Development and application of new techonologies to higher education
Abstract
E-status is a computer tool designed so that the students can solve statistical problems and obtain immediate correction. In the present work we put forward: a) its use during the adaptation to the system of credits ECTS required by the process of European convergence, exemplified in a concrete subject; and b) a design proposed to quantify its impact in the learning.
The methodology is based on a number of problems (22, in this case) that the students can solve repeatedly, since the initial data is variable. The professor follows a planning coordinated with the agenda of the course, and problems are made public when the educational material is given to the students. All the work is kept in a data base, so that both professors and students can follow up and value the reached progress. Thus, while the goal of the students can be to reach some mark from their work, the professor has a resource to measure the dedication of the pupils, to detect weak points in their advance and to take corrective measures.
We have confirmed that the tool fits well with the EHEA model, since lines as ICTs promotion, more active role of the student in the learning, or the educational development of new materials and techniques are a priority to the Bologna Process.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Bernhard, I. (2006). Ethical Acts in Robotics. Recover from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252251026_Ethical_acts_in_robotics.
Bertolini, A. y Palmerini, E. (s.f.). Regulating Robots: A challenge for Europe. Recuperado de: http://web.jus.unipi.it/summer-lisbon/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/06/Paper-Bertolini-Palmerini.pdf
Bringsjord, S. (2006) Ethical Robots: The Future Can Heed Us.
Recover from: http://kryten.mm.rpi.edu/sb_aiandsociety_051706_0800.doc
Cangelosi, A. y Schlesinger. (2015). Development Robotics. From babies to robots. Cambridge: MIT press.
De Asís, R. (2015). A robotics look from human rights. Madrid: Dykinson, S.L.
Dennett, D. (2000). When HAL kills, Who´s to blame? Cambridge: MIT press.
Engineering and Pyisical Sciences Research Council. (s.f.). Principles of robotics Regulating robots in the real world. Recover from: https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/
Floridi, L. y Sanders, J. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Recover from: http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/1822/901820.pdf?sequence=1
Intellient robots development and distribution promotion act. Gov. body : ministry of trade, industry and energy. South Korea, 6 january 2016.
Nevejans, N. (2016). European Civil Law. Rules in Robotics. Recover from: European Parliament web site: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU(2016)571379_EN.pd
Nisa, J. (2016). Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ¿social legislation or a new legal system? Recover from: http://tecnologia.elderecho.com/tecnologia/internet_y_tecnologia/Robotica-Inteligencia-Artificial-legislacion-social-nuevo-ordenamiento_11_935305005.html
Robot Strategy. Japan`s Robot Strategy. (2015). Recover from: http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2015/pdf/0123_01b.pdf
Singer, P. (1995). Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sullins, J. (2006). When is a Robot a Moral Agent? International Review of Information Ethics, 6, 23-30.