H, Tonn JC. Intraoperative mapping of language functions: a longitudinal neurolinguistic analysis. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:583-92.
https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0583
PMid:18826344
Mazaux JM, Delair MF. Rehabilitación cognitiva y del lenguaje en adultos. EMC – Tratado de medicina. 2014;18,3:1-5.
Moreno Rosset C. Evaluación Psicológica. Teoría y Prácticas. 2ºed. Madrid: Sanz y Torres; 2005.
Peña-Casanova J. Manual de logopedia.4ªEd, Barcelona: Masson; 2014.
Portellano JA. Introducción a la Neuropsicología. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
Robert, E. Linguistic procedure in 'awake neurosurgery'. Stem-Spraak en Taalpathologie. 2005;13:56-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2016.05.001
Ardila A. Las Afasias. Guadalajara: La Pandora; 2006. Recurso electrónico disponible en https://aalfredoardila.wordpress.com/articles-papers/. [Citado el 11/11/2018].
Benedet MJ. Acercamiento neurolingüístico a las alteraciones del lenguaje. Vol., I y II. Madrid: Eos; 2006.
Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with Stroke-Induced aphasia. JSLHR. 2008;51(5):1282-99.
https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0206)
Coronas Puig-Pallarols M, Basil Almirall C. Comunicación aumentativa y alternativa para personas con afasia. Rev. Logop Fon Audiol. 2013;33:126135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2012.10.004
Cuetos F. Neurociencia del Lenguaje: Bases neurológicas e implicaciones clínicas. Madrid: Panamericana; 2012.
Duffau H. Brain Mapping. From Neural Basis of Cognition to Surgical Applications. Austria: SpringerWienNewYork; 2011.
Helm-Estabrooks N, Albert ML. Manual de la afasia y de terapia de la afasia. 2º ed. Madrid: Panamericana; 2005.
PMid:16006338 PMCid:PMC1307171
Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. 3ªed, Australia: Elsevier; 2008.
Ilmberger J, Ruge M, Kreth, F, Briegel J, Reulen H, Tonn JC. Intraoperative mapping of language functions: a longitudinal neurolinguistic analysis. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:583-92.
https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0583
PMid:18826344
Mazaux JM, Delair MF. Rehabilitación cognitiva y del lenguaje en adultos. EMC – Tratado de medicina. 2014;18,3:1-5.
Moreno Rosset C. Evaluación Psicológica. Teoría y Prácticas. 2ºed. Madrid: Sanz y Torres; 2005.
Peña-Casanova J. Manual de logopedia.4ªEd, Barcelona: Masson; 2014.
Portellano JA. Introducción a la Neuropsicología. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
Robert, E. Linguistic procedure in 'awake neurosurgery'. Stem-Spraak en Taalpathologie. 2005;13:56-66.
Acevedo-Pérez, J. L. (2018). Review of the treatment of linguistic sequelae in patients undergo-ing surgery with intraoperative language mapping. Revista ORL, 10(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.14201/orl.19433
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
+
−