Especialistas en el ejército romano. La función militar de los frumentarii durante el Principado
Resumen
Este artículo ofrece una perspectiva poco explorada sobre las funciones y evolución de un cuerpo especial perteneciente al ejército romano, los frumentarii. Asociados a la categoría de principales, al abastecimiento y distribución de suministros, y especialmente de grano, como su nombre parece indicar, fueron prontamente encargados de una gran cantidad de actividades adicionales. Misiones para transportar materiales de lujo a Roma, «espionaje», vigilancia, servicio de policía, asesinatos, recogida de tributos y supervisión de la defensa en las provincias fueron algunos de los dispares, aunque esenciales, cometidos que la tropa llevó a cabo hasta finales del siglo III. Aunque al parecer su pésima reputación propició la disolución del cuerpo, durante muchos años fueron los ojos y oídos de los emperadores. Intentaremos explicar su desarrollo e importancia en la sociedad romana, haciendo hincapié en la pervivencia de sus habilidades militares.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high‐technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(2), 115-129.
Berch, R. (2013). Introduçao aTecnologia Assitiva (Introduction to Assistive Technology). Porto Alegre: RS; Portuguese
Bosshard, R. G., & Yeo, J. D. (1983). Low cost wheelchair. Spinal Cord, 21(2), 94.
Buehler, E., Comrie, N., Hofmann, M., McDonald, S., & Hurst, A. (2016). Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2870640
Buehler, E., Hurst, A., & Hofmann, M. (2014). Coming to grips. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility - ASSETS ’14 (pp. 291–292). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661345
Colver, A. (2006). Study protocol : SPARCLE – a multi-centre European study of the relationship of environment to participation and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy, 10, 1–10. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-105
Cook, A. & Hussey, S. (2002). Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby
Cumming, R.G., Thomas, M., Szonyi, G., Frampton, G., Salked, G, & Clemson, L.(2001). Adherence to occupational therapist recommendations for home modifications for falss prevention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 641-648.
Cury, V. C., Figueiredo, P. R., & Mancini, M. C. (2013). Environmental settings and families' socioeconomic status influence mobility and the use of mobility devices by children with cerebral palsy. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 71(2), 100-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2013005000003
Chae, M. P., Rozen, W. M., McMenamin, P. G., Findlay, M. W., Spychal, R. T., & Hunter-Smith, D. J. (2015). Emerging Applications of Bedside 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery, 2, 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00025
de Sousa Leite, E., Rodrigues, T. P., Moreira, M. A. S. P., Bittencourt, G. K. G. D., de Oliveira, F. B., Simpson, C. A., & Silva, A. O. (2016). Influence of assistive technology for the maintenance of the functionality of elderly people: an integrative review. International Archives of Medicine, 9.
Dahlin, E., & Rydén, M. (2011). Assistive technology for persons with psychiatric disabilities: accessibility and cost-benefit. Assistive Technology Research Series, 29, 294-299.
Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS. Canadian Journal Rehabilitation, 9, 159-168.
Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 101-105.
Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J. W. (2004). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 17(3-4), 63-79.
Freedman, V. A., Martin, L. G., & Schoeni, R. F. (2002). Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. Jama, 288(24), 3137-3146.
González, M. Y., Moltó, A., y Ovejero, M. M. (2017). Envejecimiento en parálisis cerebral, un reto en investigación e innovación: Revisión sistemática. Universitas Psychologica, 16(3), 1-15. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana .upsy16-3.epcr
Gosman-Hedström, G., Claesson, L., Blomstrand, C., Fagerberg, B., & Lundgren-Lindquist, B. (2002). Use and cost of assistive technology the first year after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 18(3), 520-527.
Guíñez, L. B., & Concha, L. S. (2005). Intervención de terapia ocupacional en síndrome de inmovilización instaurado. Revista Chilena de Terapia Ocupacional, (5), Pág-13.
Hohmann, P., & Cassapian, M. R. (2011). Adaptações de baixo custo: uma revisão de literatura da utilização por terapeutas ocupacionais brasileiros. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 22(1), 10-18.
Jiménez, E. & Díez, E. (2016). Impacto psicosocial de los productos y tecnologías de apoyo para la comunicación en personas con discapacidad auditiva y personas sordas. Recuperado de: http://sid.usal.es/idocs/F8/FDO27380/JimenezArberas.pdf
Jinks, A., & Sinteff, B. (1994). Consumer response to AAC devices: Acquisition, training, use, and satisfaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10(3), 184-190.
Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 85-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434610500483588
Jutai, J. (1999). Quality of life impact of assistive technology. Rehabilitation Engineering, 14, 2-7.
Jutai, J., Rigby, P., Ryan, S., & Stickel, S. (2000). Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assistive Technology, 12(2), 123-131.
Lauer, A., Longenecker R. K., & Smith, R. O. (2006, August 18). ATOMS Project Technical Report—Factors in Assistive Technology Device Abandonment: Replacing “Abandonment” with “Discontinuance.” Retrieved from http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-discontinuance.html
Lenker, J.A., & Paquet, V.L. (2003). A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 15(1), 1-15.
Longo, E., & Badia, M. (2009). La participación en las actividades de ocio de los niños y adolescentes con parálisis cerebral. Siglo Cero. Revista Española de Discapacidad Intelectual, 40(4), 79–93.
Long, A., Southall, K., Fowler, S., Cotterill, N., Van Den Heuvel, E., & Jutai, J. W. (2014). Towards the development of the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale for continence (C-PIADS). Technology and Disability, 26(2, 3), 153-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140413
Martin, J. K., Martin, L. G., Stumbo, N. J., & Morrill, J. H. (2011). The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(3), 225-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100802338440
Marvin, L. A., Montano, J. J., Fusco, L. M., & Gould, E. P. (2003). Speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of their training and experience in using alternative and augmentative communication. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 30, 76-83.
Norma UNE- EN ISO 9999/2018).V2 Productos de apoyo para personas con discapacidad. Clasificación y terminología. (ISO 9999:2011)
Nielsen, J., & Phillips, V. L. (1993, May). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. In Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 214-221). ACM
Østensjø, S., Carlberg, E. B., & Vøllestad, N. K. (2005). The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(14), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400018619
Pape, T. L., Kim, J., & Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disability and rehabilitation, 24(1-3), 5-20.
Parkes, J., McCullough, N., y Madden, A. (2010). To what extent do children with cerebral palsy participate in everyday life situations? Health and Social Care in the Community, 18(3), 304–315. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00908.x
Paterson, A. M., Donnison, E., Bibb, R. J., & Ian Campbell, R. (2014). Computer-aided design to support fabrication of wrist splints using 3D printing: A feasibility study. Hand Therapy, 19(4), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998314544802
Pearlman, J., Cooper, R., Chhabra, H. S., & Jefferds, A. (2009). Design, development and testing of a low-cost electric powered wheelchair for India. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(1), 42-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100802338440
Philips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5, 36-45.
Pousada, T. (2011). Impacto psicosocial de la silla de ruedas en la vida de las personas afectadas por una enfermedad neuromuscular.
Portnova, A. A., Mukherjee, G., Peters, K. M., Yamane, A., & Steele, K. M. (2018). Design of a 3D-printed, open-source wrist-driven orthosis for individuals with spinal cord injury. PloS One, 13(2), e0193106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193106
Ratcliff, A., & Beukelman, D. (1995). Preprofessional preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: State-of-the-art report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(2), 61-73.
Raya, R., Rocon, E., Ceres, R., Harlaar, J., & Geytenbeek, J. (2011, June). Characterizing head motor disorders to create novel interfaces for people with cerebral palsy: Creating an alternative communication channel by head motion. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Riemer-Reiss, M.L., Wacker, R.R. (2000) Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44-50.
Pousada, T., Pereira, J., Groba, B., Nieto, L., & Pazos, A. (2014). Assessing mouse alternatives to access to computer: a case study of a user with cerebral palsy. Assistive Technology, 26(1), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2013.792880
Ryan, S. E., Sawatzky, B., Campbell, K. A., Rigby, P. J., Montpetit, K., Roxborough, L., & McKeever, P. D. (2014). Functional outcomes associated with adaptive seating interventions in children and youth with wheeled mobility needs. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 95(5), 825-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.001
Saunders, G. H., Lewis, M. S., & Forsline, A. (2009). Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20(5), 320-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.20.5.6
Scherer, M. J. (1998). Characteristics of a meaningful outcome assessment. RESNA resource guide for assistive technology outcomes: Measurement tools, 1, 50-59.
Scherer, M. J., & Cushman, L. A. (2000). Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries. Psychological reports, 87(3), 981-987.
Schwartz, J. (2017). 3D Printing Customized Assistive Technology: A Feasibility Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(10), e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APMR.2017.08.073
Shore, S., & Juillerat, S. (2012). The impact of a low cost wheelchair on the quality of life of the disabled in the developing world. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 18(9), CR533. http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.883348
Traversoni, S., Jutai, J., Fundarò, C., Salvini, S., Casale, R., & Giardini, A. (2018). Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Quality of Life Research, 27(12), 3217-3227.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6
Yi, S. H., Hwang, J. H., Kim, S. J., & Kwon, J. Y. (2012). Validity of pediatric balance scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Neuropediatrics, 43(06), 307-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327774
van der Dussen, L., Nieuwstraten, W., Roebroeck, M., y Stam, H. J. (2001). Functional level of young adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil, 15(1), 84–91. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11237165
Verza, R., Carvalho, M. L., Battaglia, M. A., & Uccelli, M.(2006) An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Multiple Sclerosis, 12, 88-93.http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1352458506ms1233oa
WATI Development Team. (2017). Assistive Technology Consideration and Assessment Forms
Wielandt, T., & Strong, J. (2000). Compliance with prescribed adaptive equipment: A literature review. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(2),65-75.
World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva.
Zatulovsky, L., Robinson Sr, C. A., Renolds Jr, R. W., Dingley, R., & George, D. S. (1996). U.S. Patent No. 5,560,627. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Zuniga, J., Katsavelis, D., Peck, J., Stollberg, J., Petrykowski, M., Carson, A., & Fernandez, C. (2015). Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3d-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences. BMC Research Notes, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-0971-9