El Futuro del Pasado

Allison, G. T. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. [s.l.] Little, Brown, 1971.
Barros, P. S. O governo Chávez e desenvolvimento: a política em processo. São Paulo: PUC-SP, 18 maio 2007.
Barros, P. S.; Pinto, L. F. S. A Presença dos Países do BRICS na Venezuela. Boletim de Economia e Política Internacional (BEPI), v. 9, p. 101–115, mar. 2012.
Bbc News. Russian navy sails to Venezuela. Disponível em: <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7628899.stm>. Acesso em: 7 abr. 2019.
___. Spat over Russian bombers in Venezuela. 11 dez. 2018.
Camilleri, M. J. Evolution or Revolution? U.S. Policy on Venezuela from Obama to Trump. Pensamiento Própio, n. 47, p. 18, 2018.
Cerón, A. I. C.; Wiesner, M. L. R. Panorama de la migración internacional en México y Centroamérica. Población y Desarollo. p. 93, 2018.
China. China’s Policy Paper on Latin America and the CaribbeanChinese Government, , 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.gov.cn/english/official/2008-11/05/content_1140347.htm>. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2019
___. China’s Military Strategy 2015Chinese Government, , 2015.
Conceição-Heldt, E. Da; Mello, P. A. Two-Level Games in Foreign Policy Analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 28 jun. 2017.
Corrales, J.; Romero, C. A. U.S.-Venezuelan Relations after Hugo Chávez. In: Contemporary U.S.-Latin American Relations: Cooperation Or Conflict in the 21st Century? [s.l.] Routledge, 2016. p. 213–235.
Corrales, J.; Romero, C. A.; Romero, C. A. U.S.-Venezuela Relations since the 1990s : Coping with Midlevel Security Threats. [s.l.] Routledge, 2012.
Dyner, A. M.; Rodkiewickz, W. The Russian Federation’s New Foreign Policy Concept and Threatening a Pivot towards Asia: A new foreign policy concept of the russian federationCenter for Security Studies ETJ zurich, 11 jan. 2017. Disponível em: <http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/7f574d71-2f0e-4eb8-a865-8baea6f8a020/pdf>. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2019
Eaton, C. OPEC sends fewest oil cargoes to United States in at least five years. Reuters, 3 jan. 2019.
Ellis, E. China on the Ground in Latin America: Challenges for the Chinese and Impacts on the Region. [s.l.] Springer, 2014.
____. The New Russian Engagement with Latin America: Strategic Position, Commerce, and Dreams of the Past. p. 137, 2015.
____. China-Latin America Military Engagement: Good Will, Good Business and Strategic Position. [s.l.] Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2011. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep11283>. Acesso em: 4 mar. 2019.
____. China’s Growing Relationship with Latin America and the Caribbean. Air & Space Power Journal, p. 3–17, 2015.
Goldwyn, D. L.; Gill, C. R. The waning of Petrocaribe? Central America and Caribbean energy in transition. [s.l.] Atlantic Council, 3 maio 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/the-waning-of-petrocaribe-central-america-and-caribbean-energy-in-transition/>. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2019.
Halperin, M. H.; Clapp, P. A.; Kanter, A. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. 2. ed. [s.l.] Brookings Institution Press, 2006.
Heath, T. R.; Gunness, K.; Cooper, C. A. I. The PLA and China’s Rejuvenation. Product Page. Disponível em: <https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1402.html>. Acesso em: 5 abr. 2019.
IMF. World Economic Outlook, April 2019: Growth Slowdown, Precarious Recovery. [s.l.] International Monetary Fund - IMF, abr. 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/03/28/world-economic-outlook-april-2019>. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2019.
Jones, C. M. Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Process Models. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, 1 mar. 2010.
Kaplan, S. B.; Penfold, M. China-Venezuela Economic Relations: Hedging Venezuelan Bets with Chinese Characteristics. [s.l.] Wilson Center. Latin American Program. Kissinger Institute on China and the United States, Fev 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/china-venezuela-economic-relations-hedging-venezuelan-bets-chinese-characteristics>. Acesso em: 4 mar. 2019.
Koleski, K.; Blivas, A. China’s Engagement with Latin America and the Caribbean. U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission, p. 65, 17 out. 2018.
Lima, R. C. Strategic communications as a tool for great power politics in Venezuela. Defence Strategic Communications, v. 6, n. 6, p. 89–122, 2019.
Lobell, S. E.; Ripsman, N. M.; Taliaferro, J. W. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Mclean, B. How America’s “most reckless” billionaire created the fracking boom. The Guardian, 30 ago. 2018.
Mearsheimer, J. J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (Updated Edition). [s.l.] W. W. Norton & Company, 2003.
Mijares, V. M. Soft Balancing the Titans: Venezuelan Foreign-Policy Strategy Toward the United States, China, and Russia. Latin American Policy, v. 8, n. 2, p. 201–231, 2017.
Myers, M.; Gallagher, K. Cautious Capital: Chinese Development Finance in LAC, 2018. [s.l.] The Dialogue, Fev 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.thedialogue.org/analysis/cautious-capital-chinese-development-finance-in-lac-2018/>. Acesso em: 9 mar. 2019.
Nexon, D. H. The Balance of Power in the Balance. World Politics, v. 61, n. 2, p. 330–359, abr. 2009.
OHCHR. Human rights in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of Human rights in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. [s.l: s.n.]. . Acesso em: 10 jul. 2019.
Paul, T. V. Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance. In: Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. [s.l.] Stanford University Press, 2004. p. 1–25.
Pedroso, C. S. [UNESP. Entre o bolivarianismo e a adesão à hegemonia: a relação de Venezuela e Estados Unidos durante o chavismo (1999-2013). 3 ago. 2018.
Putnam, R. D. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, v. 42, n. 3, p. 427–460, ed 1988.
Ripsman, N. M. Neoclassical Realism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, 13 jun. 2011.
Ripsman, N. M.; Taliaferro, J. W.; Lobell, S. E. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 2016.
Rose, G. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, v. 51, n. 1, p. 144–172, 1998.
Rouvinski, V. Russian-Venezuelan Relations at a Crossroads. [s.l.] Wilson Center. Kennan Institute., 2019a.
___. Venezuela: A Dead End for Russia? Disponível em: <https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/01/25/venezuela-a-dead-end-for-russia-op-ed-a64288>. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2019b.
Russia says it sent “specialists” to Venezuela, rebuffs Trump. Reuters, 28 mar. 2019.
Schweller, R. L. Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security, v. 29, n. 2, p. 159–201, 2004.
Seelke, C. R. Et Al. Venezuela: Background and U.S. Relations. p. 53, 21 jan. 2019.
Serbin, A.; Pont, A. S. The Foreign Policy of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela: The Role and Legacy of Hugo Chávez. Latin American Policy, v. 8, n. 2, p. 232–248, 2017.
Stanley, A. Mapping the U.S.-Canada Energy Relationship. Washington: CSIS, maio 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.csis.org/analysis/mapping-us-canada-energy-relationship>. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2019.
Stuenkel, O. Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers Are Remaking Global Order. [s.l.] John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
Sushentsov, A. The Russian Response to the RMA: Military Strategy towards Modern Security Threats. In: Reassessing the Revolution in Military Affairs: Transformation, Evolution and Lessons Learnt. [s.l.] Springer, 2015. .
Taliaferro, J. W. State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State. Security Studies, v. 15, n. 3, p. 464–495, 1 set. 2006.
Teixeira Júnior, A. W. M. Postura Estratégica da Rússia e Uso da Força no Século XXI. Centro de Estudos Estratégicos do Exército : Análise Estratégica, v. 10, n. 4, p. 5–20, 14 nov. 2018.
The Russian Federation. Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian FederationThe Russian Federation, , 18 fev. 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/122186>. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2019
___. Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian FederationThe Russian Federation, , 30 nov. 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248>. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2019
U.S. National Security Strategy of the United States of AmericaThe White House, , fev. 2015. Disponível em: <https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 maio. 2019
___. National Security Strategy of the United States of AmericaThe White House, , dez. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 maio. 2019
U.S. Energy Information Administration. Canada - International - Analysis -. Disponível em: <https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.php?iso=CAN>. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2019.
Walt, S. M. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, v. 9, n. 4, p. 3–43, 1985.
___. Alliances in a Unipolar World. World Politics, v. 61, n. 1, p. 86–120, 2009.
Waltz, K. N. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, v. 25, n. 1, p. 5–41, 1 jul. 2000.
___. Theory of International Politics. [s.l.] Waveland Press, 2010.
Xu, Y. China’s Strategic Partnerships in Latin America: Case Studies of China’s Oil Diplomacy in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela, 1991–2015. [s.l.] Lexington Books, 2016.
Zakaria, F. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. [s.l.] Princeton University Press, 1999.
Zhang, F. Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History. [s.l.] Stanford University Press, 2015.
Zhong, L.; Zhang, J. Political Myth as Strategic Communication: Analysis of Chinese Dream’s Rhetoric and English News Media’s Interpretation. International Journal of Strategic Communication, v. 10, n. 1, p. 51–68, 1 jan. 2016.