State and Democracy v. X.X. The Possibilities of Digital Constitutionalism
Abstract In a forward-looking exercise towards 2058, this academic article presents a perspective on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the reshaping of power, freedom, and democracy, questioning the necessity of the constitutional democratic state in a world dominated by technology. On one hand, the efficiency and problem-solving capabilities of ais suggest that they could offer more effective mechanisms for public administration, surpassing the bureaucratic limitations of traditional human structures. This stance posits that, by relying on ai for optimized solutions, we might come to question the relevance of traditional principles, values, and normative and institutional structures, which have been forged through complex historical-political processes. On the other hand, the opposing argument warns about the risks of excessive technological dependency. Despite the advantages that ai can offer, its unregulated or unscrutinized dominance could threaten human freedoms and rights, creating inequalities and adverse effects. The main reflection of the work revolves around «digital constitutionalism,» a proposal that seeks to balance the benefits of ai with democratic values and constitutional principles. This approach defends the idea that it is possible, and necessary, to harmonize technology with the respect and promotion of human rights, thereby preventing technological efficiency from prevailing over democratic guarantees or necessarily leading us to have to choose between one vision or the other.
- Referencias
- Cómo citar
- Del mismo autor
- Métricas
Boobier, T. 2022: AI and the Future of the Public Sector: The Creation of Public Sector 4.0. Wiley Finance. Inglaterra: Wiley. (Edición de Kindle).
Celeste, E. 2023: Digital Constitutionalism: The Role of Internet Bills of Rights. Routledge Research in the Law of Emerging Technologies. Inglaterra: Routledge. (Edición Kindle).
Dewey, J. 2021: Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Estados Unidos: EdTechbooks.org. Disponible en: https://edtechbooks.org/pdfs/mobile/democracyandeducation/_democracyandeducation.pdf
Isunza Vera, E. y Gurza Lavalle, A. (eds.). 2018: Controles Democráticos no electorales y Regímenes de rendición de cuentas en el Sur Global. México, Colombia, Brasil, China y Sudáfrica. Reino Unido: Peter Lang AG.
Smyth, S. 2019: Biometrics, Surveillance and the Law: Societies of Restricted Access, Discipline and Control. Routledge Research in the Law of Emerging Technologies. Inglaterra: Taylor & Francis. (Edición de Kindle).
Uslaner, E. M. 2015: «The Consequences of Corruption». En P. M. Heywood: Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption. Inglaterra: Taylor and Francis.
Celeste, E. 2023: Digital Constitutionalism: The Role of Internet Bills of Rights. Routledge Research in the Law of Emerging Technologies. Inglaterra: Routledge. (Edición Kindle).
Dewey, J. 2021: Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Estados Unidos: EdTechbooks.org. Disponible en: https://edtechbooks.org/pdfs/mobile/democracyandeducation/_democracyandeducation.pdf
Isunza Vera, E. y Gurza Lavalle, A. (eds.). 2018: Controles Democráticos no electorales y Regímenes de rendición de cuentas en el Sur Global. México, Colombia, Brasil, China y Sudáfrica. Reino Unido: Peter Lang AG.
Smyth, S. 2019: Biometrics, Surveillance and the Law: Societies of Restricted Access, Discipline and Control. Routledge Research in the Law of Emerging Technologies. Inglaterra: Taylor & Francis. (Edición de Kindle).
Uslaner, E. M. 2015: «The Consequences of Corruption». En P. M. Heywood: Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption. Inglaterra: Taylor and Francis.
Bonilla Gutiérrez, J. C. (2025). State and Democracy v. X.X. The Possibilities of Digital Constitutionalism. AIS: Ars Iuris Salmanticensis, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14201/AIS20241225971
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
+
−