Woman and inmigration: education in the classrooms
Abstract In this article it is collected some assumptions from the past decade around the process of immigration, analyzing statistics of non-university students in the Spanish educational system. The main objective is to understand the gender differences depending on the nationality of students, taking into account the various levels of education. It has done a complete analysis of the statistics of student s in the course 2000-2001 and 2005-06, of which we have obtained a fairly nuanced and complete map of the presence of immigrants girls and young daughters in the Spanish school system.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Ahl, L. M. (2016). Research Findings' Impact on the Representation of Proportional Reasoning in Swedish Mathematics Textbooks. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 180-204.
Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 231–292.
Aminghafari, M., Cheze, N., & Poggi, J.-M. (2006). Multivariate denoising using wavelets
and principal component analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(9), 2381–2398.
Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 3, 149–159.
Bookstein, A. (1979). Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(5), 269–273.
Bourke, S., & Holbrook, A. P. (2011). Examining PhD and research masters theses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education., 38(4), 407-416.
Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E. W., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., Manea, M., Kärki, A., &
Rosmalen, P. v. (2014). A narrative literature review of games, animations and simulations to teach research methods and statistics. Computers & Education, 74, 1–14.
Brand, P. Z. (2015). The Role of Luck in Originality and Creativity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(1), 31–55.
Brooks, J. S., & Normore, A. H. (2015). Qualitative research and educational leadership: Essential dynamics to consider when designing and conducting studies. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 798-806.
Clarke, G., & Lunt, I. (2014). The concept of ‘originality’ in the Ph.D.: how is it interpreted by examiners? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 39(7), 803-820.
Coniam, D. (2012). Exploring reviewer reactions to manuscripts submitted to academic journals. System, 40(4), 544–553.
Cremin, M. (1998). The Imagination, and Originality, in English and Classroom Drama. English in Education, 32(2), 4–13.
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72-79.
Currie, A. (2016). Ethnographic analogy, the comparative method, and archaeological special pleading. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 55, 84–94.
Dernt, M. (2014). Basics of research paper writing and publishing. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 105-123.
Draaijer, S., Hartog, R. J., & Hofstee, J. (2007). Guidelines for the Design of Digital Closed Questions for Assessment and Learning in Higher Education. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 10(1), 1-29.
Eyisi, D. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91-100.
Faucher, M. A., & Garner, S. L. (2015). A method comparison of photovoice and content analysis: research examining challenges and supports of family caregivers. Applied Nursing Research, 28(4), 262–267.
Geist, M. R. (2010). Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2), 147–154.
Gill, F. J., Leslie, G. D., Grech, C., & Latour, J. M. (2013). Using a web-based survey tool to undertake a Delphi study: Application for nurse education research. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 1322–1328.
Glück, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2010). How Creatives Define Creativity: Definitions Reflect Different Types of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 55-67.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research. (Second Edition ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Hack, C. (2015). Analytical rubrics in higher education: A repository of empirical data. British Journal of Educational Technology, 5, 924–927.
Haertel, E. (2013). How Is Testing Supposed to Improve Schooling? Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 11(1-2), 1-18.
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1207-1231.
Heitzmann, R. (2008). Writing for Publication in Social Studies Education. Social Studies, 99(1), 37-40.
Hersh, W. (1994). Relevance and retrieval evaluation: Perspectives from medicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 201–206.
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T., & Dally, K. (2005). Investigating PhD thesis examination reports. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 98–120.
Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2015). Assessing reflective thinking in solving design problems: The development of a questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 848–863.
Horsford, S. D., & D'Amico, D. (2015). The past as more than prologue: a call for historical research. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 863-873.
Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(2), 173–19.
Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2013). Model-based reasoning. Computers & Education, 64, 131–142.
Johnson, B., & Clarke, J. M. (2003). Collecting Sensitive Data: The Impact on Researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 13(3), 421-434.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Kamp, M.-T. v., Admiraal, W., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Becoming Original: Effects of Strategy Instruction. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 44(6), 543-566.
Kendall, J. (1999). Axial Coding and the Grounded Theory Controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 743-757.
Kotkas, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2016). Identifying Characteristics of Science Teaching/Learning Materials Promoting Students' Intrinsic Relevance. Science Education International, 27(2), 194-216.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Kyvik, S., & Thune, T. (2014). Assessing the quality of PhD dissertations. A survey of external committee members. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 768-782.
Lancaster, T., & Culwin, F. (2007). Preserving academic integrity—fighting against nonoriginality agencies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 153–157.
Lundgren, S. M., & Robertsson, B. (2013). Writing a bachelor thesis generates transferable knowledge and skills useable in nursing practice. Nurse education today, 33(11), 1406–1410.
Maley, A., & Bolitho, R. (2015). Creativity. ELT journal, 69(4), 434-436.
Mårtenssona, P., Forsb, U., Wallinc, S.-B., Zanderd, U., & Nilsson, G. H. (2016). Evaluating research: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality. Research Policy, 45(3), 593–603.
Meneses, J., Fàbregues, S., Rodríguez-Gómez, D., & Ion, G. (2012). Internet in teachers' professional practice outside the classroom: Examining supportive and management uses in primary and secondary schools . Computers & Education, 59(3), 915–924.
Moore, B. (2007). Original sin and insider research. Action Research, 5(1), 27-39.
Mu, C. (2015). Writing and publishing science research papers in english: A global perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 76–78.
Muddiman, A., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). What is Relevant? Student Perceptions of Relevance Strategies in College Classrooms. Communication Studies, 60(2), 130-146.
Neuman, D. (2014). Qualitative research in educational communications and technology: a brief introduction to principles and procedures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 69–86.
Nye, E., Melendez-Torres, G. J., & Bonell, C. (2016). Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta-synthesis. Review of Education, 4(1), 57–79.
O'Donnell, V. L. (2016). Organisational change and development towards inclusive higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 101-119.
Ortinau, D. J. (2011). Writing and publishing important scientific articles: A reviewer's perspective. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 150–156.
Owen, S. V., & Baum, S. M. (1985). The Validity of the Measurement of Originality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 939-944.
Pavoine, S., Ollier, S., & Dufour, A.-B. (2005). Is the originality of a species measurable? Ecology Letters, 8(6), 579–586.
Peng, H. (2015). Assessing the quality of research supervision in mainland Chinese higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 89-100.
Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory. Management Science, 48(6), 765-781.
Powers, Y. A. (2010). Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers to Open-Ended Questions. Educational and Psychological Measurement., 70(1).
Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single-subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11–33.
Rhoten, D., O'Connor, E., & Hackett, E. J. (2009). The Act of Collaborative Creation and the Art of Integrative Creativity: Originality, Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity. Thesis Eleven, 96(1), 83-108.
Robinson, A. L., Emden, C. G., Croft, T. D., & Vosper, G. C. (2011). Mixed Methods Data Collection in Dementia Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 330-344.
Roulston, K. (2014). Interactional problems in research interviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 277–293.
Runco, M. A. (2015). Meta-Creativity: Being Creative About Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(3), 295-298.
Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Creativity, Originality, and Appropriateness: What do Explicit Instructions Tell Us About Their Relationships? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 137–148.
Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994‐2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3-23.
Sik, K. (2015). Tradition or Modernism in Grammar Teaching: Deductive vs. Inductive Approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2141-2144.
Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 79–85.
Smith, R. E., & Yang, X. (2004). Toward a General Theory of Creativity in Advertising: Examining the Role of Divergence. Marketing Theory, 4(1-2), 31–58.
Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., & Mcbride, M. (2009). Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 325-337.
Soler, V. (2011). Comparative and Contrastive Observations on Scientific Titles Written in English and Spanish. English for Specific Purposes, 30(2), 124-137.
Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., & Rainear, A. M. (2016). Social media and crisis research: Data collection and directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 667–672.
Stiburek, D. (2016). Sequential testing of hypotheses about drift for Gaussian diffusions. Statistical Methodology, 33, 14–30.
Stigler, G. J. (1995). The Nature and Role of Originality in Scientific Progress. Economica, 22(88), 293-302.
Ting, C.-Y., & Ho, C. C. (2015). Dataset of scientific inquiry learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1038–1050.
Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (1993). Training in thesis writing: an evaluation of three conceptual orientations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 170–184.
Tosh, S. (2015). Checklist for procedures. Journal scan, 23(3), 13.
Turcotte, C., Drolet, P., & Girard, M. (2004). Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 51(6), 549–556.
Uidhir, C. M., & Freeland, C. (2015). The Role of Luck in Originality and Creativity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(1), 31–55.
Watts, J. H. (2008). Challenges of supervising part-time PhD students: towards student-centred practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 369-373.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 2, 13-23.
Webster, R. (2015). The classroom experiences of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream primary schools—1976 to 2012. What do data from systematic observation studies reveal about pupils’ educational experiences over time? British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 992–1009.
Wood, A. M., & Tarrier, N. (2010). Positive Clinical Psychology: A new vision and strategy for integrated research and practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 819–829.
Zhong, J., & Jiang, S. (2016). Institutional Repositories in Chinese Open Access Development: Status, Progress, and Challenges. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 739–744.
Zuber‐Skerritt, O., & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis in the social sciences. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(4), 413-436.