Results

Descriptives

Descriptives
	hospitalizados	no_hospitalizados	procedencia_mixta	n_sin disfagia	n_disfagia	n_disfagia_hospitalizados	n_disfagia_no hospitalizados	n_disfagia_proc mixta
N	13	8	8	29	29	13	8	8
Missing	16	21	21	0	0	16	21	21
Sum	3076	7233	34051	35587	8773	920	2152	5701

Contingency Tables

Contingency Tables
	disfagia
procedencia_pacientes	DISFAGIA	NO DISFAGIA	Total
HOSPITALIZADOS	920	2156	3076
NO HOSPITALIZADOS	2152	5081	7233
PROCEDENCIA MIXTA	5701	28350	34051
Total	8773	35587	44360

χ² Tests
	Value	df	p
χ²	850	2	< .001
N	44360

Contingency Tables

Contingency Tables
		disfagia
procedencia_pacientes		DISFAGIA	NO DISFAGIA	Total
HOSPITALIZADOS	Observed	920	2156	3076
	% within row	29.9 %	70.1 %	100.0 %
	% within column	10.5 %	6.1 %	6.9 %
	% of total	2.1 %	4.9 %	6.9 %
NO HOSPITALIZADOS	Observed	2152	5081	7233
	% within row	29.8 %	70.2 %	100.0 %
	% within column	24.5 %	14.3 %	16.3 %
	% of total	4.9 %	11.5 %	16.3 %
PROCEDENCIA MIXTA	Observed	5701	28350	34051
	% within row	16.7 %	83.3 %	100.0 %
	% within column	65.0 %	79.7 %	76.8 %
	% of total	12.9 %	63.9 %	76.8 %
Total	Observed	8773	35587	44360
	% within row	19.8 %	80.2 %	100.0 %
	% within column	100.0 %	100.0 %	100.0 %
	% of total	19.8 %	80.2 %	100.0 %

χ² Tests
	Value	df	p
χ²	850	2	< .001
N	44360

Plots

Prevalencia de disfagia en los artículos

Random-Effects Model (k = 29)
	Estimate	se	Z	p	CI Lower Bound	CI Upper Bound
Intercept	0.390	0.0441	8.84	< .001	0.303	0.476
	.	.	.	.	.	.
Note. Tau² Estimator: Restricted Maximum-Likelihood

[3]

Heterogeneity Statistics
Tau	Tau²	I²	H²	R²	df	Q	p
0.234	0.0548 (SE= 0.015 )	99.68%	310.917	.	28.000	3826.859	< .001

Forest Plot

[3]

Publication Bias Assessment

Fail-Safe N Analysis (File Drawer Analysis)
Fail-safe N		p
89209.000		< .001
Note. Fail-safe N Calculation Using the Rosenthal Approach

Rank Correlation Test for Funnel Plot Asymmetry
Kendall's Tau		p
0.276		0.036

Regression Test for Funnel Plot Asymmetry
Z		p
2.892		0.004

Funnel Plot

[3]

Contingency Tables

Contingency Tables
	disfagia (2)
método (2)	DISFAGIA	NO DISFAGIA	Total
RETROSPECTIVO	233	1639	1872
PROSPECTIVO	8540	33948	42488
Total	8773	35587	44360

χ² Tests
	Value	df	p
χ²	66.2	1	< .001
N	44360

Contingency Tables

Contingency Tables
		disfagia (2)
método (2)		DISFAGIA	NO DISFAGIA	Total
RETROSPECTIVO	Observed	233	1639	1872
	% within row	12.4 %	87.6 %	100.0 %
	% within column	2.7 %	4.6 %	4.2 %
	% of total	0.5 %	3.7 %	4.2 %
PROSPECTIVO	Observed	8540	33948	42488
	% within row	20.1 %	79.9 %	100.0 %
	% within column	97.3 %	95.4 %	95.8 %
	% of total	19.3 %	76.5 %	95.8 %
Total	Observed	8773	35587	44360
	% within row	19.8 %	80.2 %	100.0 %
	% within column	100.0 %	100.0 %	100.0 %
	% of total	19.8 %	80.2 %	100.0 %

χ² Tests
	Value	df	p
χ²	66.2	1	< .001
N	44360

Comparative Measures
			95% Confidence Intervals
	Value		Lower	Upper
Odds ratio	0.565		0.492	0.650
Relative risk	0.619	ᵃ	0.548	0.699
ᵃ rows compared

Contingency Tables

Contingency Tables
	disfagia (3)
procedencia (2)	con disfagia	sin disfagia	Total
HOSPITALIZADOS	920	2156	3076
NO HOSPITALIZADOS	2152	5081	7233
Total	3072	7237	10309

χ² Tests
	Value	df	p
χ²	0.0253	1	0.874
N	10309

References

[1] The jamovi project (2021). jamovi. (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

[2] R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org. (R packages retrieved from MRAN snapshot 2021-04-01).

[3] Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software. link, 36, 1-48.