El problema de la irreversibilidad: una relación interteórica de dos niveles

Olimpia LOMBARDI, Juan Camilo MARTÍNEZ GONZÁLEZ

Resumen


El objetivo del presente trabajo consiste en arrojar nueva luz sobre el problema de la irreversibilidad, señalando que en las discusiones sobre el tema no se ha tomado en cuenta suficientemente que la relación entre termodinámica y mecánica involucra relaciones teóricas en dos niveles: un nivel intra-teórico y un nivel inter-teórico. Intentaremos poner de manifiesto los dos pasos necesarios para establecer el vínculo entre irreversibilidad termodinámica y reversibilidad mecánica: el primer paso consiste en explicar la relación intra-teórica entre macro-irreversibilidad y micro-reversibilidad en el marco mecánico; el segundo paso es establecer la relación inter-teórica entre la irreversibilidad termodinámica expresada por el segundo principio y la macro-irreversibilidad obtenida en el primer paso. Finalmente, se discutirán las posibles interpretaciones de estos dos pasos desde diferentes posturas filosóficas.


Palabras clave


Emergencia; reducción; pluralismo; termodinámica; mecánica estadística; relaciones interteóricas.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Anderson, Philip (1972). More is Different. Science, 177, 393-396.

Batterman, Robert (2002). The Devil in the Details. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bricmont, Jean (1995). Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science. Physicalia, 17, 159-208.

Butterfield, Jeremy (2011a). Emergence, Reduction and Supervenience: A Varied Landscape. Foundations of Physics, 41, 920-959.

Butterfield, Jeremy (2011b). Less is Emergence and Reduction Reconciled. Foundations of Physics, 41, 1065-1135.

Davidson, Donald. (1970). Mental Events. En L. Foster y J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and Theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.

Dizadji-Bahmani, Foad, Frigg, Roman y Hartmann, Stephan (2010). Who is afraid of Nagelian reduction? Erkenntnis, 73, 393-412.

Dizadji-Bahmani, Foad, Frigg, Roman y Hartmann, Stephan (2011). Confirmation and reduction: A Bayesian account. Synthese, 179, 321-338.

El-Hani, Charbel y Pihlström, Sami. (2002). Emergence theories and pragmatic realism. Essays in Philosophy, 3(2), Art. 3.

Esfeld, Michael y Sachse, Christian (2007). Theory reduction by means of functional sub-types. International Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences, 21, 1-17.

Fazekas, Peter (2009). Reconsidering the role of bridge laws in inter-theoretic reductions. Erkenntnis, 71, 303-322.

Fodor, Jerry (1974). Special sciences (or: The disunity of sciences as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97-115.

Fodor, Jerry (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Frigg, Roman (2007). A field guide to recent work on the foundations of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. En D. Rickles (ed.), The Ashgate Companion to the New Philosophy of Physics (pp. 99-196). London: Ashgate.

Gibbs, Josiah Willard (1902) [1960]. Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics. New York: Dover.

Howard, Don (2007). Reduction and emergence in the physical sciences: some lessons from the particle physics and condensed matter debate. en N. Murphy y W. R. Stoeger (eds.), Evolution and Emergence: Systems, Organisms, Persons (pp. 141-157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hull, David (1972). Reductionism in genetics: biology or philosophy? Philosophy of Science, 39, 491-499.

Humphreys, Paul (1997). How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science, 64, 1-17.

Humphreys, Paul (2008). Synchronic and diachronic emergence. Minds & Machines, 18, 431-442.

Kim, Jaegwon (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3-36.

Kim, Jaegwon (2008). Reduction and Reductive Explanation. Is One Possible Without the Other? En J. Kallestrup y J. Hohwy (Eds.), Being Reduced. New Essays on Reduction, Explanation and Causation (pp. 93-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitcher, Philip (1984). 1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences. Philosophical Review, 93, 335-373.

Klein, Colin (2009). Reduction Without Reductionism: A Defence of Nagel on Connectability. Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 39-53.

Lebowitz, Joel (1993). Boltzmann's Time's Arrow. Physics Today, 46, 9-32.

Lebowitz, Joel y Penrose, Oliver (1973). Modern Theory. Physics Today, 26, 23-29.

Lewis, David (1994). Reduction of Mind. En D. Lewis (ed.), Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology (pp. 291-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lombardi, Olimpia (2003). El problema de la ergodicidad en mecánica estadística. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 35, 3-41.

Lombardi, Olimpia (2011). The Problem of Irreversibility, From Fourier to Chaos Theory: The tTajectory of a Controversy Space. En O. Nudler (ed.), Controversy Spaces. A model of scientific and philosophical change (pp. 77-102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lombardi, Olimpia (2014a). Linking Chemistry with Physics: Arguments and Counterarguments. Foundations of Chemistry, 16, 181-192.

Lombardi, Olimpia (2014b). The Ontological Autonomy of the Chemical World: Facing the Criticisms. En E. Scerri y L. McIntyre (eds.), Philosophy of Chemistry: Growth of a New Discipline (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science) (pp. 23-38). Dordrecht: Springer.

Lombardi, O. y Labarca, Martín (2005). The Ontological Autonomy of the Chemical World. Foundations of Chemistry, 7, 125-148.

Lombardi, Olimpia y Labarca, Martín (2006). The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Needha. Foundations of Chemistry, 8, 81-92.

Lombardi, Olimpia y Labarca, Martín (2011). On the autonomous existence of chemical entities. Current Physical Chemistry, 1, 69-75.

Lombardi, Olimpia y Pérez Ransanz, Ana Rosa (2012). Los Múltiples Mundos de la Ciencia. Un Realismo Pluralista y su Aplicación a la Filosofía de la Física. México: UNAM-Siglo XXI.

McLaughlin, Brian (1997). Emergence and supervenience. Intellectica, 2, 25-43.

Nagel, Ernst (1949). The meaning of reduction in the natural sciences. En R. C. Stauffer (Ed.), Science and Civilization (pp. 99-135). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Nagel, Ernst (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Needham, Paul (2010). Nagel's analysis of reduction: Comments in defense as well as critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 163-170.

Neurath, Otto (1935) [1983]. The unity of science as a task. En M. Neurath y R. S. Cohen (eds.), Otto Neurath. Philosophical Papers 1913-1946 (pp. 115-120). Dordrecht: Reidel.

Nickles, Thomas (1973). Two concepts of intertheoretic reduction. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 181-201.

O'Connor, Timothy. y Wong, Hong Yu (2015). Emergent Properties. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.),

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition). Obtenido de http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/

Prigogine, Ilya y Stengers, Isabelle (1984). Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books.

Primas, Hans (1981). Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer.

Primas, Hans (1998). Emergence in Exact Natural Sciences. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, 91, 83-98.

Putnam, Hilary (1975). Philosophy and Our Mental Life. Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers (pp. 291-303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, Hilary (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, Hilary (1990). Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Rohrlich, Fritz (1988). Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 295-312.

Rueger, Alexander (2000). Physical Emergence, Diachronic and Synchronic. Synthese, 124, 297-322.

Schaffner, Kenneth (1993). Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Schaffner, Kenneth (2013). Ernest Nagel and reduction. Journal of Philosophy, 109, 534-565.

Scerri, Eric y McIntyre, Lee (1997). The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry. Synthese, 111, 213-232.

Silberstein, Michael y McGeever, John (1999). The search for ontological emergence. Philosophical Quarterly, 49,182-200.

Sklar, Lawrence (1967). Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction. British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5, 464-482.

Sklar, Lawrence (1993). Physics and Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tolman, Richard (1938). The Principles of Statistical Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Torretti, Roberto (2000). Scientific Realism and Scientific Practice. En E. Agazzi y M. Pauri (eds.), The Reality of the Unobservable: Observability, Unobservability and their Impact on the Issue of Scientific Realism (pp. 113-122). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Torretti, Roberto (2008). Objectivity: A Kantian Perspective. En M. Massimi (ed.), Kant and Philosophy of Science Today (pp. 81-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Uffink, Jos (2007). Compendium of the Foundations of Classical Statistical Physics. En J. Butterfield y J. Earman (eds.), Philosophy of Physics (pp. 923-1074). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

van Riel, Raphael (2011). Nagelian reduction beyond the Nagel model. Philosophy of Science, 78, 353-375.

Wimsatt, William (1976). Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account. En R. S. Cohen, C. A. Hooker y A. C. Michalos (Eds.), PSA 1974: Proceedings of the 1974 Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 671-710). Dordrecht: Reidel.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/artefactos2018712950





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.