A skholé for teachers: the study as a constitutive dimension of the teacher's work

Abstract

The present proposition claims the study as a constitutive and basic element of the teacher's work. In this text, we will think about it through activities developed within the scope of initial teacher training, our area of activity (one, teacher of a licentiate course at a public university and the other, teacher of elementary and high level at a public school). Such action allows us to indicate, at first, certain incongruities in the discourse about the professionalization / bureaucratization of the teacher. In this sense, we emphasize that the initial teachers training is increasingly based on a logic of learning and skills development, most of which are aimed at ensuring the insertion in the job market and professional performance adapted to productivist logics. In view of this, we propose to think within the notion of skholé - a free time and a public space - the possibilities of studying the craft not only in its specific contents and methodologies, but especially through its gestures and ways of doing. Therefore, the focus is not on a teaching method, but on the activation of an experimentation developed through observations, thoughts and practices that put the school - and consequently the classroom - as a subject of study. On that account, the practicum, this fundamental stage of initial teachers training, is a time and space of attention at the school. Its subject is the work of the teacher and its matter the elements that constitute this work. To that end, we particularly rely on the writings of Jan Masschelein and Marteen Simons on the notion of scholar and Jorge Larrosa on the work of teacher.

  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Alonso Arévalo, J. (2016). ¿Cómo crear un perfil en ORCID? Retrieved from https://goo.gl/2oxX8s
Aparici, R., & Osuna Acedo, S. (2013). La cultura de la participación. Revista Mediterránea en Comunicación, 4(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2013.4.2.07
Carpenter, T. (2015). Why assessment needs persistent identifiers like Orcid. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/oX7Jxo
Delgado López-Cózar, E., & Martín-Martín, A. (2016). Difusión y visibilidad de la producción científica en la red: Construyendo la identidad digital científica de un autor. Paper presented at the Programa de Doctorado en Estudios Migratorios, 11-12 abril de 2016, Granada, España. https://goo.gl/XAV5fg
Fernández-Marcial, V., & González-Solar, L. (2015). Promoción de la investigación e identidad digital: El caso de la Universidade da Coruña. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 656-664. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.14
Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2011). La Universidad de la próxima década: La Universidad Digital. In C. Suárez-Guerrero & F. J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.), Universidad y Desarrollo Social de la Web (pp. 181-197). Washington DC, USA: Editandum.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016a). La tercera misión. Education in the Knowledge Society, 17(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2016171718
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016b). ¿Son conscientes las universidades de los cambios que se están produciendo en la Educación Superior? Education in the Knowledge Society, 17(4), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2016174713
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017a). ¿Cómo construir un perfil digital de investigador en Innovación Educativa? Paper presented at the IV Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad. CINAIC 2017 (4-6 de Octubre de 2017), Zaragoza, España. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1001027
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017b, 18/05). El (des)gobierno de las tecnologías de la información en las universidades. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/xmQVZD
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018a). Cómo construir un perfil digital de investigador. Paper presented at the Programa de Formación del Profesorado 2018 de la Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1283783
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018b). Proyecto Docente e Investigador. Catedrático de Universidad. Perfil Docente: Ingeniería del Software y Gobierno de Tecnologías de la Información. Perfil Investigador: Tecnologías del Aprendizaje. Área de Ciencia de la Computación e Inteligencia Artificial. Salamanca, España: Departamento de Informática y Automática. Universidad de Salamanca. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1237989
García-Peñalvo, F. J., García de Figuerola, C., & Merlo-Vega, J. A. (2010). Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520-539. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072963
Gunn, W. (2013). Social signals reflect academic impact: What it means when a scholar adds a paper to Mendeley. Information standards quarterly, 25(2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.06
Harzing, A. W. (2013). The Publish or Perish Book. Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis Retrieved from https://goo.gl/GiDy2z
Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2018). Rainbow of open science practices: Zenodo.
Lara, T. (2007). El currículo posmoderno en la cultura digital Cultura Digital y Comunicación Participativa. Sevilla: Zemos98.
Lara, T. (2009). El papel de la Universidad en la construcción de su identidad digital. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 6(1), 15-21.
McFedries, P. (2012). Measuring the impact of altmetrics [Technically Speaking]. IEEE Spectrum, 49(8), 28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2012.6247557
OCSDNet. (2017a). Manifesto Infographic (Spanish) Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet). Retrieved from https://goo.gl/owTrFH
OCSDNet (Producer). (2017b). Open Science Manifesto. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/Y1X0xtB_JcY
Open Science and Research Initiative. (2014). Open Science and Research Handbook Retrieved from https://goo.gl/dFcdo4
Orduña-Malea, E., & Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2018). Dimensions: re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information. El Profesional de la Información, 27(2), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.21
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010, 26 October). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/U7xWT2
Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & McGreal, R. (2018). Shared Science and Knowledge. Open Access, Technology and Education. Comunicar, 26(54), 1-5.
Schonfeld, R. C. (2018, January 15, 2018). A new citation database launches today: Digital Science’s Dimensions. Retrieved from http://static.ow.ly/docs/declaracion%20salamanca_7ElZ.pdf
Van-Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126-129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a
Vidal, J. (2014). La misión de la Universidad. In C. Cardona & E. Chiner (Eds.), Investigación educativa en escenarios diversos, plurales y globales (pp. 41-54). Madrid, España: EOS.
A skholé for teachers: the study as a constitutive dimension of the teacher’s work. (2019). Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 31(2), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.20862
+ −