Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003 <p>The Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública (RLOP) is the official publication of the <a href="http://www.waporlatinoamerica.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">World Association for Public Opinion Research Latinoamérica</a> (WAPOR Latam). Since 2020 it is edited by the <a href="http://americo.usal.es/iberoame/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Instituto de Iberoamérica</a> and <a href="https://www.eusal.es/index.php/eusal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca</a>.</p> <p>One issue is published a year in Open Access continuous publication. The journal admits and publishes articles and research notes in Spanish, English and Portuguese.</p> <p>RLOP has initiated a new stage in which it will focus on the publication and dissemination of:</p> <ul> <li class="li1 show"><span class="s2">-public opinion studies that contribute to the theoretical development and empirical verification of current social and political aspects and issues;</span></li> <li class="li1 show"><span class="s2">-studies that address these issues from a national, sub-national, transnational or more global research perspective;</span></li> <li class="li1 show"><span class="s2">-studies that address the role of public opinion in political decisions, the development of public policies, electoral behavior and communication;</span></li> <li class="li1 show"><span class="s2">-evaluations and improvements in the methodology of public opinion polls, and big data and in the analysis of these types of data</span></li> </ul> <p>The journal is aimed at public opinion scholars in Latin America, whether from the academic or professional world.</p> en-US <p>Authors who publish in RLOP will accept the following conditions:</p> <p>The authors retain the copyright and assign to the Journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).</p> rlop@usal.es (Ryan E. Carlin & Mariano Torcal) redero@usal.es (Ángel Redero (Universidad de Salamanca)) Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:58:09 +0100 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Can Latin American Voters see the Future? https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31348 <p>The present study examined whether Argentinian citizens could predict election results at the sub-national level. We targeted Argentinian Twitter users in seven provinces with polls using Twitter Ads. Argentinian Twitter users constitute a high-ability subgroup that possesses several characteristics that enhance citizen forecasting competence. The polls asked citizens to predict what party would win the first round of the upcoming presidential election in their province. We present a preliminary citizen forecast of the first round of the 2023 Argentinian presidential election. The forecast demonstrates three preliminary findings. First, citizens expect a competitive election in their respective provinces. Second, citizens in almost all the provinces expect an opposition victory. Finally, a high degree of uncertainty surrounds these predictions, with no party obtaining a greater than 50 percent probability of winning in any of the provinces.</p> Brian Thompson-Collart, Evelyne Brie, Yannick Dufresne Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31348 Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0100 Procedural fairness and political attitudes: unpacking the experiences of victims of intimate partner violence with the police https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31356 <p class="p1">What is the relationship between procedural fairness in encounters with the police and intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors’ attitudes? I argue that because of the emotional damage caused by victimization, survivors are especially attuned to the interpersonal treatment they receive when seeking help from specialized services (e. g., police). If this treatment is procedurally unfair, they might conclude that IPV laws are not effective and become less likely to report intentions to intervene by calling the police if they witness intimate partner violence. Relying on public opinion data from Brazil, I find that procedural fairness matters for survivors’ opinions about laws, but I found no relationship between procedural fairness and bystander intervention attitudes. I explore possible explanations for this non-finding with several additional analyses.</p> Helen Rabello Kras Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31356 Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0200 Legitimizing violence by protestors and the police in social protests: The case of Chile, 2019-2022 https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31706 <p>Based on a theoretical discussion on the legitimation of violence, we postulate 4 hypotheses on the determinants of the legitimation of acts of violence perpetrated by protests and state agents in popular manifestations in Chile. We test them using polling data from national surveys conducted by the Center for Public Studies between 2019 and 2022. Marches enjoy more legitimation than other forms of violence by protestors. We find a reduction in the legitimation of violence by protests and an increase in the legitimation of violence by state agents in 2021 and 2022 compared to 2019. Those who trust less the Carabineros police and those who believe that the armed forces violated human rights legitimize more all forms of violence by protestors and less the violence by state agents. Right-wingers legitimize violence by state agents more, and leftwingers legitimize violence by protestors more and less that by state agents.</p> Maximiliano Agustín Ross Zbinden, Patricio Daniel Navia Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31706 Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0200 María Esperanza Casullo y Harry Brown Araúz. El Populismo en América Central. La pieza que falta para comprender un fenómeno global. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores, 2023. 288 páginas. ISBN 978-987-801-276-6. https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31808 Salvador Martí i Puig Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31808 Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0200 Aldo Adrián Martínez Hernández. Partidos y sistemas de partidos en América Latina: Éxito electoral y cambio político (1988-2016). Toluca: Instituto Electoral del Estado de México, 2022. 437 páginas. ISBN 978-607-8818-16-7. https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31965 Fernando Casal Bértoa Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1852-9003/article/view/31965 Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0200