Joint Programmes and Degrees in the European Higher Education Area
Abstract
Joint transnational programs and qualifications are an essential element both for the internationalisation of universities and for the development of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), by facilitating the mobility of students and teachers and the international cooperation of the participating institutions. However, its development and practical implementation are hampered by the different national regulations on the quality assurance of the programs and recognition of the granted degrees. Joint programs constitute a paradox of the Bologna process, since transnational programs and qualifications are developed, ensure quality and are recognised in a different national context. This paper discusses and analyzes the background and current situation of the projects and activities and the ministerial recommendations on joint programs in the EHEA, such as the Erasmus Mundus projects and the European Approach to Quality Assurance of Joint Programs, approved by the Ministerial Conference of 2015 of the EHEA with the recommendation of an unique accreditation of the programs and multiple recognition of the degrees. As a result, some suggestions are proposed on practical aspects of the joint programs and degrees that can help to facilitate their development at the level of practical implementation, evaluation process, recognition of evaluation decisions, recognition of degrees awarded and terminology.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Alkis, N. y Taskaya Temizel, T. (2018). The Impact of Motivation and Personality on Academic Performance in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 35-47. Recuperado de https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/21_3/4.pdf
Bhagat, K. K., Subheesh, N. P., Bhattacharya, B. y Chang, C. Y. (2017). The Design and Development of Identification of Students' Misconceptions in Individualized Learning Environment (iSMILE) System. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 19-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00602a
Elmahdi, I., Hattami, A. y Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 182-188. Recuperado de http://www.tojet.net/articles/v17i2/17218.pdf
Flavin, M. y Quintero, V. (2018). UK higher education institutions’ technology-enhanced learning strategies from the perspective of disruptive innovation. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1-12. Recuperado de https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/1987/pdf_1
Garrote Rojas, D., Arenas Castillejo, J. A. y Jiménez Fernández, S. (2018). Las TIC como herramientas para el desarrollo de la competencia intercultural. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 7(2), 166-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.10543
Gorski, F., Bun, P., Wichniarek, R., Zawadzki, P. y Hamrol, A. (2017). Effective Design of Educational Virtual Reality Applications for Medicine using Knowledge-Engineering Techniques. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 395-416. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00623a
Hsu, T. C. y Hwang, G. J. (2017). Effects of a Structured Resource-based Web Issue-Quest Approach on Students’ Learning Performances in Computer Programming Courses. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 82-94. Recuperado de https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/20_3/7.pdf
Kurucay, M. y Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
Lee, J. y Choi, H. (2017). What affects learner's higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers & Education, 115, 143-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015
Lin, C. Y. y Wang, T. H. (2017). Implementation of Personalized E-Assessment for Remedial Teaching in an E-Learning Environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(4), 1045-1058. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00657a
Mtebe, J. S. y Raphael, C. (2018). Key factors in learners’ satisfaction with the e-learning system at the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 107-122. Recuperado de https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/2993/1502
Raes, A. y Schellens, T. (2016). The effects of teacher-led class interventions during technology-enhanced science inquiry on students’ knowledge integration and basic need satisfaction. Computers & Education, 92,125-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.014
Reyes, V. C., Reading, C., Doyle, H. y Gregory, S. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, 115, 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.009
Salas Rueda, R. A. (2016). Diseño y análisis de un sistema web educativo considerando los estilos de aprendizaje. España: 3Ciencias.
Salas Rueda, R. A. (2018). Uso del modelo TPACK como herramienta de innovación para el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje en matemáticas. Perspectiva educacional, 57(2), 3-26. Recuperado de http://www.perspectivaeducacional.cl/index.php/peducacional/article/view/689
Salas Rueda, R. A. y Salas Silis, J. A. (2018). Simulador Logic.ly ¿Herramienta tecnológica para facilitar el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje sobre las Matemáticas? Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 5(3), 1-25.
Sarac, H. (2018). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics-Stem Educational Practices on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 125-142. Recuperado de http://www.tojet.net/articles/v17i2/17213.pdf
Shelton, C. (2018). You have to teach to your personality: Caring, sharing and teaching with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 92-106. Recuperado de https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3557/1501
Sumuer, E. (2018). Factors related to college students’ self-directed learning with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 29-43. Recuperado de https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3142/1485
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J. y Chang, H. S. (2015). An Integrated Contextual and Web-based Issue Quest Approach to Improving Students’ Learning Achievements, Attitudes and Critical Thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 299-311. Recuperado de https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/18_4/23.pdf
Tejada Fernández, J. y Pozos Pérez, K. V. (2018). Nuevos escenarios y competencias digitales docentes: hacia la profesionalización docente con tic. Revista Profesorado, 22(1), 25-51. Recuperado de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/63620
Thiel, L. V. (2018). Professional learning design framework: supporting technology integration in Alberta. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1-24. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.1989
Widodo, A. y Wahyudin, C. (2018). Selection of Learning Media Mathematics for Junior School Students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 154-160. Recuperado de http://www.tojet.net/articles/v17i1/17115.pdf
Whitton, N. (2018). Playful learning: tools, techniques, and tactics. Research in Learning Technology, 26,1-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2035
Yan, Z. M., Chai, C. S. y So, H. J. (2018). Creating tools for inquiry-based mathematics learning from technological pedagogical content knowledge perspectives: Collaborative design approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 57-71. Recuperado de https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3755/1495
Zlatovic, M., Balaban, I. y Kermek, D. (2015). Using online assessments to stimulate learning strategies and achievement of learning goals. Computers & Education, 91, 32-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.012