The so-called «Itinerario de Barro». Questions of authenticity and interpretation

  • Carmen Fernández Ochoa
    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid carmen.fernandez[at]uam.es
  • Ángel Morillo Cerdán
    Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Fernando Gil Sendino
    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Abstract

The authenticity of the so-called Itinerario de Barro has been proven thanks to the use of the thermoluminescence technique on the four fired clay tablets. Controversy around Itinerario de Barro has existed since it was first published almost one century ago, and the verification of its authenticity has been the basis to offer an outline of the identification hypothesis of mansiones. This source is reinterpreted here in the framework of the road network in Northern and Western Spain, and the problems that are still rela- ted thereto are mentioned.
  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Fernández Ochoa, C., Morillo Cerdán, Ángel, & Gil Sendino, F. (2013). The so-called «Itinerario de Barro». Questions of authenticity and interpretation. Zephyrvs, 70, 151–179. Retrieved from https://revistas.usal.es/uno/index.php/0514-7336/article/view/9332

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carmen Fernández Ochoa

,
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Dpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología. Avda. Tomás y Valiente, 1. Campus de Cantoblanco, UAM  28049 Madrid (España)

Ángel Morillo Cerdán

,
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Dpto. de Ciencias y Técnicas Historiográficas y Arqueología. Universidad Complutense. C/ Profesor Aranguren, s/n. 28040 Madrid. Correo-e:

Fernando Gil Sendino

,
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Dpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología. Avda. Tomás y Valiente, 1. Campus de Cantoblanco, UAM  28049 Madrid (España)
+