Productividad científica sobre el Blended Learning en el Perú: aproximaciones a su evolución desde las tesis universitarias
Resumen
La significativa presencia de las Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en los escenarios educativos suscita la necesidad de reconocer los efectos generados, fundamentalmente, con la emergencia del Blended Learning desarrollado en Perú. Se demanda, pues, determinar la evolución de la productividad científica sobre las tesis universitarias que la investigan. Para dicho propósito, la revisión sistemática constituyó el método propicio para identificar, evaluar, interpretar y sintetizar sus aspectos significativos. Las tesis han sido recuperadas de RENATI (Repositorio Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación), producidas en los últimos 12 años. Los resultados muestran que las tesis analizadas revelan ciertas prevalencias: de las tesis de posgrado sobre las de grado, de una creciente evolución en el último quinquenio, de desarrollo semejante en universidades públicas y privadas, de una alta centralidad en la capital, y de una raleada distribución a lo largo del país. También se ha evidenciado la priorización de algunos dominios durante la formación, de lo cognitivo sobre lo procedimental y actitudinal, de un trabajo más individualizado que participativo y de un desarrollo similar de contenidos disciplinares y transversales. El estudio expone, igualmente, los logros concretados a partir de los soportes formativos, tanto de carácter tecnológico como del acompañamiento tutorial, mostrando una inevitable convergencia. En conclusión, los hallazgos revelan las distancias y proximidades del Blended Learning de sus equivalentes internacionales.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Baber, Christopher (2003). Cognition and Tool Use: Forms of Engagement in Human and Animal Use of Tools. London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420024203
Baber, Christopher (2006). Cognitive Aspects of Tool Use. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1 SPEC. ISS.), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.004
Badallo, Ana Cuevas (2016). Artefactualidad animal. Ludus Vitalis, 24 (45), 155-174.
Bird, Christopher D. and Nathan John Emery (2009). Report Rooks Use Stones to Raise the Water Level to Reach a Floating Worm. Biology, 19, 1410-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.033
Boesch, Chiristophe and Hedwige Boesch (1990). Tool Use and Tool Making in Wild Chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, 54(1-2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156428
Borgo, Stefano, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Stefano Borgo, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu, Elisabetta Visalberghi Artifact, and Artifact Catego (2013). Artifact and Artifact Categorization: Comparing Humans and Capuchin Monkeys. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 375-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0144-5
Brey, Philip (2005). The Epistemology and Ontology of Human-Computer Interaction. Minds and Machines, 15(3-4), 383-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1
Byrne, Richard W., Crickette M. Sanz, and David B. Morgan (2013). Chimpanzees Plan Their Tool Use. En: C. M. Sanz, J. Call, and C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool Use in Animals: Cognition and Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carruthers, Peter (2006). Invertebrate Minds: A Challenge for Ethical Theory. Journal of Ethics, 11(3), 275-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-007-9015-6
Carruthers, Peter (2009). How We Know Our Own Minds: The Relationship between Mindreading and Metacognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 121-138; discussion 138-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000545
Clark, Andy (2006). Material Symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080600689872
Clark, Andy and David J. Chalmers (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Clartcey, William J. (2009). Scientific Antecedents of Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayton, Nicola S. and Anthony Dickinson (1999). Scrub Jays (Aphelocoma Coerulescens) Remember the Relative Time of Caching as Well as the Location and Content of Their Caches. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(4), 403-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.403
Clayton, Nicola S., Timothy J. Bussey, and Anthony Dickinson (2003). Can Animals Recall the Past and Plan for the Future? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4(8), 685-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1180
Cummins, Robert (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(10), 741-764. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024640
Donald, Merlin (2010). The Exographic Revolution: Neuropsychological Sequaelae. In: Lambros Malafouris & Colin Renfrew (Eds.), The Cognitive Life of Things. Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind (pp. 71-79). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.
Eberhard, William G. (1982). Behavioral Characters for the Higher Classification of Orb-Weaving Spiders. Evolution, 36(5), 1067-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05475.x
Emery, N. J. and Clayton, N. S. (2001). Effects of Experience and Social Context on Prospective Caching Strategies by Scrub Jays. Nature, 414(6862), 443-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/35106560
Fasoli, Marco (2017). Substitutive, Complementary and Constitutive Cognitive Artifacts: Developing an Interaction-Centered Approach. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0363-2
Foote, Allison L. and Jonathon D. Crystal (2007). Metacognition in the Rat. Current Biology, 17(6), 551-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061
Gallistel, Randy (1998). Insect Navigation: Brains as Symbol-Processing Organs. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 4, 1-52.
Goodall, Jane (1964). Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees. Nature, 201 (4926), 1264-1266. https://doi.org/10.1038/2011264a0
Gould, J. L. (1986). The Locale Map of Honeybees: Do Insects Have Cognitive Maps? Science, 232(4752), 861-863. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.232.4752.861
Hampton, Robert (2001). Rhesus Monkeys Know When They Remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(9), 5359-62. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071600998
Hansell, Mike and Graeme D. Ruxton (2008). Setting Tool Use within the Context of Animal Construction Behaviour. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.006
Heersmink, Richard (2012). The Varieties of Situated Cognitive Systems: Embodied Agents, Cognitive Artifacts, and Scientific Practice. Tesis doctoral obtenida de: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Heersmink,+Richard+(2012).+The+Varieties+of+Situated+Cognitive+Systems:+Embodied+Agents,+Cognitive+Artifacts,+and+Scientific+Practice&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Heersmink, Richard (2013). A Taxonomy of Cognitive Artifacts: Function, Information, and Categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 465-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1
Heersmink, Richard (2015). Dimensions of Integration in Embedded and Extended Cognitive Systems. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1
Heersmink, Richard (2016). The Metaphysics of Cognitive Artifacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19, 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2014.910310
Heersmink, Richard (2018). A Virtue Epistemology of the Internet: Search Engines, Intellectual Virtues and Education. Social Epistemology, 32(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1383530
Hollan, J. D. James, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh (2000). Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-96. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
Hunt, G. R. (1996). Manufacture and Use of Hook-Tools by New Caledonian Crows. Nature, 379(6562), 249-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/379249a0
Japyassú, Hilton F. and Kevin N. Laland (2017). Extended Spider Cognition. Animal Cognition, 20(3), 375-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1069-7
Kirsh, David (1995). The Intelligent Use of Space. Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1-2), 31-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
Leakey, Richard (1994). The Origin of the Humankind. New York: Basic Books.
Lomas, Derek (2007). Cognitive Artifacts. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, 289. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1255025
Maglio, Paul and David Kirsh (1992). Some Epistemic Benefits of Action: Tetris, a Case Study. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 14, 224.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. The MIT Press.
Mulcahy, N. J. and J. Call (2006). Apes Save Tools Fur Future Use. Science, 312(2006), 1038-40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125456
Nakata, K. (2010). Attention Focusing in a Sit-and-Wait Forager: A Spider Controls Its Prey-Detection Ability in Different Web Sectors by Adjusting Thread Tension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1678), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1583
Norman, Donald A and Carroll, M. (1991). Cognitive Artifacts. Designing Interaction, Psychology at the human-computer interface, 1, 17-38.
Norman, Donald A. (1992). Design Principles for Cognitive Artifacts. Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032391
Osvath, Mathias (2009). Spontaneous Planning for Future Stone Throwing by a Male Chimpanzee. Current Biology, 19(5), 190-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.010
Osvath, Mathias and Helena Osvath (2008). Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) and Orangutan (Pongo Abelii) Forethought: Self-Control and Pre-Experience in the Face of Future Tool Use. Animal Cognition, 11(4), 661-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0157-0
Parente, Diego y Andrés Crelier (2015). La naturaleza de los artefactos: intenciones y funciones en la cultura material. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Penna-Gonçalves, V., C. R. M. Garcia, and H. F. Japyassú (2008). Homology in a Context Dependent Predatory Behavior in Spiders (Araneae). Journal of Arachnology, 36(2), 352-59. https://doi.org/10.1636/CSt07-118.1
Perdue, Bonnie M., Theodore A. Evans, Michael J. Beran (2018). Chimpanzees Show Some Evidence of Selectively Acquiring Information by Using Tools, Making Inferences, and Evaluating Possible Outcomes. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193229
Preston, Beth (1998a). Why Is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function. Journal of Philosophy, 95(5), 215-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564689
Preston, Beth (1998b). Cognition and tool use. Mind & Language, 13(4), 513-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00090
Preston, Beth (2012). A Philosophy of Material Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069844
Proust, Joëlle (2015). The Representational Structure of Feelings. Open MIND, 31, 1-26.
Robbins, P., Aydede, M. (2009). A Short Primer on Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins, and Aydede, M., The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.001
Robinson, Michael H., Robinson, Barbara (1971). The Predatory Behavior of the Ogre-Faced Spider F. Cambridge Dinopis Longipes (Araneae: Dinopidae). The American Midland Naturalist, 85(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2423914
Sanz, Crickette M., Call, Josep, Morgan, David (2009). Design Complexity in Termite-Fishing Tools of Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Biology Letters, 5(3), 293-96. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0786
Smith, J. David (2005). Studies of Uncertainty Monitoring and Meta-Cognition in Animals and Humans. In H. Terrace and J. Metcalfe (Eds), The Missing Link in Cognition: Origins of Self-Reflective Consciousness (pp. 38-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0010
Smith, J. David (2009). The Study of Animal Metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 389-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.009
Smith, J. David, Shields, W. E, Schull, a Washburn, J. D. (1997). The Uncertain Response in Humans and Animals. Cognition, 62(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00726-3
Sokol, Joshua (2017). The Thoughts of a Spiderweb. Obtenido de: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-thoughts-of-a-spiderweb-20170523/#
Sterelny, Kim (2004). Externalism, Epistemic Artefacts and The Extended Mind. In Richard Schantz (Ed.), The Externalist Challenge. New Studies on Cognition and Intentionality (pp. 239-254). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Vermaas, Pieter E., Houkes, Wybo (2006). Technical Functions: A Drawbridge between the Intentional and Structural Natures of Technical Artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.002
Wrigth, Larry (1973). Functions. The Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183766