Comparación del nivel de aprendizaje colaborativo en un curso a distancia
Resumen
En esta investigación se comparó el nivel de aprendizaje colaborativo en cuatro versiones de un curso a distancia, identificadas como V1, V2, V3 y V4, cada una diseñadas con variadas estrategias de aprendizaje. La investigación tuvo los siguientes objetivos: 1) Comparar el nivel de aprendizaje colaborativo obtenido de un curso a distancia a través del tiempo. 2) Comparar el nivel de aprendizaje colaborativo obtenido en las distintas versiones de un curso a distancia. 3) Identificar los elementos que influyeron en el aprendizaje colaborativo a través del tiempo. 4) Identificar si las modificaciones en las estrategias realizadas en el curso a distancia tuvo algún impacto en nivel de aprendizaje colaborativo. El diseño del estudio fue del tipo no experimental evolutivo, de tendencia y comparación de grupos, se administró al final de cada versión del curso el instrumento Encuesta sobre el entorno de aprendizaje constructivista en línea, COLLES por sus siglas en inglés, cuyas dimensiones miden el aprendizaje colaborativo en un entorno virtual de aprendizaje. En los resultados se encontró que las dimensiones Interactividad y Relevancia tuvieron una tendencia al alza durante el tiempo que duró la investigación, por su parte al comparar las versiones del curso, V3 tuvo las mayores puntuaciones en las seis dimensiones del aprendizaje colaborativo, además que esta versión tuvo un impacto significativo en las dimensiones de Interactividad, Relevancia y Apoyo de los Compañeros. En general, todas las versiones del curso tuvieron resultados satisfactorios en el nivel de aprendizaje colaborativo, sin embargo, se concluye que, por su estructura y estrategias empleadas, V3 es la que más favoreció al aprendizaje colaborativo.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Ahmed, M., Hussain, S., & Farid, S. (2018). Factors Influencing the Adoption of e-Learning in an Open and Distance Learning Institution of Pakistan. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(2), 148-158.
Al-Hamad, N., Alhamad, A. & Al-Omari, F. (2020). Smart devices employment in teaching and learning: reality and challenges in Jordan universities. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-0115-0
Azhari, F., Jasmi, N., Abd, M., Jofrry, S., Lee, K., & Ming, L. (2020). Students’ Perceptions about Social Constructivist Learning Environment in e-learning. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 54(2), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.54.2.31
Bai, S., Foon, K., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
Baker, J. (2005). Constructivist Online Learning Environment Survey. In R. Reynolds (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements (pp. 299-301). Idea Group Inc. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781591407928.ch036
Carter, C., & Hagood, D. (2019). Activity Monitor Gaming and the Next Generation Science Standards: Students Engaging with Data, Measurement Limitations, and Personal Relevance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 589-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09789-5
Choudhury, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2020). Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from Stakeholers'. Compuers & Education, 144(103657). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657
Clark, T. (2020). Distance education. In E. Iadanza (Ed.) Clinical Engineering Handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 410-415). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813467-2.00063-8
Dougiamas, M. & Taylor, P. (2002). Interpretive analysis of an internet-based course constructed using a new courseware tool called Moodle. https://bit.ly/37oEOk9
Edmundson, A. (2006). Globalized e-learning cultural challenges. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-301-2
Fajre, C., & Aranciba, V. (2000). La consigna: un manual de instrucciones para leer la escuela. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 121-138.
Fanfarelli, J. (2020). Impact of narrative and badging on learning and engagement in a psychology learning game. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 387-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12838
Fraternali, P., & Herrera, S. (2019). Model Driven Development of Gamified Applications. Journal of Web Engineering, 18(7), 655-694. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.1874
Gagné, R., Wager, W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. (2005). Principles of Instructional Design (5th Ed.). Thomson Wadsworth Leaning. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440211
García-Peñalvo, F. J.(2020). Modelo de referencia para la enseñanza no presencial en universidades presenciales. Campus Virtuales, 9(1), 41-56.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Avoiding the Dark Side of Digital Transformation in Teaching. An Institutional Reference Framework for eLearning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042023
Gros, B. (2005). El aprendizaje colaborativo a través de la red: límites y posibilidades. Aula de innovación educativa, (162), 44-50.
Guiter, M. & Pérez-Mateo, M. (2013). Networked collaboration: towards a definition of online collaborative learning. Theory of Education: Education and Culture in the Information Society, 14(1), 10-30. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.9440
Hilliger, I., Ortiz-Rojas, M., Pesántez-Cabrera, P., Scheihing, E., Tsai, Y.-S., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Broos, T., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2020). Identifying needs for learning analytics adoption in Latin American universities: A mixed-methods approach. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, Article 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100726
Hurlbut, A. (2018). Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1509265
Kapp, K. (2012). The Gamificaction of learning and instruction. Pfeiffer.
Lee, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53, 1320-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
Loes, C. (2019). Applied Learning through Collaborative Educational Experiences. New Directions for Higher Education, 2019(188), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20341
Mercado, R. (2015). El Aprendizaje Colaborativo a Distancia en México. in J. Zubieta & C. Rama, La Educación a Distancia en México (pp. 97-114). UNAM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1440.9360
Miguel, J., Caballé, S., & Xhafa, F. (2017). Trustworthiness for secure collaborative learning. In J. Miguel, S. Caballé y F. Xhafa (Eds.), Intelligent Data Analysis for e-Learning (pp. 25-48). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804535-0.00003-4
Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H., & Kirschner, P. (2019). Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007
Olasina, G. (2019). Human and social factors affecting the decision of students to accept e-learning. Interactive Learning Enviroment, 27(3), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474233
Pearson, J. (2005). Evaluatin e-learning enviroments in initial teacher education programmes using the online learning enviroment survey (OLES). 8th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, WCCE 2005 (pp. 1-9). Emerald Group Publishing LTtd.
Pearson, J., & Trinidad, S. (2005). OLES: an instrument for refining the design of e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21(6), 396-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00146.x
Pološki, N., & Aleksic, A. (2020). Are Active Teaching Methods Suitable for All Generation Y students?—Creativity as a Needed Ingredient and the Role of Learning Style. Education Sciences, 10(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040087
Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2019). Gamification in e-learning: A Moodle implementation and its effect on student engagement and performance. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2019-0030
Rengel, R., Pascual, E., Íñiguez, I., Martín, M., & Vasallo, B. (2019). Experiences on the Design, Creation, and Analysis of Multimedia Content to Promote Active Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09777-9
Reyes, W., & Góngora, G. (2016). Retos en lugar de tareas: una propuesta de trabajo en línea con estudiantes de nivel superior. TEXTOS. Revista Internacional de Aprendizaje y Cibersociedad, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revciber.v19.879
Reyes, W., & Quiñonez, S. (2020). Gamification in distance education: experiences in a university educational model. Revista Apertura, 12(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n2.1849
Rivero, M. (2018). Student’s perception about quality of a blended Learning environment with moodle assistance. Pixel-Bit. Revista de medios y educación, (53), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.13
Sahni, S. (2018). Integrating Assessments in Innovative Learning Process. In H. Fardoun, K. Downing, & M. Mok (Eds.), The Future of Higher Education in the Middle East and Africa (pp. 105-124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64656-5_10
Schjoedt, L., & Sangboon, K. (2015). Control Variables: Problematic Issues and Best Practices. In K. Strang (Ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Research Design in Business and Management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484956_15
Semradova, I., & Hubackova, S. (2016). Teacher responsibility in distance education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 544-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.042
Sheldon, L. (2012). The multiplayer classroom. Cengage Learning.
Sthapornnanon, N., Sakulbumrungsil, R., Theeraroungchaisri, A., & Watcharadamrongkun, S. (2009). Social Constructivist Learning Environment in an Online Professional. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj730110
Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Syed-Mohamad, S., Pardi, K., Zainal, N., & Ismail, Z. (2006). Expanding nursing education through e-learning: A case study in Malaysia. In H. Park, P. Murray, & C. Delaney (Eds.), Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 122, pp. 186-189). IMIA.
Taylor, P., & Maor, D. (2000). Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey. In A. Herrmann and M.M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000. Curtin University of Technology.
Torres-Toukoumidis, A., Ramírez-Montoya, M., & Romero-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Assessment and evaluation of games-based learning (gbl) in e-learning contexts. Education in the Knowledge Society, 19(4), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2018194109128
Trinidad, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2005). Development, validation and use of the Online Learning Environment Survey. AJET. Australasian Journal of Educational Tecnology, 21(1), 60-81. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1343
UADY. (2012). Modelo Educativo para la Formación Integral. https://bit.ly/3Erovik
UADY. (2013). Plan de Desarrollo UADY Virtual 2013 - 2020. https://bit.ly/3xCVSNM
Vershitskaya, E., Mikhaylova, A., Gilmanshina, S., Dorozhkin, E., & Epaneshnikov, V. (2020). Present-day management of universities in Russia: Prospects and challenges of e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09978-0
Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2015). Gamification Toolkit: Dynamics, Mechanics, and Components for the Win. Wharton Digital Press.
Zainuddin, Z., Wah, S., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326