The Conflicting Cue Effect: Confusing Messages and the Limits of Elite Influence in Brazil’s Covid-19 Vaccination Campaign

Abstract

How do citizens respond when political leaders and their governments send conflicting messages during a public health crisis? We conducted a survey-based information experiment with 857 unvaccinated Brazilians in March 2021, shortly after the start of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign. Participants were randomly exposed to cues about two vaccines—Coronavac and Astrazeneca—emphasizing their country of origin, regulatory approval, and federal government procurement. Results show that political preference shaped interpretation: among supporters of the then President Jair Bolsonaro, willingness to vaccinate decreased when the Chinese vaccine (which Bolsonaro had criticized) was mentioned. However, when information also included government approval and procurement, this negative effect disappeared, and responses became statistically indistinguishable from the control group—a pattern we refer to as the conflicting cue effect. Among opponents, information linked to the Bolsonaro administration triggered a backfire effect, lowering willingness to vaccinate with Astrazeneca. These findings highlight how, in contrast to models that assume consistent elite influence, real-world political communication often involves contradictory signals that produce asymmetric and sometimes unintended responses. By examining how citizens interpret these conflicting cues, the study contributes new evidence on the limits of elite influence in polarized contexts.

  • Referencias
  • Cómo citar
  • Del mismo autor
  • Métricas
Ajzenman, N., Cavalcanti, T., and Da Mata, D. (2023). More than words: Leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 15(3):351-371.
Barberia, L., Plümper, T., & Whitten, G. D. (2021). The political science of Covid-19: An introduction. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2045-2054.
Barceló, J., Sheen, G. C.-H., Tung, H. H., and Wu, W.-C. (2023). Experts or politicians? citi- zen responses to vaccine endorsements across five OECD countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(1):142-155.
BBC (2020). Covid: Bolsonaro hails suspension of Chinese vaccine trial. BBC News.
Beaumont, P. and Philips, T. (2020). Jair Bolsonaro claims “victory” after suspension of Chinese vaccine trial. The Guardian.
Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (Eds.). (2000). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Bokemper, S. E., Huber, G. A., Gerber, A. S., James, E. K., and Omer, S. B. (2021). Timing of Covid-19 vaccine approval and endorsement by public figures. Vaccine, 39(5):825-829.
Bullock, J. G. (2020). Party cues. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Clark, M. (2014). Understanding parties’ policy shifts in Western Europe: The role of valence, 1976–2003. British Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 261-286.
De la Cerda, N. and Martinez-Gallardo, C. (2022). Mexico: A politically effective populist pandemic response. In Populists and the Pandemic, pages 29-43. Routledge.
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York: NY.
Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041-1066.
Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of marketing management, 15(4), 291-314.
Farzan, A. N. and Berger, M. (2020). Bolsonaro says Brazilians must not be ‘sissies’ about coronavirus, as ‘all of us are going to die one day’. Washington Post.
Fonseca, E. M. d., Nattrass, N., Lazaro, L. L. B., and Bastos, F. I. (2021). Political discourse, denialism and leadership failure in Brazil’s response to covid-19. Global Public Health, 16(8- 9):1251-1266.
Gramacho, W., Vidigal, R., & Stabile, M. (2025). Issue Framing Effects Across Information Environments. Political Behavior, 1-20.
Gramacho, W., Turgeon, M., Kennedy, J., Stabile, M., and Mundim, P. S. (2021a). Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about covid-19: The case of Brazil. Frontiers in Political Science, 3:36.
Gramacho, W. G., & Turgeon, M. (2021b). When politics collides with public health: Covid-19 vaccine country of origin and vaccination acceptance in Brazil. Vaccine, 39(19), 2608-2612.
Gramacho, W., Turgeon, M., & Fernandez, M. (2024a). What if there is still no vaccine? The importance of media behavior in adherence to non-pharmacological interventions (npis) during covid-19 in Brazil. Journal of Science Communication-América Latina, 7(2), A01.
Gramacho, W., Turgeon, M., Mundim, P. S., and Pereira, I. (2024b). Why did Brazil fail to vaccinate children against Covid-19 during the pandemic? an assessment of attitudinal and behavioral determinants. Vaccine, 42(2):315-321.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1999). Competing for endorsements. American Economic Review, 89(3), 501-524.
Jeantet, D. and Biller, D. (2021). Brazil receives vaccine cargo from India amid supply concern. AP News.
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge University Press.
Pearson, S. and Dube, R. (2021). Brazil embraces Chinese Covid-19 vaccine as cases soar. Wall Street Journal.
Philips, T. (2020). ’We’re being left behind’: anger and confusion in Brazil as vaccine program lags. The Guardian.
Pink, S. L., Chu, J., Druckman, J. N., Rand, D. G., & Willer, R. (2021). Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2106559118.
Rutledge, P. E. (2020). Trump, covid-19, and the war on expertise. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6-7):505-511.
Samuels, D. J. and Zucco, C. (2018). Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans: Voting behavior in Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
Sylvester, S., Motta, M., Trujillo, K. L., and Callaghan, T. (2023). Vaccinating across the aisle: using co-partisan source cues to encourage covid-19 vaccine uptake in the ideological right. Journal of behavioral medicine, 46(1):311-323.
Wallace, L. E. and Wegener, D. T. (2023). A test of vaccine endorsement by political in-versus out- group sources: Effect on vaccination likelihood and exploration of mediation through perceived bias and liking. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(9):e12818.
de Oliveira Gouveia Freire, A., Gramacho, W., & Turgeon, M. (2025). The Conflicting Cue Effect: Confusing Messages and the Limits of Elite Influence in Brazil’s Covid-19 Vaccination Campaign. Revista Latinoamericana De Opinión Pública, 14, e32263. https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.32263

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
+ −